Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />
possess all these characteristics. However, the use of biological<br />
markers for exposure assessment is increasing.<br />
Biological markers represent one type of monitoring approach<br />
available for environmental exposure assessment. Validation of<br />
biomarkers is a complex process that should include determination of:<br />
specificity of the available biological marker, exposure-related<br />
toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics, dose-response relationship,<br />
biological variation associated with the marker, route of exposure and<br />
type of health effect associated with exposure. In addition,<br />
validation should consider behavioural factors that influence<br />
exposure, participant acceptance, feasibility and cost-effectiveness<br />
(Verberk, 1995), as well as biological variability and specificity<br />
within a human population of interest, and generation of baseline or<br />
normative data for the biological marker. These issues are addressed<br />
later in the chapter.<br />
Collection of samples from humans involves important ethical<br />
issues. Ethical concerns may limit the extent of investigations of<br />
chemically exposed individuals and populations (IPCS, 1993). Ensuring<br />
confidentiality both for subjects and for the obtained individual<br />
results is imperative (Schulte, 1992). Subjects have the right to know<br />
the implications of their participation, the analyses to be performed,<br />
the nature of the sampling procedure, the use of the data collected<br />
and the possible ramifications of positive findings. Knowledge of<br />
previous exposure or genetic predisposition may have adverse<br />
implications for an individual; for example, individuals may be denied<br />
health insurance on the basis of presumed future risk. Since<br />
biological markers are a relatively new tool, interpretation of<br />
results and subsequent health implications is difficult. For many<br />
biological markers, little information is available to interpret the<br />
result for the subject; this may lead to concern on the part of the<br />
individual. For example, knowledge of the presence of pesticides in<br />
breast milk may lead an individual to avoid breast-feeding without<br />
consideration of its advantages (Vandenberg, 1991; Sim & McNeil,<br />
1992).<br />
10.3.1 Toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics<br />
Toxicokinetics describes the absorption, distribution, metabolism<br />
and excretion of a contaminant. Understanding the toxicokinetics and<br />
toxicodynamics of the agent is critical for development and use of a<br />
biological marker of exposure (Sampson et al., 1994). This information<br />
predicts the location and form of the chemical or its metabolite and<br />
identifies sources of biological variability in the population (Droz &<br />
Wu, 1991; Droz, 1992, 1993). Toxicokinetic modelling may be used to<br />
estimate the optimal time for sampling (Saltzman, 1988; Droz & Wu,<br />
1991; Droz, 1993). Differing kinetics determine whether the biological<br />
marker reflects recent exposure, historic exposure, or an integrated<br />
measure of exposure over time (Bernard, 1995).<br />
The utility of biological markers for assessing exposure can be<br />
evaluated on the basis of timing of sampling relative to the exposure<br />
and the biological half-life of the chemical. The parameter which best<br />
describes the toxicokinetic behaviour of a chemical in biological<br />
systems is the elimination half-life, which reflects both the<br />
affinity of the chemical for the biological medium and the efficiency<br />
of the processes of elimination (Bernard, 1995). For samples taken<br />
http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />
Page 171 of 284<br />
6/1/2007