Environmental Health Criteria 214

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Harris CC, Weston A, Willey JC, Trivers GE, & Mann DL (1987) Biochemical and molecular epidemiology of human cancer: Indicators of carcinogen exposure, DNA damage, and genetic predisposition. Environ Health Perspect, 75: 109-119. Hart ML, Wentworth JE, & Bailey SD (1994) The effects of trap height and weather variables on recorded pollen concentration at Leicester. Grana, 33: 100-103. Hartwell TD, Clayton CA, Michie RM, Whitmore RW, Zelon HS, & Whithurst DA (1984) Study of carbon monoxide exposure of residents in Washington, DC and Denver, CO. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA-600/4-84-031). Hatch M & Thomas D (1993) Measurement issues in environmental epidemiology. Environ Health Perspect, 101(suppl 4): 49-57. Hattis DB (1986) The promise of molecular epidemiology for quantitative risk assessment. Risk Anal, 6: 181-193. Hauser R, Elreedy S, Hoppin JA, & Christiani DC (1995) The upper airway response in workers exposed to fuel oil ash: nasal lavage analysis. Occup Environ Med, 52: 353-358. Hawley JK (1985) Assessment of health risk from exposure to contaminated soil. Risk Anal, 5: 289-302. Heddle JA, Cimino MC, Hayashi M, Romagna F, Shelby MD, Tucker JD, Vanparys P, & MacGregor JT (1991) Micronuclei as an index of cytogenetic damage: past, present, and future. Environ Mol Mutagen, 18(4): 277-291. HEI (1991) Asbestos in public and commercial buildings: a literature review and synthesis of current knowledge. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Health Effects Institute. Hemminki K (1992) Use of chemical, biochemical, and genetic markers in cancer epidemiology and risk assessment. Am J Ind Med, 21: 65-76. Henderson RF, Bechtold WE, Bond JA, & Sun JD (1989) The use of biological markers in toxicology. Crit Rev Toxicol, 20: 65-82. Hickman JR, McBain DC, & Armstrong (1982) The contribution of drinking water to exposure to toxic substances in Canada. Environ Monit Assess, 2: 71-83. Hinds WC (1982) Aerosol technology: properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles. New York, John Wiley &Sons. Hinton D (1990) Wearable personal activity logger. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Total Exposure Assessment Methodology: A new horizon, Las Vegas, Nevada, 1989. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Air and Waste Management Association. Hoffman FO & Hammonds JS (1994) Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: the need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability. Risk Anal, 14(5):707-712. Hoffmann K, Schwabe R, Krause C, Schulz C, Seifert B, &Ullrich D http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc214.htm Page 244 of 284 6/1/2007
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (1996) [Environmental survey (GerES) 1990/91- Volume IV: Personal exposure to volatile organic compounds in West Germany.] Berlin, Institute for Water, Soil and Air Hygiene (WaBoLu No. 4/1996) (in German). Hoppin JA, Aro ACA, Williams PL, Hu H, & Ryan PB (1995) Validation of K-XRF bone lead measurement in young adults. Environ Health Perspect, 103: 78-83. Horne RA (1978) The chemistry of our environment. New York, Wiley-Interscience, pp 596-593. Horner WE, Lehrer SB, & Salvaggio JE (1994) Fungi. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am, 14: 551-556. Houeto P, Bindoula G, & Hoffman JR (1995) Ethylenebisdithiocarbamates and ethylenethiourea: possible human health hazards. Environ Health Perspect, 103(6): 568-573. Hoyet C, Bessot JC, Le Mao J, Quoix E, & Pauli G (1991) Comparison between Der p I plus Der f I content determinations and guanine measurements in 239 house dust samples. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 88: 678-680. Hu H, Aro ACA, & Rotnitsky A (1995) Bone lead measured by X-ray fluorescence: epidemiologic methods. Environ Health Perspect, 103(suppl 1): 105-110. Hulka B (1991) Epidemiological studies using biological markers: Issues for epidemiologists. APSO Distinguished achievement award lecture. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 1: 13-19. Hulka BS & Margolin BH (1992) Methodological issues in epidemiologic studies using biologic markers. Am J Epidemiol, 135: 200-209. Hulka BS & Wilcosky T (1988) Biological markers in epidemiologic research. Arch Environ Health, 43: 83-89. Hyvarinen AM, Martikainen PJ, & Nevalainen AI (1991) Suitability of poor medium in counting total viable airborne bacteria. Grana, 30: 414-417. IAEA (1989) Evaluating the reliability of predictions made using environmental transfer models. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency (Safety Series No. 100). IAEA (1995) Survey of reference materials -- Volume 1: Biological and environmental reference materials for trace elements, nuclides and microcontaminants. A report prepared by the International Atomic Energy Agency in co-operation with the United Nations Environment Programme. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency (Document IAEA-TECDOC-854). IAEA (1996) Survey of reference materials -- Volume 2: Environmentally related reference materials for trace elements, nuclides and microcontaminants. A report prepared by the International Atomic Energy Agency in co-operation with the United Nations Environment Programme. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency (Document IAEA-TECDOC-880). http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc214.htm Page 245 of 284 6/1/2007
Page 1 and 2:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT UNITED NA
Page 3 and 4:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PREAMBLE
Page 5 and 6:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6.6.2. Un
Page 7 and 8:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 10.6.7. B
Page 9 and 10:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (iv) to p
Page 11 and 12:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Organizat
Page 13 and 14:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WHO TASK
Page 15 and 16:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Dr M. You
Page 17 and 18:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Environme
Page 19 and 20:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT increase
Page 21 and 22:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT character
Page 23 and 24:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT include e
Page 25 and 26:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT http://ww
Page 27 and 28:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the carri
Page 29 and 30:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the ideal
Page 31 and 32:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT continuum
Page 33 and 34:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT as well a
Page 35 and 36:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT In regula
Page 37 and 38:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Results o
Page 39 and 40:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Risk miti
Page 41 and 42:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT trends of
Page 43 and 44:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Knowledge
Page 45 and 46:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT small tow
Page 47 and 48:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT * selecti
Page 49 and 50:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT provide s
Page 51 and 52:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the water
Page 53 and 54:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Public po
Page 55 and 56:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT character
Page 57 and 58:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PbB PbF P
Page 59 and 60:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT values in
Page 61 and 62:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT lead meas
Page 63 and 64:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Continuou
Page 65 and 66:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT logarithm
Page 67 and 68:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT events in
Page 69 and 70:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT -1.751 0.
Page 71 and 72:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT one is a
