12.02.2013 Views

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />

Individual mite allergens can be measured with enzyme-linked<br />

immunosorbent assays (ELISA) or radioimmunoassays (RIA). Sandwich<br />

radio- or enzyme immunoassays employ either rabbit polyclonal or mouse<br />

monoclonal antibody for capture, and a second monoclonal antibody for<br />

detection (see Fig. 25). These assays are more sensitive than RAST.<br />

Those using monoclonal antibodies in particular have also the great<br />

potential advantage of long-term reproducibility. Furthermore, ELISA<br />

assays have been shown to be highly reproducible (e.g., Munir et al.,<br />

1993; Van Strien et al., 1994) and can quantify antigen levels to less<br />

than 1 ng/mg dust.<br />

Immunochemical assays are highly specific and the results<br />

obtained with these assays can be expressed in absolute units of a<br />

defined protein by unit weight of dust or by unit area sampled. They<br />

are suitable for large-scale surveys because they can be automated.<br />

However, a sophisticated laboratory is required.<br />

9.2.3.3 Guanine determination<br />

The third possibility is the measurement of guanine, which is a<br />

nitrogenous excretory product of arachnids, found in house dust. Since<br />

mites are predominant among arachnids in house dust, determination of<br />

guanine content in the dust is an indirect method for assessing mite<br />

allergen levels. Analysis of guanine content is based on a colour<br />

reaction between guanine and an azo compound (Le Mao et al., 1989;<br />

Hoyet et al., 1991). The amounts of guanine can be measured<br />

quantitatively on a weight/weight basis using a spectrophotometer, or<br />

semiquantitatively using a commercially available test kit (Pauli et<br />

al., 1995). The quantitative assay has been reported to demonstrate a<br />

good correlation with the assay of Group 1 allergens (Platts-Mills et<br />

al., 1992), whereas the semiquantitative test was found to be less<br />

sensitive (Lau et al., 1990).<br />

9.2.4 Mite allergens<br />

Sampling strategies may vary depending on objectives but most<br />

http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />

Page 155 of 284<br />

6/1/2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!