Environmental Health Criteria 214

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT and nonpatients in cancer studies, with a Malaysian example. Econ Geogr, 52: 161-167. Aschengrau A, Beiser A, Bellinger A, Copenhafer D, & Weitzman M (1994) The impact of soil lead abatement on urban children's blood lead levels: Phase II results from the Boston lead-in-soil demonstration project. Environ Res, 67(2): 125-148. ASTM (1993) Standard practice for collection of dust from carpeted floors for chemical analysis, Method D 5438-93. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, American Society for Testing and Materials. Aurand K, Drews M, & Seifert B (1983) A passive sampler for the determination of the heavy metal burden of indoor environments. Environ Technol Lett, 4, 4333-4440. Baselt RC (1988) Biological monitoring methods for industrial chemicals, 2nd ed. Littleton, Massachusetts, PSG Publishing Company Inc. Bates MN, Smith AH, & Cantor KP (1995) Case-control study of bladder cancer and arsenic in drinking water. Am J Epidemiol, 141(6): 523-530. Beaglehole R, Bonita R, & Kjellstrom T (1993) Basic epidemiology. Geneva, World Health Organization. Bean J-JA, Isacson P, Hahne RM, & Kohler J (1982) Drinking water and cancer incidence in Iowa. II. Radioactivity in drinking water Am J Epidemiol, 116: 924-932. Bear J & Verruijt A (1987) Modelling groundwater flow and pollution. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Reidel D. Publishing Company. Becker K, Müsslig-Zufika M, Hoffmann K, Krause C, Meyer E, Nöllke P, Schulz C, & Seiwert M (1997) [Environmental survey (GerES) 1990/92 -- Volume V. Drinking water: Trace elements in drinking water used by the German population.] Berlin, Institute for Water, Soil and Air Hygiene (in German). Bell RW, Chapman RE, Kruschel BD, & Spencer MJ (1994) Windsor air quality study: personal exposure survey results. Windsor, Ontario, Queen's Printer. Bellinger D, Leviton A, Rabinowitz M, Needleman H, & Waternaux C (1986) Correlates of low level lead exposure in urban children. Pediatrics, 77: 826-833. Bencko V (1991) Biological monitoring of environmental pollution and resulting human exposure to trace metals by hair analysis. In: Dillon HK & Ho MH ed. Biological monitoring of exposure to chemicals: Metals. New York, John Wiley & Sons, pp 243-254. Bencko V (1995) Use of human hair as a biomarker in the assessment of exposure to pollutants in occupational and environmental settings. Toxicology, 101: 29-39. Bencko V, Geist T, Arbetova D, Dharmadikari DM, & Svandova E (1986) Biological monitoring of environmental pollution and human exposure to some trace elements. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol, 30: 1-10. http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc214.htm Page 234 of 284 6/1/2007
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Bercini DH (1992) Pretesting questionnaires in the laboratory: an alternative approach. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, 2(2): 241-248. Berglund M, Braback L, Bylin G, Jonson JO, & Vahter M (1994a) Personal NO2 exposure monitoring shows high exposure among ice-skating schoolchildren. Arch Environ Health, 49: 17-24. Berglund M, Akesson A, Nermell B, & Vahter M (1994b) Intestinal absorption of dietary cadmium in women depends on body iron stores and fiber intake. Environ Health Perspect, 102: 1058-1066. Bernard AM (1995) Biokinetics and stability aspects of biomarkers: recommendations for applications in population studies. Toxicology, 101: 65-71. Bernard AM & Lauwerys RR (1986) Assessment of human exposure to chemicals through biological monitoring. In: Kopfler FC & Craun GF ed. Environmental epidemiology. Chelsea, Michigan, Lewis Publishers Inc., pp 17-28. Berry M (1992) Strategy for a dietary exposure research program. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, 1(suppl): 97-110. Bevington PR (1969) Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences. New York, McGraw-Hill, pp 57-65. Bihl DE, Buschbom RL, & Sula MJ (1993) Experience with a routine fecal sampling program for plutonium workers. Health Phys, 65: 550-5. Binder S, Sokal D, & Maughan D (1986) Estimating soil ingestion: The use of tracer elements in estimating the amount of soil ingested by young children. Arch Environ Health, 41: 341-345. Binkova B, Lewtas J, Miskova I, Lenicek J, & Sram R (1995) DNA adducts and personal air monitoring of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in an environmentally exposed population. Carcinogenesis, 16(5):1037-1046. Bischoff ERC, Fischer A, & Liebenberg B (1992) Assessment of mite numbers: new methods and results. Exp Appl Acarol, 16: 1-14. Bogen KT & Spear RC (1987) Integrating uncertainty and interindividual variability in environmental risk assessment. Risk Anal, 7(4): 427-436. Bond JA, Wallace LA, Osterman-Golkar S, Lucier GW, Buckpitt A, & Henderson RF (1992) Assessment of exposure to pulmonary toxicants: Use of biological markers. Fundam Appl Toxicol, 18: 161-174. Bookout RL, Quinn DW, & McDougal JN (1997) Parallel dermal subcompartments for modelling chemical absorption. SAR QSAR Environ Res, 7(1-4): 259-279. Bornschein RL, Succop P, Dietrich KN, Clark CS, Que Hee S, & Hammond PB (1985) The influence of social and environmental factors on dust lead, hand lead, and blood lead levels in young children. Environ Res, 38(1): 108-118. Bostrom C, Spengler JD, Özkaynak H, & Lefkopoulou M (1991) Commuter exposures to VOCs in Boston, Massachusetts. J Air Waste Manage Assoc, http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc214.htm Page 235 of 284 6/1/2007
Page 1 and 2:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT UNITED NA
Page 3 and 4:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PREAMBLE
Page 5 and 6:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6.6.2. Un
Page 7 and 8:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 10.6.7. B
Page 9 and 10:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (iv) to p
Page 11 and 12:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Organizat
Page 13 and 14:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WHO TASK
Page 15 and 16:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Dr M. You
Page 17 and 18:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Environme
Page 19 and 20:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT increase
Page 21 and 22:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT character
Page 23 and 24:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT include e
Page 25 and 26:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT http://ww
Page 27 and 28:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the carri
Page 29 and 30:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the ideal
Page 31 and 32:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT continuum
Page 33 and 34:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT as well a
Page 35 and 36:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT In regula
Page 37 and 38:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Results o
Page 39 and 40:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Risk miti
Page 41 and 42:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT trends of
Page 43 and 44:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Knowledge
Page 45 and 46:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT small tow
Page 47 and 48:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT * selecti
Page 49 and 50:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT provide s
Page 51 and 52:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT the water
Page 53 and 54:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Public po
Page 55 and 56:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT character
Page 57 and 58:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PbB PbF P
Page 59 and 60:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT values in
Page 61 and 62:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT lead meas
Page 63 and 64:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Continuou
Page 65 and 66:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT logarithm
Page 67 and 68:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT events in
Page 69 and 70:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT -1.751 0.
