Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />
9.2.3 Available methods of analysis for house dust mites<br />
There are three types of method for estimating the concentrations<br />
of house dust mites or their allergens in (airborne) dust samples:<br />
mite counts, immunochemical assays of mite allergen and guanine<br />
determinations. The choice of a particular method depends on the<br />
specific purpose of a study.<br />
9.2.3.1 Mite counts<br />
The prevalence of mites in settled house dust can be determined<br />
by counting under a microscope after separation from the dust sample<br />
by flotation or suspension. This technique permits the identification<br />
of the predominant species and the recognition of live, dead, larval<br />
or adult types. The disadvantages of this method include:<br />
* the need for training and development of skill in determining<br />
different mite species<br />
* the failure to quantify faecal pellets and disintegrated mite<br />
bodies and therefore to reflect the true extent of exposure to mite<br />
allergen levels<br />
* the unsuitability for large-scale (epidemiological) studies owing<br />
to the time-consuming nature of the work (Platts-Mills & De Weck,<br />
1989; EC, 1993).<br />
A further limitation of this method is variation among the actual<br />
extraction techniques. Bischoff et al. (1992) estimates that less than<br />
10% of the mites are removed from the carpet by typical vacuuming<br />
techniques, but this number varies with the type of surface, the type<br />
of vacuum used and the vacuuming technique.<br />
9.2.3.2 Immunochemical assays of dust mite allergens<br />
Immunochemical assays are widely used to measure the<br />
concentrations of house dust-mite allergens. The dust mite germ is<br />
Dermatophogoides and allergens have been identified for three<br />
species. The conventional labelling of these allergens are denoted by<br />
the prefix "Der" followed by a letter indicating the species. These<br />
assays are possible because the major allergens produced by house dust<br />
mites, i.e., the group 1 allergens (Der p I, Der f I, Der m I) and the<br />
group 2 allergens (Der p II, Der f II, Der m II) are well<br />
characterized and purified. For immunochemical analysis, the dust<br />
sample is extracted (e.g., in a buffered saline solution), and then<br />
stored frozen until analysis.<br />
Total mite allergen content can be assessed by<br />
radioallergosorbent tests (RAST). This method provides a good estimate<br />
of the relative potency of different allergen extracts, but cannot be<br />
used for absolute quantification of mite allergen levels. An advantage<br />
of the method is that it measures "relevant" antigenic determinants<br />
that have elicited a response in allergic subjects, since human IgE is<br />
used. Results vary with the composition of the extract used on the<br />
solid phase and with the composition of the serum pool used for<br />
detecting bound allergen. However, RAST inhibition results are<br />
difficult to reproduce over an extended period of time.<br />
http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />
Page 154 of 284<br />
6/1/2007