12.02.2013 Views

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />

reasonable in the context of assessing health effects that may be<br />

caused by cumulative exposure, such as cancer, or reproductive and<br />

developmental effects that may follow a threshold dose-response curve.<br />

Some FFQs include questions on usual food preparation methods,<br />

trimming of meats, use of dietary supplements and identification of<br />

the most common type or brand consumed. FFQs can be used to rank<br />

individuals by exposure to selected chemicals. Although FFQs are not<br />

designed to measure absolute exposure, the method may be more accurate<br />

than other methods for estimating average exposure to chemicals having<br />

large day-to-day variability and for which there are relatively few<br />

food sources. FFQs have several disadvantages too: specifically, they<br />

are less reliable in estimating consumption of rarely consumed foods<br />

and the food lists are often designed to assess nutrients and may<br />

require substantial revision to assess chemical exposures.<br />

7.4.3.4 Meal-based diet history<br />

Meal-based diet history methods are designed to assess usual<br />

individual food consumption. It consists of a detailed listing of the<br />

types of foods and beverages commonly consumed at each meal over a<br />

defined time period which is often a "typical week".<br />

7.4.3.5 Food habit questionnaires<br />

Food habit questionnaires are designed to collect either general<br />

or specific types of information, such as food perception and belief,<br />

food likes and dislikes, methods of preparing foods, use of dietary<br />

supplements and social setting surrounding eating occasions. This type<br />

of information is frequently considered with other methods but may be<br />

used on its own.<br />

Although the last two methods are seldom used in dietary exposure<br />

assessments they can contribute very useful background information and<br />

may be the only information for specific population group issues<br />

(e.g., organic food consumption by vegetarians). They can be targeted<br />

to answer specific questions or prioritize issues of concern and<br />

provide a cost-effective tool for the risk assessor.<br />

Page 135 of 284<br />

Table 28. An example of food listing and frequency response options of an F<br />

For each food listed, fill in the Average use of the last 3 months<br />

circle indicating how often, on<br />

average, you have used the amount Per month Per wee<br />

specified, during the past 3 months<br />

Never or 1-3 1 2-4<br />

less than<br />

once<br />

DAIRY FOODS Skim or low-fat milk<br />

(8 oz glass) 0 0 0 0<br />

Whole milk (8 oz glass) 0 0 0 0<br />

Sherbet or ice milk<br />

(1/2 cup) 0 0 0 0<br />

Ice cream (1/2 cup) 0 0 0 0<br />

http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />

6/1/2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!