12.02.2013 Views

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

Environmental Health Criteria 214

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />

7.1 Introduction<br />

This chapter describes sampling methods used in environmental<br />

exposure assessment to analyse chemical concentrations in air, water<br />

and food. The information presented provides a general description of<br />

available sampling methods and guidance for their selection. It is not<br />

intended to be comprehensive and the reader should refer to the<br />

research literature for specific details.<br />

Assessment of human exposures to contaminants in environmental<br />

media requires establishing measurement strategies and selecting<br />

appropriate sampling instruments and analytical methods. Taken<br />

together, these three elements define a monitoring programme.<br />

Monitoring methods can be used to determine the magnitude, duration<br />

and frequency of exposure to an environmental contaminant. Magnitude<br />

of exposure is defined as the concentration of a specific pollutant<br />

averaged over a predetermined time interval, such as 1 h, 24 h or a<br />

lifetime. Different measurement methods have specific characteristics<br />

that determine the locations in which they are feasible for use. In<br />

the case of air, the method's sensitivity to pollutants determines the<br />

averaging times over which it will provide reliable responses.<br />

Therefore, a clear understanding of the concentration range<br />

anticipated, averaging time of interest, and expected frequency of<br />

exposure events is needed to identify appropriate field and laboratory<br />

methods. In the absence of any prior information, pilot studies may be<br />

performed to obtain the information needed to finalize the design of<br />

the monitoring programme.<br />

Selection of instruments will depend on the target population<br />

(e.g., children or adults) and study objectives. In some situations,<br />

understanding the distribution or the average population exposure to a<br />

contaminant may be sufficient. In fact, most environmental monitoring<br />

of contaminants in outdoor air, water at the point of distribution and<br />

"market basket" surveys implicitly assumes that indicators of<br />

population exposure are more relevant than information at the<br />

individual level. Studies assessing individual exposures using such<br />

surrogate measures should select sampling instruments and analysis<br />

methods based on sensitivity, selectivity, response rate, portability,<br />

durability and cost, among other factors. Table 20 summarizes these<br />

concepts.<br />

7.2 Air monitoring<br />

Air sampling methodologies should conform to the exposure<br />

assessment approach selected, either direct or indirect, as described<br />

in Chapter 3.<br />

Direct monitoring methods for exposure measurements include the<br />

use of personal air monitors and/or analysis of human tissue and/or<br />

biological fluids. Aspects of biomonitoring are described in<br />

Chapter 10. Indirect air monitoring methods can include<br />

Table 20. Selection factors for instruments and methods<br />

Factor Comment<br />

Page 111 of 284<br />

Sensitivity The magnitude and duration of contaminant exposure define th<br />

http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />

6/1/2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!