Tungíase: doença negligenciada causando patologia grave

Tungíase: doença negligenciada causando patologia grave Tungíase: doença negligenciada causando patologia grave

repositorio.ufc.br
from repositorio.ufc.br More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

Tropical Medicine and International Health doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02545.x volume 15 no 7 pp 856–864 july 2010 A simple method for rapid community assessment of tungiasis L. Ariza 1 , T. Wilcke 2 , A. Jackson 2 , M. Gomide 3 , U. S. Ugbomoiko 4 , H. Feldmeier 2 and J. Heukelbach 5,6 1 Post-Graduation Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil 2 Charité University of Medicine, Institute of Microbiology and Hygiene, Berlin, Germany 3 Institute of Collective Health, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 4 Department of Zoology, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria 5 Department of Community Health, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil 6 Anton Breinl Centre for Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia Summary objective To evaluate a rapid assessment method to estimate the overall prevalence of tungiasis and severity of disease in endemic communities. methods We analysed data from 10 population-based surveys on tungiasis, performed in five endemic communities in Brazil and Nigeria between 2001 and 2008. To assess the association between occurrence of tungiasis on six defined topographic areas of the feet and the true prevalence ⁄ prevalence of severe disease, linear regression analyses were performed. Estimated prevalences were calculated for each of the 10 surveys and compared to true prevalences. We then selected the most useful topographic localization to define a rapid assessment method, based on the strength of association and operational aspects. results In total, 7121 individuals of the five communities were examined. Prevalence of tungiasis varied between 21.1% and 54.4%. The presence of periungual lesions on the toes was identified as the most useful rapid assessment to estimate the prevalence of tungiasis (absolute errors: )4% to +3.6%; R 2 = 96%; P < 0.0001). Prevalence of severe tungiasis (>20 lesions) was also estimated by the method (absolute errors: )3.1% to +2.5%; R 2 = 76%; P = 0.001). conclusion Prevalence of tungiasis and prevalence of severe disease can be reliably estimated in communities with distinct cultural and geographical characteristics, by applying a simple and rapid epidemiological method. This approach will help to detect high-risk communities and to monitor control measures aimed at the reduction of tungiasis. Introduction keywords tungiasis, Tunga penetrans, Rapid Assessment Method, Brazil, Africa Tungiasis is a tropical parasitic skin disease caused by penetration of the jigger flea Tunga penetrans (Linnaeus 1758) into the skin of human or animal hosts (Heukelbach 2005). Hundreds of parasites may accumulate in heavily infested individuals (Feldmeier et al. 2003; Joseph et al. 2006; Ugbomoiko et al. 2007). The disease is a self-limited infestation (Eisele et al. 2003; Feldmeier & Heukelbach 2009), but complications such as bacterial super-infection and debilitating sequels are often seen in endemic areas (Bezerra 1994; Heukelbach et al. 2001; Feldmeier et al. 2002, 2003; Joseph et al. 2006; Ariza et al. 2007; Ugbomoiko et al. 2008). Septicaemia and tetanus are life-threatening complications of tungiasis (Tonge 1989; Litvoc et al. 1991; Greco et al. 2001; Feldmeier et al. 2002; Joseph et al. 2006). Typically, the disease occurs in poor communities in Latin America, the Caribbean and sub–Saharan Africa (Heukelbach et al. 2001; Heukelbach 2005). In recent cross-sectional studies from endemic areas in Brazil, Cameroon, Madagascar, Nigeria and Trinidad & Tobago, point prevalences ranged between 16% and 54% (Chadee 1998; Njeumi et al. 2002; Wilcke et al. 2002; Carvalho et al. 2003; Muehlen et al. 2003; Joseph et al. 2006; Ugbomoiko et al. 2007; Ratovonjato et al. 2008). However, prevalence and distribution of the disease are not documented in most endemic areas. In settings where financial and human resources are scarce, policy makers need cost-effective and simple methods to estimate prevalence and severity of disease in affected populations (Anker 1991; Vlassoff & Tanner 1992; Macintyre 1999; Macintyre et al. 1999). As a consequence, rapid assessment methods have been 856 ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Tropical Medicine and International Health volume 15 no 7 pp 856–864 july 2010 L. Ariza et al. Rapid community assessment of tungiasis developed for a variety parasitic diseases and health conditions, mainly in low-income countries (Anker 1991; Vlassoff & Tanner 1992; Macintyre 1999; Macintyre et al. 1999). For example, the macroscopic presence of haematuria (Lengeler et al. 1991, 2002a,b; Red Urine Study Group 1995), the identification of palpable nodules in the skin (Ngoumou et al. 1994; Whitworth & Gemade 1999; Kipp & Bamhuhiiga 2002) and the presence of elephantiasis and hydrocele (Gyapong et al. 1996, 1998a,b; Weerasooriya et al. 2008) have been used to estimate the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis, onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis, respectively. Rapid assessment methods are commonly used to plan and monitor mass interventions, but also to detect parasitized individuals. Control of tungiasis at the community level has rarely been attempted (Heukelbach et al. 2001; Pilger et al. 2008), and rapid assessments methods are not available. Because in endemic areas 95–98% of sand flea lesions are restricted to the feet (Heukelbach et al. 2002, 2007a; Ugbomoiko et al. 2007), we assessed different topographic areas of the feet to be used as a rapid method for the presence of sand fleas. An area was identified that would give a reliable proxy to estimate prevalence of tungiasis. The occurrence of tungiasis on periungual sites of the toes was the most reliable and practical approach to estimate overall prevalence and severity of disease. Materials and methods Study areas We included data from 10 cross-sectional populationbased surveys conducted in five communities between 2001 and 2008. Three communities are located in Northeast Figure 1 Location of study areas (a) in Brazil (Ceará and Alagoas State) and (b) Nigeria (Lagos State). Brazil, two in Southwest Nigeria. The communities studied in Brazil were Balbino, a fishing village in Ceará State (Northeast Brazil); Morro do Sandras, an urban slum in the city of Fortaleza (capital of Ceará State); and Feliz Deserto, a rural community in Alagoas State. In Nigeria, data were collected in Yovoyan and Okunilaje, two small fishing villages in Lagos State (Southwest Nigeria, Figure 1). All five communities were characterized by low socioeconomic status, but showed distinct cultural and geographical characteristics. The study areas had in common that streets were not paved, and families were extremely poor (mean monthly family income equivalent to € 45.00). Illiteracy rates ranged between 15% and 30%. Whereas in Brazil, more than 90% of households had electric power supply, no access to electricity existed in the Nigerian communities. In Nigeria, the vast majority of houses were built of palm stems; and in Brazil, most houses were made of bricks or adobe. The main characteristics of the communities and their populations are depicted in Table 1. As tungiasis is known to show a particular seasonal variation (Heukelbach et al. 2005), data were collected in different periods of the year (dry and rainy season). In Nigeria, surveys were conducted during dry season only, as in the rainy season isolated communities are not accessible. In addition, according to key informants, tungiasis virtually does not occur in these communities during the heavy rain falls typical of this region in Nigeria. Detailed prevalence data on the Brazilian communities have been published previously (Wilcke et al. 2002; Muehlen et al. 2003; Heukelbach et al. 2005, 2007a). Clinical examinations were performed by investigators trained in an endemic area in Brazil and monitored by the same team leader. Field investigators were monitored Ceara Alagoas Lagos (a) (b) ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 857

