12.02.2013 Views

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />

pesticides used indoors were mainly taken via inhalation.<br />

The chlorinated hydrocarbons chlordane, heptachlor, aldrin and<br />

dieldrin were calculated to have the largest risk for health effects,<br />

although all but heptachlor and aldrin had negligible risks.<br />

Heptachlor and aldrin had excess lifetime cancer risks of 2 × 10- 4<br />

and 1 × 10- 4 respectively in Jacksonville, despite having been banned<br />

for many years.<br />

12.7.5 Czech study of air pollution impact on human health<br />

The aim of the Teplice programme has been to conduct a<br />

multi-end-point air monitoring and human biomonitoring study to assess<br />

the impact of air pollution on population health in the district of<br />

Teplice, Czech Republic (Sram et al., 1996). Particulate and gaseous<br />

air pollutants were measured in Teplice and in the control region<br />

Prachatice. PM 2.5 and PM 10 composition and toxic metals as well as<br />

concentrations of PAHs were measured daily in winter and periodically<br />

during the spring/summer season. The concentrations of all pollutants<br />

measured were significantly higher in winter compared to spring and<br />

summer. Average fine particle mass in Teplice was 122 µg/m 3 compared<br />

to 44 µg/m 3 in Prachatice during the winter of 1993, and 28.7 µg/m 3<br />

and 17 µg/m 3 respectively, in spring/summer. Total PAH concentrations<br />

in Teplice in winter were approximately twice as high as in Prachatice<br />

(278 versus 163 ng/m 3 ). Evaluation of the benzo [a]pyrene to lead<br />

ratio in Teplice over time indicated the presence of at least two<br />

sources of PAHs. During the summer when mobile sources are the major<br />

contributor to benzo [a]pyrene, the ratio was about 0.01. During<br />

winter, when the ratio was 0.05 to 0.15, emission from inefficient<br />

combustion of brown coal in domestic heating systems is considered to<br />

be the most likely source of PAHs.<br />

Personal exposure and biomarkers were measured with the objective<br />

of simultaneously evaluating personal exposure to air pollution and<br />

internal measures of dose and genetic effects and susceptibility using<br />

a series of biomarkers. PAHs were selected as the pollutant marker for<br />

monitoring personal exposure. A group of 30 women working outdoors in<br />

Teplice district was compared with a group of 30 women from the<br />

Prachatice district. Personal exposure monitoring (PM 2.5 ) was<br />

conducted for the 24-h period prior to collection of blood and urine.<br />

High correlation were observed between the mass of fine particles and<br />

personal exposure to total carcinogenic PAHs and benzo [a]pyrene.<br />

Significant correlations were observed between the personal exposures<br />

to PM 2.5 or carcinogenic PAHs and blood lead and blood selenium. The<br />

urinary PAH metabolites, adjusted for creatinine content, were also<br />

significantly correlated with PM 2.5 or PAHs. Significant correlations<br />

were found between personal exposure to carcinogenic PAHs and white<br />

blood cell DNA adduct level.<br />

The results consistently suggested that elevated levels of<br />

airborne fine particle pollution could result in measurable uptake,<br />

metabolism and cellular DNA damage in a population exposed to high<br />

concentrations, even for a short-term winter inversion period.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ACGIH (1989) Guidelines for the assessment of bioaerosols in the<br />

indoor environment. Cincinnati, Ohio, American Conference of<br />

http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />

Page 232 of 284<br />

6/1/2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!