Environmental Health Criteria 214

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Press. Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques, 3rd ed. New York, John Wiley & Sons. Cohen Y & Ryan PA (1985) Multimedia modelling of environmental transport: Trichloroethylene test case. Environ Sci Technol, 9: 412-417. Cohen Y, Tsai W, Chetty SL, & Mayer GL (1990) Dynamic partitioning of organic chemicals in regional environments: A multimedia screening-level approach. Environ Sci Technol, 24: 1549-1558. Colloff MJ (1991) Practical and theoretical aspects of the ecology of house dust mites (Acari: Pyroglyphidae) in relation to the study of mite-mediated allergy. Rev Med Vet Entomol, 79: 611-630. Colome SC, Wilson AL, & Tian Y (1994) California residential indoor air quality study -- Volume 2: Carbon monoxide and air exchange rate: a univariate and multivariate analysis. Irvine, California, Integrated Environmental Services. Connell DW, Hawker DW, Warne MS, & Vowles PP (1997) Basic concepts of environmental chemistry. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press Inc. Cooke TF (1991) Indoor air pollutants: A literature review. Rev Environ Health, 9(3): 137-160. Cox LA (1996) Reassessing benzene risks using internal doses and Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis. Environ Health Perspect, 104(suppl 6): 1413-1429. Cullen MR (1989) The role of clinical investigations in biological markers research. Environ Res, 50: 1-10. Dabbs JM (1991) Salivary testosterone measurements: collecting, storing, and mailing saliva samples. Physiol Behav, 49: 815-817. Dabbs JM (1993) Salivary testosterone measurements in behavioral studies. Ann NY Acad Sci, 694: 177-183. Daisey JM, Cheney JL, & Lioy PJ (1986) Profiles of organic particulate emissions from air pollution sources: status and needs for receptor source apportionment modelling. J Air Pollut Control Assoc, 36(1): 17-33. Davies D & Mes J (1987) Comparison of the residue levels of some organochlorine compounds in breast milk of the general and indigenous Canadian populations. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol, 39: 743-749. Davies DJA, Thornton I, Watt JM, Culbard EB, Harvey PG, Delves HT, Sherlock JC, Smart GA, Thomas JFA, & Quinn MJ (1990) Lead intake and blood lead in two-year-old UK urban children. Sci Total Environ, 90: 13-29. Dean AG, Dean JA, Coulombier D, Brendel KA, Smith DC, Burton AH, Dicker RC, Sullivan K, Fagan RF, & Arner TG (1995) Epi Info, version 6: A word-processing, database, and statistics program for public health on IBM-compatible microcomputers. Atlanta, Georgia, US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc214.htm Page 238 of 284 6/1/2007
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Centers for Disease Control. Atlanta, Georgia, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. De Blay F, Chapman MD, & Platts-Mills TAE (1991) Airborne cat allergen (Fel d I): Environmental control with the cat in situ. Am Rev Respir Dis, 143: 1334-1339. De Bortoli M, Knoeppel M, Pecchio E, Peil A, & Rogora L (1986) Measurement of indoor air quality and comparison with ambient air: A study in 15 homes in Northern Italy. Gov Rep Announc Index, 8. DeRosa CT, Stevens Y-W, Wilson JD, Ademoyero AA, Buchanan SD, Cibulas W Jr, Duerksen-Hughes PJ, Mumtaz MM, Neft RE, Pohl HR, & Williams-Johnson MM (1993) The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's role in development and application of biomarkers in public health practice. Toxicol Ind Health, 9: 979-994. Diemel JAL, Brunekreef B, Boleij JSM, Biersteker K, & Veenstra SJ (1981) The Arnhem lead study. II. Indoor pollution, and indoor/outdoor relationships. Environ Res, 25: 449-456. DiVincenzo GD, Giordano CJ, & Schriever LS (1985) Biologic monitoring of workers exposed to silver. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 56: 207-215. Doi R, Raghupathy L, Ohno H, Naganuma A, Imura N, & Harada M (1988) A study of the sources of external metal contamination of hair. Sci Total Environ, 77: 153-161. Douglas A (1973) Home-based trip end models -- A comparison between category analysis and regression analysis procedures. Transportation, 2: 53-70. Douwes J, Versloot P, Hollander A, Heederik D, & Doekes G (1995) Influence of various dust sampling and extraction methods on the measurement of airborne endotoxin. Appl Environ Microbiol, 61: 1763-1769. Dreborg S, Einarsson R, Lau S, Munir AKM, & Wahn U (1995) Dust sampling for determination of allergen content. Allergy, 50: 188-189. Driver JH, Konz JJ, & Whitmyre GK (1989) Soil adherence to skin. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol, 43(6): 814-820. Droz PO (1992) Quantification of biological variability. Ann Occup Hyg, 36: 295-306. Droz PO (1993) Pharmacokinetic modelling as a tool for biological monitoring. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 65: S53-S59. Droz PO & Wu MM (1991) Biological monitoring strategies. In: Rappaport SM & Smith TJ ed. Exposure assessment for epidemiology and hazard control. Chelsea, Michigan, Lewis Publishers, pp 251-270. Duan N (1982) Models for human exposure to air pollution. Environ Int, 8: 305-309. Dybendal T, Vik H, & Elsayed S (1989) Dust from carpeted and smooth floors: II. Antigenic and allergenic content of dust vacuumed from carpeted and smooth floors under routine cleaning schedules. Allergy, http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc214.htm Page 239 of 284 6/1/2007
Page 1 and 2:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT UNITED NA
Page 3 and 4:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PREAMBLE
Page 5 and 6:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6.6.2. Un
Page 7 and 8:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 10.6.7. B
Page 9 and 10:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (iv) to p
Page 11 and 12:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Organizat
Page 13 and 14:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WHO TASK
Page 15 and 16:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Dr M. You
Page 17 and 18:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Environme
Page 19 and 20:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT increase
Page 21 and 22:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT character
Page 23 and 24:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT include e
Page 25 and 26:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT http://ww
Page 27 and 28:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the carri
Page 29 and 30:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the ideal
Page 31 and 32:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT continuum
Page 33 and 34:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT as well a
Page 35 and 36:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT In regula
Page 37 and 38:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Results o
Page 39 and 40:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Risk miti
Page 41 and 42:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT trends of
Page 43 and 44:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Knowledge
Page 45 and 46:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT small tow
Page 47 and 48:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT * selecti
Page 49 and 50:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT provide s
Page 51 and 52:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the water
Page 53 and 54:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Public po
Page 55 and 56:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT character
Page 57 and 58:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PbB PbF P
Page 59 and 60:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT values in
Page 61 and 62:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT lead meas
Page 63 and 64:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Continuou
Page 65 and 66:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT logarithm
Page 67 and 68:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT events in
Page 69 and 70:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT -1.751 0.
Page 71 and 72:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT one is a
