Environmental Health Criteria 214

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Iman RL & Helton JC (1988) An investigation of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models. Risk Anal, 8(1): 71-90. IPCS (1992) Environmental health criteria 141: Quality management for chemical safety testing. Geneva, World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety. IPCS (1993) Environmental health criteria 155: Biomarkers and risk assessment: Concept and principles. Geneva, World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety. IPCS (1994) Environmental health criteria 170: Assessing human health risks of chemicals: The derivation of guidance values for health-based exposure limits. Geneva, World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety. IPCS (1997d) Environmental health criteria 188: Nitrogen dioxide, 2nd edition. Geneva, World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety. ISO (1991) International standard 8258: Shewhart control charts. Geneva, International Organization for Standardization. ISO (1993) International standard 7870: Control charts -- General guide and introduction. Geneva, International Organization for Standardization. ISO (1994) International standard 5725: Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results -- Part 1: General principles and definitions. Geneva, International Organization for Standardization. ISO (1997) International standard 7871: Cusum charts. Geneva, International Organization for Standardization. Ito Y (1993) [The history of the investigating group on the per capita intake/day of food additives in Japan.] Foods Food Ingred J, 157: 4-21 (in Japanese). James IR & Knuiman MW (1987) An application of Bayes methodology to the analysis of diary records from a water use study. J Am Stat Assoc, 82(399): 705-711. Jantunen M, Hänninen O, Katsouyanni K, Knöppel H , Künzli N, Lebret E, Maroni M, Saarela K, Sram R, & Zmirou D (1998) Air pollution exposure in European cities: The EXPOLIS-Study. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, 8(4): 495-518. Jenkins P, Phillips TJ, Mulberg EJ, & Hui SP (1992) Activity patterns of Californians: Use of and proximity to indoor pollutant sources. Atmos Environ, 26A. Jensen H (1992) Lead in household dust. Sci Total Environ, 114: 1-6. Jensen J, Poulsen K, Mygind K, Weeke ER, & Weeke B (1989) Immunochemical estimations of allergenic activities from outdoor aero-allergens, collected by a high-volume sampler. Allergy, 44: 52-59. http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc214.htm Page 246 of 284 6/1/2007
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Jimenez RD & Velasquez A (1989) Metropolitan Maniza: A framework for its sustained development. Environ Urban, 1(1): 51-58. Johansen HR, Alexander J, Rossland OJ, Planting S, Lovik M, Gaarder PI, Gdynia W, Bjerve KS, & Becher G (1996) PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCDs in human blood in relation to consumption of crabs from a contaminated fjord area in Norway. Environ Health Perspect, 104: 756-764. Johnson T (1983) A study of personal exposures to carbon monoxide in Denver, CO -- Final report (US EPA Contract No. 68-02-3755). Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, US Environmental Protection Agency. Johnson T (1984) A study of personal exposure to carbon monoxide in Denver, CO. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA-600/4-84-014). Johnson T (1989) Human activity patterns in Cincinnati, Ohio. Palo Alto, California, Electric Power Research Institute (Report EPRI EN-6204, Project 940-6). Johnson NL & Kotz S (1970a) Continuous univariate distributions: I. Boston, Massachusetts, Houghton Mifflin Co. Johnson NL & Kotz S (1970b) Continuous univariate distributions: II. New York, John Wiley & Sons. Johnson T, Capell J, & Wijnberg L (1986) Selected data analyses relating to studies of personal carbon monoxide exposure in Denver and Washington, DC -- Final report (US EPA Contract No. 68-02-3496. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, US Environmental Protection Agency. Johnson T, Paul RA, Capel JE, & McCurdy T (1990) Estimation of ozone exposure in Houston using a probabilistic version of NEM: Proceedings of the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Air and Waste Management Association. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Air and Waste Management Association (Paper 90-150.1). Jury W, Spencer W, & Farmer W (1983) Behavior assessment model for trace organics in soil: I. Model description. J Environ Qual, 12: 558-564. Juster FT (1985a) Conceptual and methodological issues involved in the measurement of time use. In: Juster FT & Stafford FP ed. Time, goods, and well being, pp 19-32. Juster FT (1985b) The validity and quality of time use estimates obtained from recall diaries. In: Juster FT & Stafford FP ed. Time, goods, and well being, pp 63-91. Kalton G (1983) Introduction to survey sampling. New York, John Wiley & Sons. Kalton G & Kasprzyk D (1986) The treatment of missing survey data. Surv Methodol, 12: 1-16. Kamphuis HJ, Notermans SHW, Veeneman GH, Van Boom JH, & Rombouts FM (1991) Extracellular polysaccharides of moulds and their immunological activity. In: Fungal cell wall and immune response. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Springer-Verlag, vol H35, pp 157-167. http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc214.htm Page 247 of 284 6/1/2007
Page 1 and 2:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT UNITED NA
Page 3 and 4:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PREAMBLE
Page 5 and 6:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6.6.2. Un
Page 7 and 8:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 10.6.7. B
Page 9 and 10:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (iv) to p
Page 11 and 12:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Organizat
Page 13 and 14:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WHO TASK
Page 15 and 16:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Dr M. You
Page 17 and 18:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Environme
Page 19 and 20:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT increase
Page 21 and 22:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT character
Page 23 and 24:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT include e
Page 25 and 26:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT http://ww
Page 27 and 28:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the carri
Page 29 and 30:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the ideal
Page 31 and 32:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT continuum
Page 33 and 34:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT as well a
Page 35 and 36:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT In regula
Page 37 and 38:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Results o
Page 39 and 40:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Risk miti
Page 41 and 42:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT trends of
Page 43 and 44:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Knowledge
Page 45 and 46:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT small tow
Page 47 and 48:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT * selecti
Page 49 and 50:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT provide s
Page 51 and 52:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the water
Page 53 and 54:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Public po
Page 55 and 56:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT character
Page 57 and 58:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PbB PbF P
Page 59 and 60:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT values in
Page 61 and 62:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT lead meas
Page 63 and 64:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Continuou
Page 65 and 66:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT logarithm
Page 67 and 68:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT events in
Page 69 and 70:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT -1.751 0.
Page 71 and 72:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT one is a
