11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Three: Methodology, Research Design and Conduct<br />

3.1 Introduction: Bricolage as Methodology<br />

To form the combination <strong>of</strong> interdisciplinary methodologies and theoretical underpinnings<br />

across a variety <strong>of</strong> complementary fields into a coherent research methodology a bricolage<br />

approach has been adopted for this project. Critical discourse analysis (CDA), itself an<br />

interdisciplinary approach, is privileged as the lead methodology. For this project, the<br />

methodology incorporates visual analysis techniques; combined with an historical<br />

methodological approach and framed by Gramsci’s (1957, 1971) and Althusser’s (1971,<br />

1984) notions <strong>of</strong> hegemony, ideology and power. This enables within a rigorous approach, a<br />

“…research eclecticism, allowing circumstances to shape the methods employed…”<br />

(Kincheloe, 2004, p. 3). Bricolage methodology encompasses more than intended in the<br />

literal French translation <strong>of</strong> the word—and a common starting place for descriptions <strong>of</strong><br />

bricolage—being a Jack (or Jill)-<strong>of</strong>-all-trades using the materials at hand in construction. A<br />

bricoleur the name given to a researcher engaging in this type <strong>of</strong> research is defined by Lévi-<br />

Strauss as a “Jack <strong>of</strong> all trades or a kind <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional do-it-yourself person” (1966, p. 17).<br />

More than this, “(T)he bricoleur produces a bricolage, that is, a pieced-together, close-knit<br />

set <strong>of</strong> practices that provide solutions to a problem in a concrete situation…that changes and<br />

takes new forms as different tools, methods, and techniques are added to the puzzle” (Denzin<br />

and Lincoln, 1998, p. 3).<br />

From a foundation <strong>of</strong> CDA as the lead methodology and combining other approaches to build<br />

a rigorous, context-specific methodology this project develops CDA for specific time and<br />

content contexts. Other researchers who use CDA (see, for example, Luke, 1997) also<br />

develop it in divergent ways for the specific purposes for their research, ensuring a<br />

strengthened approach. Van Dijk presents a view <strong>of</strong> CDA that can be interpreted as<br />

supporting its incorporation into other methodologies, such as bricolage as occurs for this<br />

project, by stating CDA:<br />

…is not a method, nor a theory that simply can be applied to social problems. CDA<br />

can be conducted in, and combined with any approach and subdiscipline in the<br />

humanities and the social sciences.<br />

Rather, CDA is a – critical – perspective on doing scholarship: it is, so to<br />

speak, discourse analysis ‘with an attitude’. (2001a, p. 96)<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!