Page 73 and 74:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT house dus
Page 75 and 76:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PM 2.5 co
Page 77 and 78:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 4.5 Non-p
Page 79 and 80:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT season, r
Page 81 and 82:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Table 15.
Page 83 and 84:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Activity
Page 85 and 86:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Similarly
Page 87 and 88:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT local con
Page 89 and 90:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Environme
Page 91 and 92:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT for tempo
Page 93 and 94:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT devices,
Page 95 and 96:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Using a d
Page 97 and 98:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (gases an
Page 99 and 100:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Dermal ab
Page 101 and 102:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Models de
Page 103 and 104:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT partition
Page 105 and 106:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6.6.1 Var
Page 107 and 108:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Probabili
Page 109 and 110:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The ADD i
Page 111 and 112:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 7.1 Intro
Page 113 and 114:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT suitabili
Page 115 and 116:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Carbon mo
Page 117 and 118:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Samplin I
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT TSI Flowr
Page 123 and 124:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 2 litre/m
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT or increa
Page 129 and 130:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Fluosilic
Page 131 and 132:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT dependent
Page 133 and 134:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT basket su
Page 135 and 136:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT reasonabl
Page 137 and 138:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT There are
Page 139 and 140:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT predesign
Page 141 and 142:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT field wou
Page 143 and 144:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT samples v
Page 145 and 146:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT dust to,
Page 147 and 148:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Choosing
Page 149 and 150:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT others sh
Page 151 and 152:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT sampling
Page 153 and 154:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of house
Page 155 and 156:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Individua
Page 157 and 158:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT subject o
Page 159 and 160:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT same assa
Page 161 and 162:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT high-volu
Page 163 and 164:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Immunoche
Page 165 and 166:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 9.5.1 Air
Page 167 and 168:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT measureme
Page 169 and 170:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT By their
Page 171 and 172:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT possess a
Page 173 and 174:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT factors (
Page 175 and 176:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Improved
Page 177 and 178:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT limited.
Page 179 and 180:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Media Che
Page 181 and 182:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of venipu
Page 183 and 184:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Glands at
Page 185 and 186:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT breast-fe
Page 187 and 188: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT equipment
Page 189 and 190: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT only nume
Page 191 and 192: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT procedure
Page 193 and 194: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT clearly p
Page 195 and 196: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The Shewh
Page 197 and 198: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of statis
Page 199 and 200: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT as closel
Page 201 and 202: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT operation
Page 203 and 204: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT reports o
Page 205 and 206: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Indoor Ai
Page 207 and 208: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (calcium,
Page 209 and 210: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 1984; Akl
Page 211 and 212: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT chemilumi
Page 213 and 214: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT carried o
Page 215 and 216: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT beverages
Page 217 and 218: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Total 11
Page 219 and 220: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of mean c
Page 221 and 222: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 30 µg/dl
Page 223 and 224: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The shell
Page 225 and 226: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 12.5 Expo
Page 227 and 228: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT treatment
Page 229 and 230: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Aeration
Page 231 and 232: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT downwind
Page 233 and 234: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Governmen
Page 235 and 236: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Bercini D
Page 237: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Callahan
Page 241 and 242: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Report of
Page 243 and 244: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Goldstein
Page 245 and 246: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (1996) [E
Page 247 and 248: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Jimenez R
Page 249 and 250: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Seemayer
Page 251 and 252: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT carbon mo
Page 253 and 254: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT order sta
Page 255 and 256: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Lake, Nor
Page 257 and 258: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT effects o
Page 259 and 260: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Saraf A,
Page 261 and 262: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Silbergel
Page 263 and 264: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT retrospec
Page 265 and 266: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT UN ESCAP
Page 267 and 268: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT National
Page 269 and 270: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Wallace L
Page 271 and 272: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WHO (1995
Page 273 and 274: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT RÉSUMÉ
Page 275 and 276: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT le point
Page 277 and 278: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT chercher
Page 279 and 280: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT tóxica a
Page 281 and 282: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6. Modeli
Page 283 and 284: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT ambiental
show all

Environmental Health Criteria 214

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?