12.02.2013 Views

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />

ready-to-eat foods is the most useful measure for purposes of<br />

dietary exposure assessment.<br />

7.4.1 Duplicate diet surveys<br />

Duplicate diet surveys are particularly useful because they<br />

reflect the range of preparation habits of the study population. These<br />

studies require that respondents save a serving of each meal or<br />

components of each meal and store them until collection by the<br />

research team. Following collection, the food is composited over<br />

predetermined time intervals (e.g., by meal or by day) and analysed<br />

for the target analytes. In duplicate diet studies, logistic and cost<br />

constraints typically require that foods be composited. The principal<br />

disadvantage of composite samples is that they do not allow for<br />

identification of the contribution of individual foods to total<br />

dietary exposure. A high degree of respondent burden is associated<br />

with duplicate diet studies, so they are not conducive to assessing<br />

chronic dietary exposures and may underestimate intake. Such<br />

approaches are only suitable for chemicals that can be analysed<br />

accurately, so direct diet methods are not traditionally used for<br />

assessing food additives exposure, for example. A summary of dietary<br />

exposure assessments for chemical contaminants in food using the<br />

duplicate diet performed worldwide may be found in Thomas et al.<br />

(1997).<br />

There are many indirect methods for estimating exposure to food<br />

chemicals because there are a variety of ways to collect consumption<br />

data, to express residue levels in the foods concerned (for example,<br />

legislative levels, manufacturer or industry use levels, predicted,<br />

proposed or analysed levels or any combination of these) and there are<br />

several approaches which can be used to combine the information to<br />

assess exposure (Rees & Tennant, 1994). Some methods are better than<br />

others, depending on the chemical; for example several countries have<br />

found it useful to assess food additive exposure by using per<br />

capita methods (Ito, 1993). More information on these indirect<br />

methods is given below, but the reader is strongly advised to refer to<br />

more comprehensive documents on dietary survey methodology and dietary<br />

exposure assessment approaches (WHO, 1985a, 1997c; FAO/WHO, 1995a,b,<br />

1996, 1997).<br />

7.4.2 Market basket or total diet surveys<br />

Market basket or total diet surveys utilize food chemical<br />

concentrations measured in ready-to-eat foods prepared in the<br />

laboratory linked to model diets derived from food consumption data<br />

and standard recipe preparation for large populations, households or<br />

individuals. Food products or food groups selected for sampling and<br />

analysis are generally intended to be representative of those most<br />

commonly consumed by the population of interest. Total diet studies<br />

have been carried out since the 1960s in many countries. Market basket<br />

surveys are often employed by regulatory agencies charged with<br />

ensuring and monitoring the safety of a national food supply (FAO/WHO,<br />

1995b). Initially this purpose was to estimate background exposures of<br />

the population to pesticides residues and radioactive contaminants.<br />

The emphasis has shifted from pesticides to toxic metals and more<br />

recently has included a variety of trace elements and organic<br />

contaminants.<br />

For example, the US FDA Total Diet Study (US TDS) is a market<br />

http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />

Page 132 of 284<br />

6/1/2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!