11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

approaches, processes <strong>of</strong> further engagement and experimentation begin, and, as explained by<br />

Lévi-Strauss, aspects <strong>of</strong> different methodological approaches are integrated, not so that<br />

“…each have <strong>of</strong> them…have only one definite and determinate use… [but rather]…They<br />

each represent a set <strong>of</strong> actual and possible relations; they are ‘operators’ but they can be used<br />

for any operations <strong>of</strong> the same type” (1966, p. 18).<br />

A potential criticism <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> bricolage in this project is that due to its conservative<br />

application, it could be argued that this methodology does not fit within or align with the<br />

research approach taken in this project. This is especially the case as, aligned with historical<br />

research methods, I do not engage in the use <strong>of</strong> metaphors, and take a more constructivist<br />

rather than critical approach to knowledge. For example, Kincheloe and McLaren do write<br />

that:<br />

Some connotations <strong>of</strong> the term (bricolage) involve trickery and cunning and remind<br />

me (Kincheloe) <strong>of</strong> the chicanery <strong>of</strong> Hermes, in particular his ambiguity concerning<br />

the messages <strong>of</strong> the gods…bricolage can also imply the fictive and imaginative<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> the presentation <strong>of</strong> all formal research. (2005, p. 316)<br />

To be clear, the use <strong>of</strong> ‘cunning’ and ‘fictive’ presentation <strong>of</strong> knowledge is not an aspect <strong>of</strong><br />

research selected for this project. Doing so would make it in opposition to and contradict the<br />

scholarship <strong>of</strong> history methodology and CDA. However, to argue against potential criticism<br />

<strong>of</strong> the conservative application <strong>of</strong> bricolage for this project, it can been seen more as a<br />

methodological approach, used in a way that remains considerate to the research paradigms<br />

<strong>of</strong> CDA (written and visual text analysis) and history methodology; and cognizant <strong>of</strong> the need<br />

to align with the approaches incorporated in the methodology <strong>of</strong> this project. In particular,<br />

Denzin and Lincoln in discussing qualitative research and bricolage as a type <strong>of</strong> multimethods<br />

research affirm:<br />

Qualitative research is inherently multi-method in focus (Flick, 2002, pp. 226-<br />

227)…The combination <strong>of</strong> multiple methodological practices, empirical materials,<br />

perspectives, and observers in a single study is best understood, then, as a strategy<br />

that adds rigor, breadth, complexity, richness, and depth to any inquiry (see Flick,<br />

2002, p. 229). (2005, p. 5)<br />

Bricolage, then, is used as a way to enrich the findings that emerge from the data by enabling<br />

a variety <strong>of</strong> methodological, theoretical and philosophical approaches to be adopted and<br />

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!