12.02.2013 Views

E-FILED - SC Superior Court E-Filing

E-FILED - SC Superior Court E-Filing

E-FILED - SC Superior Court E-Filing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

E-<strong>FILED</strong>: Oct 15, 2012 5:00 PM, <strong>Superior</strong> <strong>Court</strong> of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-08-CV-129264 <strong>Filing</strong> #G-47834<br />

*<br />

BRUCE L. McFARLANE<br />

CONSULTING AND TESTIMONY CASE LISTING<br />

Testimony<br />

Lawsuit Type Dep T Dec <strong>Court</strong> Law Firm Work Performed<br />

222 The Profit Recovery Group v. P<br />

Loder, et al.<br />

223 Thomas & Betts Corporation<br />

v. Panduit Corp.<br />

P<br />

224 Yield Dynamics, Inc. v.<br />

Cypress Semiconductor<br />

Corporation<br />

P<br />

225 Yield Dynamics, Inc. v.<br />

Lumileds Lighting U.S., LLC.<br />

P<br />

Theft of trade<br />

secrets<br />

Theft of trade<br />

secrets<br />

Theft of trade<br />

secrets<br />

Theft of trade<br />

secrets<br />

Trademark<br />

infringement<br />

US District <strong>Court</strong>;<br />

Central District of<br />

California, Western<br />

Division; Civil Action<br />

No. CV 01-6200<br />

GHK (2001)<br />

U.S. District <strong>Court</strong>,<br />

Northern District of<br />

Illinois, Eastern<br />

Division (1997)<br />

American Arbitration<br />

Association (2006);<br />

Case No. 74 133<br />

00508 06 0MTH<br />

<strong>Superior</strong> <strong>Court</strong> for<br />

the State of<br />

California, Santa<br />

Clara County. Case<br />

No. 1-05-CV-037009<br />

226 Affinity Network, Inc. v. AT&T D<br />

U.S. District <strong>Court</strong>,<br />

227 Pacific Electricord Company<br />

v. Paige Manufacturing Corp.<br />

D<br />

228 SalesMark, Inc. v. American<br />

Management Group, Inc.<br />

D<br />

229 Snelling and Snelling, Inc. v.<br />

MacLeod Investments, Inc.,<br />

et al.<br />

D<br />

230 Altitude Capital Partners -<br />

TPL Group Due Diligence<br />

na<br />

231 Eastman Kodak Company v.<br />

St. Clair Intellectual Property<br />

Consultants, Inc., et al.<br />

D<br />

232 e-Cards v. Larry Joe King, et<br />

al.<br />

P<br />

Trademark<br />

infringement<br />

Trademark<br />

infringement<br />

Trademark<br />

infringement<br />

Transaction<br />

Unfair<br />

competition<br />

Unfair<br />

competition<br />

(Lahnam Act)<br />

Central District of<br />

California (1994)<br />

California <strong>Superior</strong><br />

<strong>Court</strong>, Los Angeles<br />

County; Case No.<br />

BC157514 (1998)<br />

U. S. District <strong>Court</strong>,<br />

Northern District of<br />

California; Civil<br />

Action No. C-98-<br />

0177 (1998)<br />

U. S. District <strong>Court</strong>,<br />

Northern District of<br />

California; Civil<br />

Action No. C-97<br />

20156 (1997)<br />

Knobbe, Martens,<br />

Olson & Bear/Vito<br />

Canuso, John<br />

Holcomb, Linda Zadra-<br />

Symes<br />

McBride, Baker &<br />

Coles/Robert<br />

Queeney, George<br />

Sanders<br />

Russo & Hale / Jack<br />

Russo, John Kelley,<br />

Chris Sargent<br />

Russo & Hale /<br />

Michael Risch<br />

Jeffer, Mangels,<br />

Butler &<br />

Marmaro/Stan Gibson<br />

Werner & Burke/Joe<br />

Burke<br />

Thelen, Reid &<br />

Priest/Robert Weikert<br />

Margolis &<br />

Morin/Michael Morin<br />

Analysis to determine<br />

whether defendants<br />

practiced plaintiff's claimed<br />

trade secrets and whether<br />

claimed trade secrets<br />

possessed independent<br />

economic value.<br />

Determine damages due to<br />

defendant's theft of trade<br />

secrets (customer data).<br />

Analysis of YDI's damages<br />

due to Cypress<br />

Semiconductor's alleged<br />

unlicensed use of YDI's<br />

yield enhancement software.<br />

Determine damages due to<br />

Lumileds' theft of trade<br />

secrets relating to yield<br />

enhancement software.<br />

Damages analysis.<br />

Calculate defendant's<br />

damages in cross-complaint<br />

against plaintiff for<br />

trademark infringement.<br />

Analysis of reasonable<br />

royalty, lost profits and<br />

unjust enrichment damages.<br />

Calculate plaintiff's<br />

damages resulting from<br />

defendant's trademark<br />

infringement.<br />

n/a n/a Provide economic due<br />

diligence analysis in<br />

connection with IP<br />

investment opportunity.<br />

<strong>Superior</strong> <strong>Court</strong> of<br />

California, Santa<br />

Clara County; Case<br />

No.: 1-05-CV-039164<br />

U. S. District <strong>Court</strong>,<br />

Northern District of<br />

California (2000)<br />

Page 24 of 26<br />

Robins, Kaplan, Miller<br />

& Ciresi / Ron Shutz,<br />

Becky Thorson, Carrie<br />

Lambert<br />

Williams &<br />

Connolly/Paul Gaffney<br />

Analysis of plaintiff's<br />

damages analysis regarding<br />

St. Clair's alleged unfair<br />

competition with respect to<br />

intellectual property<br />

(patents) regarding digital<br />

camera technology.<br />

Valuation of internet site ecards.com.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!