Page 73 and 74:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT house dus
Page 75 and 76:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PM 2.5 co
Page 77 and 78:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 4.5 Non-p
Page 79 and 80:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT season, r
Page 81 and 82:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Table 15.
Page 83 and 84:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Activity
Page 85 and 86:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Similarly
Page 87 and 88:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT local con
Page 89 and 90:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Environme
Page 91 and 92:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT for tempo
Page 93 and 94:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT devices,
Page 95 and 96:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Using a d
Page 97 and 98:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (gases an
Page 99 and 100:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Dermal ab
Page 101 and 102:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Models de
Page 103 and 104:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT partition
Page 105 and 106:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6.6.1 Var
Page 107 and 108:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Probabili
Page 109 and 110:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The ADD i
Page 111 and 112:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 7.1 Intro
Page 113 and 114:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT suitabili
Page 115 and 116:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Carbon mo
Page 117 and 118:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Samplin I
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT TSI Flowr
Page 123 and 124:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 2 litre/m
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT or increa
Page 129 and 130:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Fluosilic
Page 131 and 132:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT dependent
Page 133 and 134:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT basket su
Page 135 and 136:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT reasonabl
Page 137 and 138:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT There are
Page 139 and 140:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT predesign
Page 141 and 142:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT field wou
Page 143 and 144:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT samples v
Page 145 and 146:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT dust to,
Page 147 and 148:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Choosing
Page 149 and 150:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT others sh
Page 151 and 152:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT sampling
Page 153 and 154:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of house
Page 155 and 156:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Individua
Page 157 and 158:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT subject o
Page 159 and 160:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT same assa
Page 161 and 162:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT high-volu
Page 163 and 164:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Immunoche
Page 165 and 166:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 9.5.1 Air
Page 167 and 168:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT measureme
Page 169 and 170:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT By their
Page 171 and 172:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT possess a
Page 173 and 174:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT factors (
Page 175 and 176:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Improved
Page 177 and 178:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT limited.
Page 179 and 180:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Media Che
Page 181 and 182:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of venipu
Page 183 and 184:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Glands at
Page 185 and 186:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT breast-fe
Page 187 and 188:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT equipment
Page 189 and 190:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT only nume
Page 191 and 192:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT procedure
Page 193 and 194:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT clearly p
Page 195 and 196: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The Shewh
Page 197 and 198: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of statis
Page 199 and 200: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT as closel
Page 201 and 202: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT operation
Page 203 and 204: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT reports o
Page 205 and 206: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Indoor Ai
Page 207 and 208: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (calcium,
Page 209 and 210: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 1984; Akl
Page 211 and 212: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT chemilumi
Page 213 and 214: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT carried o
Page 215 and 216: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT beverages
Page 217 and 218: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Total 11
Page 219 and 220: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of mean c
Page 221 and 222: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 30 µg/dl
Page 223 and 224: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The shell
Page 225 and 226: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 12.5 Expo
Page 227 and 228: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT treatment
Page 229 and 230: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Aeration
Page 231 and 232: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT downwind
Page 233 and 234: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Governmen
Page 235 and 236: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Bercini D
Page 237 and 238: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Callahan
Page 239 and 240: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Centers f
Page 241 and 242: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Report of
Page 243 and 244: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Goldstein
Page 245: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (1996) [E
Page 249 and 250: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Seemayer
Page 251 and 252: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT carbon mo
Page 253 and 254: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT order sta
Page 255 and 256: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Lake, Nor
Page 257 and 258: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT effects o
Page 259 and 260: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Saraf A,
Page 261 and 262: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Silbergel
Page 263 and 264: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT retrospec
Page 265 and 266: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT UN ESCAP
Page 267 and 268: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT National
Page 269 and 270: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Wallace L
Page 271 and 272: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WHO (1995
Page 273 and 274: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT RÉSUMÉ
Page 275 and 276: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT le point
Page 277 and 278: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT chercher
Page 279 and 280: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT tóxica a
Page 281 and 282: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6. Modeli
Page 283 and 284: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT ambiental
show all

Environmental Health Criteria 214

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?