Tropical Medicine and International Health volume 15 no 7 pp 856–864 july 2010<br />

L. Ariza et al. Rapid community assessment of tungiasis<br />

developed for a variety parasitic diseases and health<br />

conditions, mainly in low-income countries (Anker 1991;<br />

Vlassoff & Tanner 1992; Macintyre 1999; Macintyre et al.<br />

1999). For example, the macroscopic presence of haematuria<br />

(Lengeler et al. 1991, 2002a,b; Red Urine Study<br />

Group 1995), the identification of palpable nodules in the<br />

skin (Ngoumou et al. 1994; Whitworth & Gemade 1999;<br />

Kipp & Bamhuhiiga 2002) and the presence of elephantiasis<br />

and hydrocele (Gyapong et al. 1996, 1998a,b;<br />

Weerasooriya et al. 2008) have been used to estimate the<br />

prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis, onchocerciasis and<br />

lymphatic filariasis, respectively. Rapid assessment methods<br />

are commonly used to plan and monitor mass<br />

interventions, but also to detect parasitized individuals.<br />

Control of tungiasis at the community level has rarely been<br />

attempted (Heukelbach et al. 2001; Pilger et al. 2008), and<br />

rapid assessments methods are not available.<br />

Because in endemic areas 95–98% of sand flea lesions<br />

are restricted to the feet (Heukelbach et al. 2002, 2007a;<br />

Ugbomoiko et al. 2007), we assessed different topographic<br />

areas of the feet to be used as a rapid method for the<br />

presence of sand fleas. An area was identified that would<br />

give a reliable proxy to estimate prevalence of tungiasis.<br />

The occurrence of tungiasis on periungual sites of the toes<br />

was the most reliable and practical approach to estimate<br />

overall prevalence and severity of disease.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Study areas<br />

We included data from 10 cross-sectional populationbased<br />

surveys conducted in five communities between 2001<br />

and 2008. Three communities are located in Northeast<br />

Figure 1 Location of study areas (a) in<br />

Brazil (Ceará and Alagoas State) and (b)<br />

Nigeria (Lagos State).<br />

Brazil, two in Southwest Nigeria. The communities studied<br />

in Brazil were Balbino, a fishing village in Ceará State<br />

(Northeast Brazil); Morro do Sandras, an urban slum in<br />

the city of Fortaleza (capital of Ceará State); and Feliz<br />

Deserto, a rural community in Alagoas State. In Nigeria,<br />

data were collected in Yovoyan and Okunilaje, two small<br />

fishing villages in Lagos State (Southwest Nigeria,<br />

Figure 1).<br />

All five communities were characterized by low socioeconomic<br />

status, but showed distinct cultural and geographical<br />

characteristics. The study areas had in common<br />

that streets were not paved, and families were extremely<br />

poor (mean monthly family income equivalent to € 45.00).<br />

Illiteracy rates ranged between 15% and 30%. Whereas in<br />

Brazil, more than 90% of households had electric power<br />

supply, no access to electricity existed in the Nigerian<br />

communities. In Nigeria, the vast majority of houses were<br />

built of palm stems; and in Brazil, most houses were made<br />

of bricks or adobe. The main characteristics of the<br />

communities and their populations are depicted in Table 1.<br />

As tungiasis is known to show a particular seasonal<br />

variation (Heukelbach et al. 2005), data were collected in<br />

different periods of the year (dry and rainy season). In<br />

Nigeria, surveys were conducted during dry season only, as<br />

in the rainy season isolated communities are not accessible.<br />

In addition, according to key informants, tungiasis virtually<br />

does not occur in these communities during the heavy<br />

rain falls typical of this region in Nigeria.<br />

Detailed prevalence data on the Brazilian communities<br />

have been published previously (Wilcke et al. 2002;<br />

Muehlen et al. 2003; Heukelbach et al. 2005, 2007a).<br />

Clinical examinations were performed by investigators<br />

trained in an endemic area in Brazil and monitored by<br />

the same team leader. Field investigators were monitored<br />

Ceara<br />

Alagoas<br />

Lagos<br />

(a) (b)<br />

ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 857

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!