Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Environmental Health Criteria 214
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT<br />
7.1 Introduction<br />
This chapter describes sampling methods used in environmental<br />
exposure assessment to analyse chemical concentrations in air, water<br />
and food. The information presented provides a general description of<br />
available sampling methods and guidance for their selection. It is not<br />
intended to be comprehensive and the reader should refer to the<br />
research literature for specific details.<br />
Assessment of human exposures to contaminants in environmental<br />
media requires establishing measurement strategies and selecting<br />
appropriate sampling instruments and analytical methods. Taken<br />
together, these three elements define a monitoring programme.<br />
Monitoring methods can be used to determine the magnitude, duration<br />
and frequency of exposure to an environmental contaminant. Magnitude<br />
of exposure is defined as the concentration of a specific pollutant<br />
averaged over a predetermined time interval, such as 1 h, 24 h or a<br />
lifetime. Different measurement methods have specific characteristics<br />
that determine the locations in which they are feasible for use. In<br />
the case of air, the method's sensitivity to pollutants determines the<br />
averaging times over which it will provide reliable responses.<br />
Therefore, a clear understanding of the concentration range<br />
anticipated, averaging time of interest, and expected frequency of<br />
exposure events is needed to identify appropriate field and laboratory<br />
methods. In the absence of any prior information, pilot studies may be<br />
performed to obtain the information needed to finalize the design of<br />
the monitoring programme.<br />
Selection of instruments will depend on the target population<br />
(e.g., children or adults) and study objectives. In some situations,<br />
understanding the distribution or the average population exposure to a<br />
contaminant may be sufficient. In fact, most environmental monitoring<br />
of contaminants in outdoor air, water at the point of distribution and<br />
"market basket" surveys implicitly assumes that indicators of<br />
population exposure are more relevant than information at the<br />
individual level. Studies assessing individual exposures using such<br />
surrogate measures should select sampling instruments and analysis<br />
methods based on sensitivity, selectivity, response rate, portability,<br />
durability and cost, among other factors. Table 20 summarizes these<br />
concepts.<br />
7.2 Air monitoring<br />
Air sampling methodologies should conform to the exposure<br />
assessment approach selected, either direct or indirect, as described<br />
in Chapter 3.<br />
Direct monitoring methods for exposure measurements include the<br />
use of personal air monitors and/or analysis of human tissue and/or<br />
biological fluids. Aspects of biomonitoring are described in<br />
Chapter 10. Indirect air monitoring methods can include<br />
Table 20. Selection factors for instruments and methods<br />
Factor Comment<br />
Page 111 of 284<br />
Sensitivity The magnitude and duration of contaminant exposure define th<br />
http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc<strong>214</strong>.htm<br />
6/1/2007