E-FILED - SC Superior Court E-Filing
E-FILED - SC Superior Court E-Filing
E-FILED - SC Superior Court E-Filing
- TAGS
- www.scefiling.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
E-<strong>FILED</strong>: Oct 15, 2012 5:00 PM, <strong>Superior</strong> <strong>Court</strong> of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-08-CV-129264 <strong>Filing</strong> #G-47834<br />
*<br />
BRUCE L. McFARLANE<br />
CONSULTING AND TESTIMONY CASE LISTING<br />
Testimony<br />
Lawsuit Type Dep T Dec <strong>Court</strong> Law Firm Work Performed<br />
147 Convolve, Inc. v. Dell, Inc., et P<br />
al.<br />
148 Cryptography Research, Inc.<br />
v. VISA International Service<br />
Association<br />
D<br />
149 Cylink Corporation v. RSA<br />
Data Security, Inc.<br />
D<br />
Patent<br />
infringement<br />
Patent<br />
Infringement<br />
Patent<br />
Infringement<br />
U.S. District <strong>Court</strong>,<br />
Eastern District of<br />
Texas, Marshall<br />
Division; Civil Action<br />
No. 2:08-cv-244<br />
U.S. District <strong>Court</strong>,<br />
Northern District of<br />
California (San Jose<br />
Division); Case No.<br />
05:C-04-4143 JW<br />
U.S. District <strong>Court</strong>,<br />
Northern District of<br />
California (1995)<br />
150 Datascape v. Avaya P Patent<br />
n/a (prelitigation<br />
Infringement<br />
license negotiation)<br />
151 Datascape, Inc v. Sprint<br />
Nextel Corporation, et al.<br />
P<br />
152 Datascape, Inc. v. Kyocera<br />
Wireless Corp., Inc.<br />
P<br />
153 Datascape, Inc. v. Sharp<br />
Electronics<br />
P<br />
154 Datascape, Inc. v. Sony<br />
Ericsson Mobile<br />
Communications, Inc.<br />
P<br />
155 Datascape, Inc. v.<br />
UTStarcom, Inc.<br />
P<br />
Patent<br />
Infringement<br />
Patent<br />
Infringement<br />
Patent<br />
Infringement<br />
Patent<br />
Infringement<br />
Patent<br />
Infringement<br />
U.S. District <strong>Court</strong>,<br />
Northern District of<br />
Georgia, Atlanta<br />
Division / Civil Action<br />
File No. 1:07-CV-<br />
0640-CC<br />
U.S. District <strong>Court</strong>,<br />
Northern District of<br />
Georgia. Civil Action<br />
No. 1:05-CV-1651-CC<br />
n/a (prelitigation<br />
license negotiation)<br />
U.S. District <strong>Court</strong>,<br />
Northern District of<br />
Georgia. Case No.<br />
1:05-CV-3317-CC<br />
U.S. District <strong>Court</strong>,<br />
Northern District of<br />
Georgia. Case No.<br />
1:05-CV-3164-CC<br />
Page 16 of 26<br />
Robins Kaplan Miller<br />
& Ciresi / Jim<br />
Anderson, Anna Carr<br />
Mayer Brown /<br />
Brandon Baum<br />
Tomlinson, Zisko,<br />
Morosoli & Maser/Jim<br />
Busselle, Tom Moore<br />
Robins Kaplan Miller<br />
& Ciresi / Steve<br />
Risley, Scott<br />
Culpepper<br />
Robins Kaplan Miller<br />
& Ciresi / Jim<br />
Anderson, Heidi<br />
Raschke<br />
Robins Kaplan Miller<br />
& Ciresi / Steve<br />
Risley, Scott<br />
Culpepper<br />
Robins Kaplan Miller<br />
& Ciresi / Jim<br />
Anderson<br />
Robins Kaplan Miller<br />
& Ciresi / Steve<br />
Risley, Scott<br />
Culpepper<br />
Robins Kaplan Miller<br />
& Ciresi / Steve<br />
Risley, Scott<br />
Culpepper<br />
Analysis of reasonable<br />
royalty damages due to<br />
defendants' alleged<br />
infringment of Convolve's<br />
patented technology<br />
regarding accoustic<br />
management in hard disk<br />
drives.<br />
Determine reasonable<br />
royalty damages due to<br />
VISA's alleged infringement<br />
of patented technology<br />
regarding smart card<br />
security features.<br />
Calculate reasonable royalty<br />
damages regarding data<br />
encryption technology.<br />
Analysis of reasonable<br />
royalty damages due to<br />
Avaya's' alleged infringment<br />
of Datascape's patented<br />
technology regarding WAP<br />
enabled cell phones.<br />
Analysis of reasonable<br />
royalty damages due to<br />
Sprint's alleged infringment<br />
of Datascape's patented<br />
technology regarding WAP<br />
enabled cell phones.<br />
Determine reasonable<br />
royalty damages due to<br />
Kyocera's infringement of<br />
portfolio of patents related<br />
to WAP enabled cellular<br />
telephones.<br />
Analysis of reasonable<br />
royalty damages due to<br />
Sharp's alleged infringment<br />
of Datascape's patented<br />
technology regarding WAP<br />
enabled cell phones.<br />
Determine reasonable<br />
royalty damages due to<br />
Sony Ericsson's<br />
infringement of portfolio of<br />
patents related to WAP<br />
enabled cellular telephones.<br />
Determine reasonable<br />
royalty damages due to<br />
UTStarcom's infringement<br />
of portfolio of patents<br />
related to WAP enabled<br />
cellular telephones.