Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />
reasonable in the context of assessing health effects that may be<br />
caused by cumulative exposure, such as cancer, or reproductive and<br />
developmental effects that may follow a threshold dose-response curve.<br />
Some FFQs include questions on usual food preparation methods,<br />
trimming of meats, use of dietary supplements and identification of<br />
the most common type or brand consumed. FFQs can be used to rank<br />
individuals by exposure to selected chemicals. Although FFQs are not<br />
designed to measure absolute exposure, the method may be more accurate<br />
than other methods for estimating average exposure to chemicals having<br />
large day-to-day variability and for which there are relatively few<br />
food sources. FFQs have several disadvantages too: specifically, they<br />
are less reliable in estimating consumption of rarely consumed foods<br />
and the food lists are often designed to assess nutrients and may<br />
require substantial revision to assess chemical exposures.<br />
7.4.3.4 Meal-based diet history<br />
Meal-based diet history methods are designed to assess usual<br />
individual food consumption. It consists of a detailed listing of the<br />
types of foods and beverages commonly consumed at each meal over a<br />
defined time period which is often a "typical week".<br />
7.4.3.5 Food habit questionnaires<br />
Food habit questionnaires are designed to collect either general<br />
or specific types of information, such as food perception and belief,<br />
food likes and dislikes, methods of preparing foods, use of dietary<br />
supplements and social setting surrounding eating occasions. This type<br />
of information is frequently considered with other methods but may be<br />
used on its own.<br />
Although the last two methods are seldom used in dietary exposure<br />
assessments they can contribute very useful background information and<br />
may be the only information for specific population group issues<br />
(e.g., organic food consumption by vegetarians). They can be targeted<br />
to answer specific questions or prioritize issues of concern and<br />
provide a cost-effective tool for the risk assessor.<br />
Page 135 of 284<br />
Table 28. An example of food listing and frequency response options of an F<br />
For each food listed, fill in the Average use of the last 3 months<br />
circle indicating how often, on<br />
average, you have used the amount Per month Per wee<br />
specified, during the past 3 months<br />
Never or 1-3 1 2-4<br />
less than<br />
once<br />
DAIRY FOODS Skim or low-fat milk<br />
(8 oz glass) 0 0 0 0<br />
Whole milk (8 oz glass) 0 0 0 0<br />
Sherbet or ice milk<br />
(1/2 cup) 0 0 0 0<br />
Ice cream (1/2 cup) 0 0 0 0<br />
http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />
6/1/2007