OUSEION - Memorial University of Newfoundland DAI

OUSEION - Memorial University of Newfoundland DAI OUSEION - Memorial University of Newfoundland DAI

collections.mun.ca
from collections.mun.ca More from this publisher
12.02.2013 Views

ARISTOXENOS AND PERIPA TETIC BIOGRAPHY 313 which is shaped by and revealed in his actions. 27 The consistency with which Plutarch uses Peripatetic terms to describe his biographical method and aims has led some scholars to conclude that Plutarch was following a formalized Peripatetic theory of biography.28 Scholars are no longer prepared to go that far. nor. in fact. are all bioi that have come down to us so ethically oriented. This point can be easily illustrated by comparing Plutarch's Demosthenes with the life of Demosthenes in the Moralia (844b-848d). where one finds a complete absence of ethical concerns. Nor for that matter is the study of character the exclusive preserve of bioi. On Plutarch's own admission. Thucydides and Philistos wrote narratives that revealed character. Theopompos. according to ancient critics like Dionysios of Halicarnassos (Pomp. 6.7). had the ability to detect the motives of actors in history and reveal their apparent virtue and undetected vice. 29 Motives most commonly attributed to his characters are akrasia and philotimia. 30 and philotimia is a character trait that Plutarch attributes to many heroes and illustrates in the narratives of their lives. 31 But as far as we can tell. the ancients never regarded the Philippika. which was a history centered on an individual and whose very title might suggest biography. as anything but historyY Perhaps it can be argued that Theopompos played an important role in the development of biography. but that is a separate issue; what Theapompos was up to was not biography as far as the ancients were concerned. So subject matter alone is not enough to distinguish bioi from history. Where the writer of bioi and the writer of historia parted company were in the "larger elements of historical composition-speeches. battles. geographical excursuses."33 Scale or size was the difference: where historia described large battles. bioi included small events or' abbreviated the account. where historia included speeches. bioi sayings. 34 where historia provided chronological development. bioi were 27 Leo (1901) 188: Hamilton (1999) xliv: Russell (1966) 144. (1995) 81-82. (1973) 105-106. 28 Dihle (1956) 63: d. Scardigli (1995) 10. 29 For a discussion of this famous evaluation see Shrimpton (1991) 21. and Flower (1997) 170. 30 Flower (1997) 170-174: Shrirnpton (1991) 136-151. 3 1 Wardrnan (1974) 115-12.4: Russell (1973) 106. 3 2 Flower (1997) 149· 33 Russell (1966) 148. (1995) 87. 34 On small events and sayings as the biographer's counterpart to battles and speeches see Wardrnan (1971) 254-256.

ARISTOXENOS AND PERIPA TETIC BIOGRAPHY 313<br />

which is shaped by and revealed in his actions. 27 The consistency with<br />

which Plutarch uses Peripatetic terms to describe his biographical<br />

method and aims has led some scholars to conclude that Plutarch was<br />

following a formalized Peripatetic theory <strong>of</strong> biography.28 Scholars are<br />

no longer prepared to go that far. nor. in fact. are all bioi that have<br />

come down to us so ethically oriented. This point can be easily illustrated<br />

by comparing Plutarch's Demosthenes with the life <strong>of</strong><br />

Demosthenes in the Moralia (844b-848d). where one finds a complete<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> ethical concerns.<br />

Nor for that matter is the study <strong>of</strong> character the exclusive preserve<br />

<strong>of</strong> bioi. On Plutarch's own admission. Thucydides and Philistos wrote<br />

narratives that revealed character. Theopompos. according to ancient<br />

critics like Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halicarnassos (Pomp. 6.7). had the ability to<br />

detect the motives <strong>of</strong> actors in history and reveal their apparent virtue<br />

and undetected vice. 29 Motives most commonly attributed to his characters<br />

are akrasia and philotimia. 30 and philotimia is a character trait<br />

that Plutarch attributes to many heroes and illustrates in the narratives<br />

<strong>of</strong> their lives. 31 But as far as we can tell. the ancients never regarded<br />

the Philippika. which was a history centered on an individual and<br />

whose very title might suggest biography. as anything but historyY<br />

Perhaps it can be argued that Theopompos played an important role in<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> biography. but that is a separate issue; what Theapompos<br />

was up to was not biography as far as the ancients were concerned.<br />

So subject matter alone is not enough to distinguish bioi from history.<br />

Where the writer <strong>of</strong> bioi and the writer <strong>of</strong> historia parted company<br />

were in the "larger elements <strong>of</strong> historical composition-speeches.<br />

battles. geographical excursuses."33 Scale or size was the difference:<br />

where historia described large battles. bioi included small events or'<br />

abbreviated the account. where historia included speeches. bioi sayings.<br />

34 where historia provided chronological development. bioi were<br />

27 Leo (1901) 188: Hamilton (1999) xliv: Russell (1966) 144. (1995) 81-82. (1973)<br />

105-106.<br />

28 Dihle (1956) 63: d. Scardigli (1995) 10.<br />

29 For a discussion <strong>of</strong> this famous evaluation see Shrimpton (1991) 21. and<br />

Flower (1997) 170.<br />

30 Flower (1997) 170-174: Shrirnpton (1991) 136-151.<br />

3 1 Wardrnan (1974) 115-12.4: Russell (1973) 106.<br />

3 2 Flower (1997) 149·<br />

33 Russell (1966) 148. (1995) 87.<br />

34 On small events and sayings as the biographer's counterpart to battles and<br />

speeches see Wardrnan (1971) 254-256.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!