12.02.2013 Views

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />

chemiluminescence monitors. The distance from each daycare centre to<br />

the nearest monitoring site varied from 0.5 to 11 km.<br />

The geometric mean of personal nitrogen dioxide exposure levels<br />

of in the total 13-week period was 26.5 µg/m 3 in the downtown area<br />

and 17.5 µg/m 3 in the suburban area. These exposure levels were<br />

significantly lower than ambient air levels of nitrogen dioxide in the<br />

same areas. Gas cooking stove or/and smoking at home significantly<br />

increased personal exposure to nitrogen dioxide. The weekly exposures<br />

averaged over all children in each daycare centre correlated poorly<br />

with the fixed site ambient air levels ( r 2 = 0.37), but much better<br />

with the nitrogen dioxide levels inside and outside the daycare<br />

centres ( r 2 = 0.88 and 0.86, respectively). In the suburban and<br />

downtown groups the between-child variances in nitrogen dioxide<br />

exposures were only 14% and 28% of the total variances, which were<br />

dominated by the within-child variances.<br />

Stationary measurements at the ambient air fixed sites and inside<br />

and outside the daycare centres explained the variations in personal<br />

nitrogen dioxide exposures of the children well during the spring, but<br />

not during the winter. A statistical model, where data from outside<br />

daycare centre measurements, fixed ambient air monitors, residential<br />

area and home characteristics (i.e., gas cooking stove, smoking inside<br />

at home, type of dwelling) were included, explained only 32% of the<br />

personal exposure variations in winter, but 67% in spring.<br />

There were significantly more days with stuffed nose (26% versus<br />

20%) and cough (18% versus 15%) in the downtown area than in the<br />

suburban area. The observed risk of cough was highest and<br />

statistically significantly increased compared to the levels of<br />

personal nitrogen dioxide. Also, when using daycare centre<br />

measurements or fixed site ambient air data for exposure assessment,<br />

there was a positive trend between nitrogen dioxide exposure and cough<br />

in winter these associations were, however, weaker and<br />

non-significant.<br />

According to the result of the study, exposure to nitrogen<br />

dioxide should be measured using personal exposure measurements when<br />

studying health effects of the gas in non-symptomatic children in<br />

areas with low nitrogen dioxide levels. Even personal exposure<br />

measurements using weekly averages, however, may not adequately<br />

reflect all biologically relevant exposure, e.g., short-term peak<br />

concentrations. The most significant determinants of the personal<br />

nitrogen dioxide exposures of the children in Helsinki are living in<br />

downtown rather than in a suburban area, gas versus electric cooking<br />

stove and smoking in the home. However, even all risk factors together<br />

did not increase the personal exposures of downtown children up to<br />

suburban outdoor air levels.<br />

12.3.4 Ozone<br />

The UC Berkeley Ozone project (USA) is an example of an<br />

epidemiological study addressing long-term effects of lifetime ambient<br />

oxidant pollution on pulmonary function (Tager et al., 1998a,b). A<br />

major purpose was to address the feasibility of improving ozone<br />

exposure assignment by means of collecting lifetime information on<br />

relevant time-activity patterns to exposure, in combination with fixed<br />

site ambient air monitoring data. Individual factors considered to be<br />

relevant for exposure were:<br />

http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />

Page 211 of 284<br />

6/1/2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!