12.02.2013 Views

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />

materials and tools coming into contact with the samples.<br />

Samples must be handled and stored in such a way that the level<br />

of the substance to be analysed remains stable. Processes that are<br />

most likely to decrease sample stability include precipitation,<br />

chemical deterioration (e.g., photolysis), surface absorption and<br />

evaporation of the analyte. Another factor that could be important is<br />

changes in the matrix, which may affect recovery of the analyte.<br />

11.4.5 Equipment maintenance and calibration<br />

Adequate equipment should be available for the receipt, handling,<br />

storage and analysis of samples. Its maintenance and calibration is<br />

essential to QA practise. Equipment used for analysis must be tested,<br />

calibrated and standardized.<br />

11.4.6 Internal audit and corrective action<br />

Internal audit and corrective action are critical activities in<br />

QA management. Audit procedures are to verify that the procedures are<br />

conducted the way they were planned and described in the study plan.<br />

Non-conformance must to be corrected to attain the study objectives.<br />

11.5 Quality control/quality assurance for sample measurement<br />

11.5.1 Method selection and validation<br />

A chemical compound can usually be analysed by a variety of<br />

different methods. Some methods emphasize quality of analysis, i.e.,<br />

accuracy and precision, whereas others are directed mainly towards<br />

practicality and low cost. However, even the best method may give<br />

incorrect results if improperly used. Methods are customarily<br />

classified according to their main use in the analytical field into<br />

definitive, reference and field routine methods. The best<br />

approximation of the true value obtained by analysis is the<br />

definitive value, i.e., the result obtained by the definitive<br />

method. The definitive method is, however, generally not considered<br />

practicable for daily laboratory use. Therefore, the purpose of a<br />

reference method is often to serve as a basis for the determination<br />

of the accuracy of the field methods. Field methods (or routine<br />

methods) are those in everyday use in the laboratory. They are not<br />

necessarily as precise and accurate as reference and definitive<br />

methods. Their use is justified, however, because the definitive and<br />

reference methods are often too cumbersome and expensive and may not<br />

be available. The precision and bias relating to the method should be<br />

known for every routine method used.<br />

The following data quality specifications have to be validated in<br />

method selection to meet the requirements and objectives of the<br />

exposure assessment project.<br />

11.5.1.1 Accuracy<br />

Accuracy is defined as the closeness of agreement between a test<br />

result and the accepted true value. Accuracy or validity of an<br />

analysis is primarily determined by the specificity of the method and<br />

the analytical recovery.<br />

Fig. 31A illustrates the ideal case where the reported values<br />

correspond exactly to the expected values. However, all analytical<br />

http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />

Page 190 of 284<br />

6/1/2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!