Page 71 and 72:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT one is a
Page 73 and 74:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT house dus
Page 75 and 76:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PM 2.5 co
Page 77 and 78:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 4.5 Non-p
Page 79 and 80:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT season, r
Page 81 and 82:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Table 15.
Page 83 and 84:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Activity
Page 85 and 86:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Similarly
Page 87 and 88:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT local con
Page 89 and 90:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Environme
Page 91 and 92:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT for tempo
Page 93 and 94:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT devices,
Page 95 and 96:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Using a d
Page 97 and 98:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (gases an
Page 99 and 100:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Dermal ab
Page 101 and 102:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Models de
Page 103 and 104:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT partition
Page 105 and 106:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6.6.1 Var
Page 107 and 108:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Probabili
Page 109 and 110:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The ADD i
Page 111 and 112:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 7.1 Intro
Page 113 and 114:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT suitabili
Page 115 and 116:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Carbon mo
Page 117 and 118:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Samplin I
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT TSI Flowr
Page 123 and 124:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 2 litre/m
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT or increa
Page 129 and 130:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Fluosilic
Page 131 and 132:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT dependent
Page 133 and 134:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT basket su
Page 135 and 136:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT reasonabl
Page 137 and 138:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT There are
Page 139 and 140:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT predesign
Page 141 and 142:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT field wou
Page 143 and 144:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT samples v
Page 145 and 146:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT dust to,
Page 147 and 148:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Choosing
Page 149 and 150:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT others sh
Page 151 and 152:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT sampling
Page 153 and 154:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of house
Page 155 and 156:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Individua
Page 157 and 158:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT subject o
Page 159 and 160:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT same assa
Page 161 and 162:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT high-volu
Page 163 and 164:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Immunoche
Page 165 and 166:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 9.5.1 Air
Page 167 and 168:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT measureme
Page 169 and 170:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT By their
Page 171 and 172:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT possess a
Page 173 and 174:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT factors (
Page 175 and 176:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Improved
Page 177 and 178:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT limited.
Page 179 and 180:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Media Che
Page 181 and 182:
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of venipu
Page 183 and 184: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Glands at
Page 185 and 186: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT breast-fe
Page 187 and 188: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT equipment
Page 189 and 190: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT only nume
Page 191 and 192: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT procedure
Page 193 and 194: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT clearly p
Page 195 and 196: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The Shewh
Page 197 and 198: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of statis
Page 199 and 200: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT as closel
Page 201 and 202: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT operation
Page 203 and 204: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT reports o
Page 205 and 206: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Indoor Ai
Page 207 and 208: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (calcium,
Page 209 and 210: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 1984; Akl
Page 211 and 212: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT chemilumi
Page 213 and 214: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT carried o
Page 215 and 216: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT beverages
Page 217 and 218: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Total 11
Page 219 and 220: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT of mean c
Page 221 and 222: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 30 µg/dl
Page 223 and 224: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The shell
Page 225 and 226: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 12.5 Expo
Page 227 and 228: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT treatment
Page 229 and 230: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Aeration
Page 231 and 232: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT downwind
Page 233: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Governmen
Page 237 and 238: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Callahan
Page 239 and 240: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Centers f
Page 241 and 242: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Report of
Page 243 and 244: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Goldstein
Page 245 and 246: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT (1996) [E
Page 247 and 248: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Jimenez R
Page 249 and 250: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Seemayer
Page 251 and 252: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT carbon mo
Page 253 and 254: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT order sta
Page 255 and 256: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Lake, Nor
Page 257 and 258: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT effects o
Page 259 and 260: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Saraf A,
Page 261 and 262: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Silbergel
Page 263 and 264: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT retrospec
Page 265 and 266: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT UN ESCAP
Page 267 and 268: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT National
Page 269 and 270: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Wallace L
Page 271 and 272: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WHO (1995
Page 273 and 274: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT RÉSUMÉ
Page 275 and 276: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT le point
Page 277 and 278: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT chercher
Page 279 and 280: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT tóxica a
Page 281 and 282: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 6. Modeli
Page 283 and 284: HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT ambiental
show all

Environmental Health Criteria 214

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?