12.02.2013 Views

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />

possess all these characteristics. However, the use of biological<br />

markers for exposure assessment is increasing.<br />

Biological markers represent one type of monitoring approach<br />

available for environmental exposure assessment. Validation of<br />

biomarkers is a complex process that should include determination of:<br />

specificity of the available biological marker, exposure-related<br />

toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics, dose-response relationship,<br />

biological variation associated with the marker, route of exposure and<br />

type of health effect associated with exposure. In addition,<br />

validation should consider behavioural factors that influence<br />

exposure, participant acceptance, feasibility and cost-effectiveness<br />

(Verberk, 1995), as well as biological variability and specificity<br />

within a human population of interest, and generation of baseline or<br />

normative data for the biological marker. These issues are addressed<br />

later in the chapter.<br />

Collection of samples from humans involves important ethical<br />

issues. Ethical concerns may limit the extent of investigations of<br />

chemically exposed individuals and populations (IPCS, 1993). Ensuring<br />

confidentiality both for subjects and for the obtained individual<br />

results is imperative (Schulte, 1992). Subjects have the right to know<br />

the implications of their participation, the analyses to be performed,<br />

the nature of the sampling procedure, the use of the data collected<br />

and the possible ramifications of positive findings. Knowledge of<br />

previous exposure or genetic predisposition may have adverse<br />

implications for an individual; for example, individuals may be denied<br />

health insurance on the basis of presumed future risk. Since<br />

biological markers are a relatively new tool, interpretation of<br />

results and subsequent health implications is difficult. For many<br />

biological markers, little information is available to interpret the<br />

result for the subject; this may lead to concern on the part of the<br />

individual. For example, knowledge of the presence of pesticides in<br />

breast milk may lead an individual to avoid breast-feeding without<br />

consideration of its advantages (Vandenberg, 1991; Sim & McNeil,<br />

1992).<br />

10.3.1 Toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics<br />

Toxicokinetics describes the absorption, distribution, metabolism<br />

and excretion of a contaminant. Understanding the toxicokinetics and<br />

toxicodynamics of the agent is critical for development and use of a<br />

biological marker of exposure (Sampson et al., 1994). This information<br />

predicts the location and form of the chemical or its metabolite and<br />

identifies sources of biological variability in the population (Droz &<br />

Wu, 1991; Droz, 1992, 1993). Toxicokinetic modelling may be used to<br />

estimate the optimal time for sampling (Saltzman, 1988; Droz & Wu,<br />

1991; Droz, 1993). Differing kinetics determine whether the biological<br />

marker reflects recent exposure, historic exposure, or an integrated<br />

measure of exposure over time (Bernard, 1995).<br />

The utility of biological markers for assessing exposure can be<br />

evaluated on the basis of timing of sampling relative to the exposure<br />

and the biological half-life of the chemical. The parameter which best<br />

describes the toxicokinetic behaviour of a chemical in biological<br />

systems is the elimination half-life, which reflects both the<br />

affinity of the chemical for the biological medium and the efficiency<br />

of the processes of elimination (Bernard, 1995). For samples taken<br />

http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />

Page 171 of 284<br />

6/1/2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!