12.02.2013 Views

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />

basket survey based on heavy metal and pesticide data measured in<br />

samples of 234 different ready-to-eat food products selected to be<br />

representative of over 4000 foods common in the diet of residents in<br />

the USA, and the results of national food consumption surveys<br />

(Pennington, 1992). However, more commonly total diet (market basket)<br />

studies consider smaller food groups rather than individual foods (UK<br />

MAFF, 1985). The main advantage of the total diet (market basket)<br />

approach for estimating exposure is the ability to monitor trends<br />

without burdening study participants. The total diet approach allows<br />

data from separate studies of food consumption and contaminant<br />

residues to be combined (e.g., Tomerlin et al., 1996). Moreover, this<br />

approach allows analytical chemistry resources to be directed to the<br />

foods that are most likely to yield the greatest exposure (e.g., the<br />

foods consumed in greatest amounts and foods that are likely to<br />

contain the highest residue concentrations). Such foods may be<br />

indicated by information available from existing data such as the<br />

GEMS/Food (WHO, 1978, 1997c) and the US TDS (Pennington & Gunderson,<br />

1987).<br />

However, this method cannot be used for all contaminants. This is<br />

because the analysis of food groups may be too expensive for some<br />

contaminants and may not be feasible for others. Analytical methods<br />

may not be sufficiently reliable, the limit of detection may be too<br />

high or the grouping of the foods (compositing) may decrease the<br />

likelihood of finding the source of the contaminant. Analysis of<br />

individual food products affords a detailed examination of contaminant<br />

levels in specific commodities -- either raw, processed or prepared.<br />

Sampling may be designed to characterize geographic and temporal<br />

variability of contaminant levels that may be a result of varying<br />

application rates of pesticides, natural levels of elements (e.g.,<br />

heavy metals), climate and other factors. In addition, samples can be<br />

collected at all steps in the process from field to consumer thereby<br />

providing insight into the sources and fate of contaminants in food.<br />

Further information on the strengthens and limitations of each of<br />

the approaches described above have been published in the<br />

comprehensive Guidelines for the Study of Dietary Intake of<br />

Chemical Contaminants (WHO, 1985a).<br />

7.4.3 Food consumption<br />

The FAO/WHO Consultation on Food Consumption and Exposure<br />

Assessment of Chemicals (called Exposure Consultation) reviewed<br />

current methodology for food additives, contaminants, pesticides,<br />

veterinary drugs and nutrients. The Exposure Consultation agreed to<br />

expand and revise the regional diets presently used by the GEMS/Food<br />

for pesticides and recommended that this consumption data can be used<br />

for estimate dietary exposure to certain other chemicals. The regional<br />

diets will be based on 1990-1994 FAO Food Balance Sheets which reflect<br />

a country's amount of raw commodities for consumption, and may not<br />

necessarily refer to foods in the forms people consume them. Waste at<br />

the household or individual level is not usually considered.<br />

Major methods for determining food consumption at the national<br />

levels were identified as population-based, household-based and<br />

individual-based. The report from a FAO/WHO consultation on the<br />

preparation and use of food-based guidelines (FAO/WHO, 1996) gives<br />

more information on food consumption study designs. The Exposure<br />

Consultation supported the concept that an improvement in dietary<br />

http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />

Page 133 of 284<br />

6/1/2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!