Page 73 and 74:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT house dus
Page 75 and 76:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PM 2.5 co
Page 77 and 78:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 4.5 Non-p
Page 79 and 80:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT season, r
Page 81 and 82:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Table 15.
Page 83 and 84:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Activity
Page 85 and 86:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Similarly
Page 87 and 88:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT local con
Page 89 and 90:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Environme
Page 91 and 92:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT for tempo
Page 93 and 94:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT devices,
Page 95 and 96:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Using a d
Page 97 and 98:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (gases an
Page 99 and 100:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Dermal ab
Page 101 and 102:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Models de
Page 103 and 104:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT partition
Page 105 and 106:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6.6.1 Var
Page 107 and 108:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Probabili
Page 109 and 110:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The ADD i
Page 111 and 112:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 7.1 Intro
Page 113 and 114:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT suitabili
Page 115 and 116:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Carbon mo
Page 117 and 118:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Samplin I
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT TSI Flowr
Page 123 and 124:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 2 litre/m
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT or increa
Page 129 and 130:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Fluosilic
Page 131 and 132:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT dependent
Page 133 and 134:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT basket su
Page 135 and 136:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT reasonabl
Page 137 and 138:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT There are
Page 139 and 140:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT predesign
Page 141 and 142:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT field wou
Page 143 and 144:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT samples v
Page 145 and 146:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT dust to,
Page 147 and 148:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Choosing
Page 149 and 150:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT others sh
Page 151 and 152:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT sampling
Page 153 and 154:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of house
Page 155 and 156:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Individua
Page 157 and 158:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT subject o
Page 159 and 160:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT same assa
Page 161 and 162:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT high-volu
Page 163 and 164:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Immunoche
Page 165 and 166:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 9.5.1 Air
Page 167 and 168:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT measureme
Page 169 and 170:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT By their
Page 171 and 172:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT possess a
Page 173 and 174:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT factors (
Page 175 and 176:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Improved
Page 177 and 178:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT limited.
Page 179 and 180:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Media Che
Page 181 and 182:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of venipu
Page 183 and 184:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Glands at
Page 185 and 186:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT breast-fe
Page 187 and 188:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT equipment
Page 189 and 190:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT only nume
Page 191 and 192:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT procedure
Page 193 and 194: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT clearly p
Page 195 and 196: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The Shewh
Page 197 and 198: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of statis
Page 199 and 200: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT as closel
Page 201 and 202: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT operation
Page 203 and 204: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT reports o
Page 205 and 206: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Indoor Ai
Page 207 and 208: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (calcium,
Page 209 and 210: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 1984; Akl
Page 211 and 212: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT chemilumi
Page 213 and 214: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT carried o
Page 215 and 216: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT beverages
Page 217 and 218: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Total 11
Page 219 and 220: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of mean c
Page 221 and 222: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 30 µg/dl
Page 223 and 224: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The shell
Page 225 and 226: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 12.5 Expo
Page 227 and 228: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT treatment
Page 229 and 230: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Aeration
Page 231 and 232: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT downwind
Page 233 and 234: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Governmen
Page 235 and 236: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Bercini D
Page 237 and 238: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Callahan
Page 239 and 240: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Centers f
Page 241 and 242: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Report of
Page 243: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Goldstein
Page 247 and 248: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Jimenez R
Page 249 and 250: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Seemayer
Page 251 and 252: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT carbon mo
Page 253 and 254: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT order sta
Page 255 and 256: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Lake, Nor
Page 257 and 258: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT effects o
Page 259 and 260: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Saraf A,
Page 261 and 262: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Silbergel
Page 263 and 264: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT retrospec
Page 265 and 266: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT UN ESCAP
Page 267 and 268: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT National
Page 269 and 270: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Wallace L
Page 271 and 272: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WHO (1995
Page 273 and 274: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT RÉSUMÉ
Page 275 and 276: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT le point
Page 277 and 278: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT chercher
Page 279 and 280: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT tóxica a
Page 281 and 282: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6. Modeli
Page 283 and 284: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT ambiental
show all

Environmental Health Criteria 214

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?