OUSEION - Memorial University of Newfoundland DAI
OUSEION - Memorial University of Newfoundland DAI OUSEION - Memorial University of Newfoundland DAI
ARISTOXENOS AND PERIPA TETIC BIOGRAPHY 313 which is shaped by and revealed in his actions. 27 The consistency with which Plutarch uses Peripatetic terms to describe his biographical method and aims has led some scholars to conclude that Plutarch was following a formalized Peripatetic theory of biography.28 Scholars are no longer prepared to go that far. nor. in fact. are all bioi that have come down to us so ethically oriented. This point can be easily illustrated by comparing Plutarch's Demosthenes with the life of Demosthenes in the Moralia (844b-848d). where one finds a complete absence of ethical concerns. Nor for that matter is the study of character the exclusive preserve of bioi. On Plutarch's own admission. Thucydides and Philistos wrote narratives that revealed character. Theopompos. according to ancient critics like Dionysios of Halicarnassos (Pomp. 6.7). had the ability to detect the motives of actors in history and reveal their apparent virtue and undetected vice. 29 Motives most commonly attributed to his characters are akrasia and philotimia. 30 and philotimia is a character trait that Plutarch attributes to many heroes and illustrates in the narratives of their lives. 31 But as far as we can tell. the ancients never regarded the Philippika. which was a history centered on an individual and whose very title might suggest biography. as anything but historyY Perhaps it can be argued that Theopompos played an important role in the development of biography. but that is a separate issue; what Theapompos was up to was not biography as far as the ancients were concerned. So subject matter alone is not enough to distinguish bioi from history. Where the writer of bioi and the writer of historia parted company were in the "larger elements of historical composition-speeches. battles. geographical excursuses."33 Scale or size was the difference: where historia described large battles. bioi included small events or' abbreviated the account. where historia included speeches. bioi sayings. 34 where historia provided chronological development. bioi were 27 Leo (1901) 188: Hamilton (1999) xliv: Russell (1966) 144. (1995) 81-82. (1973) 105-106. 28 Dihle (1956) 63: d. Scardigli (1995) 10. 29 For a discussion of this famous evaluation see Shrimpton (1991) 21. and Flower (1997) 170. 30 Flower (1997) 170-174: Shrirnpton (1991) 136-151. 3 1 Wardrnan (1974) 115-12.4: Russell (1973) 106. 3 2 Flower (1997) 149· 33 Russell (1966) 148. (1995) 87. 34 On small events and sayings as the biographer's counterpart to battles and speeches see Wardrnan (1971) 254-256.
- Page 3 and 4: MOUSE/ON Journal of the Classical A
- Page 6: AVIS AUX AUTEURS I. Les references
- Page 16 and 17: 306 DAVIDSHNE Presumably. aTTlC aTE
- Page 18 and 19: 308 CRAIG COOPER of ancient histori
- Page 20 and 21: 310 CRAIG COOPER BIOI AS GENRE That
- Page 24 and 25: 3 14 CRAIG COOPER less concerned wi
- Page 26: 316 CRAIG COOPER terial included in
- Page 31: ARISTOXENOS AND PERIPA TETIC BIOGRA
- Page 46 and 47: 336 CRAIG COOPER stability that com
- Page 49: ARiSTOXENOS AND PERIPATETIC BIOGRAP
- Page 52 and 53: 342 H. ROISMAN the film emphasizes
- Page 54 and 55: 344 H.ROISMAN suing the fight are n
- Page 56 and 57: 346 H.ROISMAN argumentation. Alice'
- Page 58 and 59: H.ROISMAN ready to give up everythi
- Page 60 and 61: 35° H.ROISMAN importance of the ra
- Page 64 and 65: 354 H.ROISMAN agreed to meet with h
- Page 69 and 70: FEMALE INDIGNAnON 359 the man befor
ARISTOXENOS AND PERIPA TETIC BIOGRAPHY 313<br />
which is shaped by and revealed in his actions. 27 The consistency with<br />
which Plutarch uses Peripatetic terms to describe his biographical<br />
method and aims has led some scholars to conclude that Plutarch was<br />
following a formalized Peripatetic theory <strong>of</strong> biography.28 Scholars are<br />
no longer prepared to go that far. nor. in fact. are all bioi that have<br />
come down to us so ethically oriented. This point can be easily illustrated<br />
by comparing Plutarch's Demosthenes with the life <strong>of</strong><br />
Demosthenes in the Moralia (844b-848d). where one finds a complete<br />
absence <strong>of</strong> ethical concerns.<br />
Nor for that matter is the study <strong>of</strong> character the exclusive preserve<br />
<strong>of</strong> bioi. On Plutarch's own admission. Thucydides and Philistos wrote<br />
narratives that revealed character. Theopompos. according to ancient<br />
critics like Dionysios <strong>of</strong> Halicarnassos (Pomp. 6.7). had the ability to<br />
detect the motives <strong>of</strong> actors in history and reveal their apparent virtue<br />
and undetected vice. 29 Motives most commonly attributed to his characters<br />
are akrasia and philotimia. 30 and philotimia is a character trait<br />
that Plutarch attributes to many heroes and illustrates in the narratives<br />
<strong>of</strong> their lives. 31 But as far as we can tell. the ancients never regarded<br />
the Philippika. which was a history centered on an individual and<br />
whose very title might suggest biography. as anything but historyY<br />
Perhaps it can be argued that Theopompos played an important role in<br />
the development <strong>of</strong> biography. but that is a separate issue; what Theapompos<br />
was up to was not biography as far as the ancients were concerned.<br />
So subject matter alone is not enough to distinguish bioi from history.<br />
Where the writer <strong>of</strong> bioi and the writer <strong>of</strong> historia parted company<br />
were in the "larger elements <strong>of</strong> historical composition-speeches.<br />
battles. geographical excursuses."33 Scale or size was the difference:<br />
where historia described large battles. bioi included small events or'<br />
abbreviated the account. where historia included speeches. bioi sayings.<br />
34 where historia provided chronological development. bioi were<br />
27 Leo (1901) 188: Hamilton (1999) xliv: Russell (1966) 144. (1995) 81-82. (1973)<br />
105-106.<br />
28 Dihle (1956) 63: d. Scardigli (1995) 10.<br />
29 For a discussion <strong>of</strong> this famous evaluation see Shrimpton (1991) 21. and<br />
Flower (1997) 170.<br />
30 Flower (1997) 170-174: Shrirnpton (1991) 136-151.<br />
3 1 Wardrnan (1974) 115-12.4: Russell (1973) 106.<br />
3 2 Flower (1997) 149·<br />
33 Russell (1966) 148. (1995) 87.<br />
34 On small events and sayings as the biographer's counterpart to battles and<br />
speeches see Wardrnan (1971) 254-256.