Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />
household visits and interviews may not be kept as the field personnel<br />
expect.<br />
A good approach for identifying problems and alternatives is the<br />
use of pilot studies before full implementations of the field<br />
component of a study. In pilot studies, trained staff perform the<br />
complete set of SOPs established for the full investigation on a small<br />
subset of the sample population. Thus, pilot studies also have the<br />
purpose of effectively providing final training of all field<br />
personnel. The information collected during these studies is very<br />
useful for adjusting the study plan and SOPs for local conditions. It<br />
is important that all personnel participating in a field study, i.e.,<br />
study design personnel, principal and co-investigators, laboratory<br />
staff and field personnel require practical experience with the local<br />
field conditions. Pilot studies provide the means to obtain such<br />
experience.<br />
Another potential confounder in population studies is the<br />
Hawthorne effect; that is, the alteration of behaviour patterns that<br />
might affect exposures as a result of participation in the study. For<br />
example, many population-based field studies provide compensation to<br />
individuals who agree to participate. Monetary compensation could<br />
alter behaviour patterns that may affect exposure: for example, the<br />
participant may decide not to go to work (a typical activity) the day<br />
he receives the payment and instead spend the time performing an<br />
activity that is not customary. This problem can be resolved by<br />
offering the payment a short time after the participants have<br />
completed the monitoring period. The presence of an environmental<br />
monitor (e.g., an air sampling inlet and pump) may cause participants<br />
to avoid situations in which they may feel conspicuous, such as their<br />
place of employment. An innovative approach for assessing the<br />
influence of this effect is to expand the study to include a subsample<br />
of participants who engage in only a portion of the study (e.g., a<br />
time-activity questionnaire) and to compare the results for this group<br />
to those for the remainder of the population that completed the full<br />
monitoring programme.<br />
11.7 Summary<br />
QA includes independent study monitoring that assures laboratory<br />
management and users of data that facilities, equipment, personnel,<br />
methods, practices, records and controls confirm to accepted quality<br />
management principles. Errors in exposure data may be due to<br />
analytical variation as well as changes that may take place during<br />
sample collection and handling, preparation and storage of samples,<br />
and data keeping and data recording. Analytical variation can be<br />
divided into two major categories: accuracy, which refers to the<br />
agreement between the amount of analyte measured and the amount<br />
actually present, and precision, which refers to the random<br />
variability or reproducibility of the method.<br />
The study plan is the most important document for providing<br />
information on the critical components of an investigation, e.g.,<br />
responsible personnel, sample collection, sample storage and<br />
pre-analytical treatment, analytical procedures and data analysis.<br />
SOPs are appended to the study plan and contain written detailed<br />
instructions on how to perform certain routine field and laboratory<br />
activities. The study plan and SOPs can be seen as management<br />
directives designed to ensure that all personnel associated with study<br />
http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />
Page 200 of 284<br />
6/1/2007