12.02.2013 Views

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />

of samples to be obtained should be based on these considerations.<br />

8.3.1 Concentration and loading<br />

Almost all settled dust contains measurable levels of common<br />

environmental contaminants such as heavy metals and pesticides, and<br />

most residential surfaces, such as floors and windowsills, contain<br />

settled dust (CDC, 1991). The actual concentration of a target analyte<br />

in a sample of settled dust depends on the amount of dust collected<br />

that does not contain the analyte and the amount of dust collected<br />

that does contain the analyte.<br />

The analyte concentration, sometimes called a mass<br />

concentration, is usually expressed as micrograms of analyte per<br />

gram of dust (µg/g). The amount of dust on a surface can be expressed<br />

as grams of dust per unit area, such as per square metre, and is<br />

usually called dust loading (g/m 2 ). The analyte concentration,<br />

multiplied by the dust loading on a surface, gives a analyte<br />

loading value and is commonly expressed as micrograms of analyte per<br />

unit area (µg/m 2 ). The dust loading and analyte loading measurements<br />

are both area concentrations, that is, the concentration of dust or<br />

contaminant per unit area. In this report, "concentration" refers to<br />

mass concentration and "loading" refers to area concentration.<br />

The example of residential sampling for lead is used to simplify<br />

the discussion. Common wipe sampling methods, such as the HUD method,<br />

measure lead loading directly, without measuring lead concentration<br />

and dust loading. Fig. 24 illustrates what common wipe samples can<br />

measure, using realistic results collected from floors in a<br />

hypothetical residence. Assume that each diagonal line in the figure<br />

represents the lead loading results from one wipe sample. The diagonal<br />

lead loading lines show the infinite number of lead concentration<br />

( y axis) and dust loading ( x axis) combinations that might result<br />

in the measured lead loading. As mentioned earlier, the product of the<br />

two parameters is the lead loading (µg/g × g/m 2 = µg/m 2 ). Using a<br />

log scale on the x and y axes ensures that the infinite number of<br />

combinations that result in the same lead loading value fall on a<br />

straight line. As noted in Chapter 4, the distribution of many<br />

measures of environmental exposure is skewed right and may often be<br />

approximated by a lognormal distribution. For lognormal distributions,<br />

geometric relationships (e.g., factorial) exist among quantiles of the<br />

distribution, in contrast to the linear relationships present in<br />

measures that follow a normal distribution. As described in Chapter 4,<br />

lognormal distributions can be "normalized" in a numerical sense by<br />

expressing the data as the log-transformed values or in a graphical<br />

sense by plotting data on log scales. This example assumes that lead<br />

concentration and dust loading are lognormally distributed and<br />

perfectly correlated with each other, i.e., lead loading in µg<br />

lead/m 2 is assumed to be constant. A scatter plot of two perfectly<br />

correlated and lognormally distributed measures depicted on a normal<br />

scale would exhibit a curved relationship, but appears as a straight<br />

line when depicted on a log scale.<br />

Because common wipe sampling measures lead loading directly, but<br />

does not measure lead concentration and dust loading, the results from<br />

wipe sampling cannot be used to determine which combination of lead<br />

concentration and dust loading is present. Similarly, Davies et al.<br />

(1990) states that for a given contaminant loading value, the<br />

contaminant concentration can range from high where there is little<br />

http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />

Page 144 of 284<br />

6/1/2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!