PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
emaining the same throughout. Students and teachers need to adopt flexible approaches so that in the light of information gathered, knowledge being constructed, and skills and processes being enhanced, additional or different questions and/or hypotheses can be adopted. (Naylor, 2000, p. 8) Commonly considered a proponent of progressive approaches to curriculum, Dewey focused on developing teaching practices that prepare students for a future society, rather than one that seeks to only recreate the past. Of this, which can be seen as a clear rejection of traditional approaches, Dewey writes: In static societies, societies which make the maintenance of established custom their measure of value, this conception applies in the main. But not in progressive communities. They endeavour to shape the experiences of the young so that instead of reproducing current habits, better habits shall be formed, and this the future adult society be an improvement on their own. (1916/2004, p. 79) A criticism, however, of the progressive approach is that even though it reacts against rote learning, ...this approach was not in itself able to determine which questions were worth asking. When it did, the questions were often those derived from the disciplines’ intellectual or technical concerns, rather than from their value in everyday life or from important social and environmental issues. (Gilbert, 2004, p. 11) Making reference to the epistemological emphasis of progressivist curriculum, being an inquiry process of learning and discuss it as New History, Hoepper and Quanchi write: …these new approaches encourage young people to see that histories are interpretations of the past, and that they are constructed using the available sources of evidence. Thus, histories are partial in two senses – they are incomplete (because no-one can have all the evidence, and tell the whole story) and they reflect the backgrounds and beliefs of the people who produce them (because it’s impossible to tell the objective story of the past). Students are therefore encouraged to read histories more critically – to discern perspectives, standpoints and biases. (2000, p. 5) 68
To what degree the definitions of a progressivist curriculum as included in this section are actualised in school curriculum (rather than only as a theoretical concept) is reported in Chapter 8: Conclusion. 2.8.3 Entitlement approach. Given the recent emergence of the entitlement approach, it is not anticipated that it will feature significantly (if at all) in the analysis of school curriculum for this project. The entitlement curriculum, as applied in this research, does not refer to general access to education for disadvantages or low SES students, as is sometimes the case (see, for example an analysis by Barber of the Union’s response to Thatcher’s education plans in the UK). Although Barber’s statement that an entitlement approach “...emphasizes not only skills, but also confidence, motivation and the love of learning” (Barber, 1992, p. 452) is allied with the way it is used by Gilbert. To be clear, although the entitlement approach to curriculum is not necessarily in opposition or contradiction to the following statement, its purpose in terms of its applicability to Humanities curriculum is not used in the case of this research, as described by Cox: If we do not put a positive developmental model of early childhood education in the place of the formal model we may find that we have created a generation of children among whom many have not received their entitlement to educational opportunities because what was offered was not accessible to them. (1996, p. 766) The entitlement approach, then (which is still in its early years of development), takes on a more futures perspectives, and as applicable to this research is described by Gilbert in the following way: ...an entitlement approach to social education (Gilbert, 2003), where students are given the technical mastery and the best available knowledge of concepts and values as resources for building a desirable society. Students are entitled to be provided with the concepts, processes and skills associated with contemporary institutions and practices, and required for effective participation in society. However, students are also entitled to apply and develop these learnings critically in ways which respect their cultural origins, and which enable them to construct lives according to their developing identities and commitments. (2005, p. 4) 69
- Page 32 and 33: that Bruner mentions are prepositio
- Page 34 and 35: kind of private property handed dow
- Page 36 and 37: The information presented thus far
- Page 38 and 39: English (AATE) used an editorial of
- Page 40 and 41: 2.3 Defining Textbooks One importan
- Page 42 and 43: textbooks are...a very important ve
- Page 44 and 45: which the learner is subject, but t
- Page 46 and 47: Although Issitt (2004) contends tha
- Page 48 and 49: intended set of learnings are infor
- Page 50 and 51: Moving to focus on those who hold r
- Page 52 and 53: parameters of the terms of the deba
- Page 54 and 55: Similarly, Woodfin asserts “in es
- Page 56 and 57: 1996, pp. 8-9). Luke further discus
- Page 58 and 59: powerful groups may also otherwise
- Page 60 and 61: 2.7.1 Theories of national identity
- Page 62 and 63: understood as part of a broader str
- Page 64 and 65: significance (either implicitly or
- Page 66 and 67: …in the established nations, ther
- Page 68 and 69: The ‘history wars’ in Australia
- Page 70 and 71: In academia, the move is away from
- Page 72 and 73: and its internal and external other
- Page 74 and 75: Whilst this may be an extreme examp
- Page 76 and 77: conducted for this project due to t
- Page 78 and 79: Table 2.2 The Two Traditions of His
- Page 80 and 81: puts emphasis on the celebration of
- Page 84 and 85: As one of few (current) educators i
- Page 86 and 87: A researcher bricoleur carefully se
- Page 88 and 89: approaches. What bricolage does off
- Page 90 and 91: and modification” (Reitstaetter,
- Page 92 and 93: icolage, interpretive bricolage, po
- Page 94 and 95: approaches, processes of further en
- Page 96 and 97: historical studies and more (see, f
- Page 98 and 99: A criticism made by Blommaert that
- Page 100 and 101: The lens of CDA is used to gain ins
- Page 102 and 103: with the bricolage approach adapted
- Page 104 and 105: In his examination of American hist
- Page 106 and 107: considered and, where relevant, ove
- Page 108 and 109: the…analysis of political discour
- Page 110 and 111: avoids the ‘Bad King John/Good Qu
- Page 112 and 113: 2005, p. 5). Due to placing visual
- Page 114 and 115: (1995-1996, p. 5). Increasingly, st
- Page 116 and 117: term memories, and the power nation
- Page 118 and 119: When we attempt to answer the quest
- Page 120 and 121: In academia, the move is away from
- Page 122 and 123: Historians operating in the critica
- Page 124 and 125: for the purposes of this project, i
- Page 126 and 127: get the job done to the satisfactio
- Page 128 and 129: the project, enabled through a refl
- Page 130 and 131: challenging task of the reflection
emaining the same throughout. Students and teachers need to adopt flexible<br />
approaches so that in the light <strong>of</strong> information gathered, knowledge being constructed,<br />
and skills and processes being enhanced, additional or different questions and/or<br />
hypotheses can be adopted. (Naylor, 2000, p. 8)<br />
Commonly considered a proponent <strong>of</strong> progressive approaches to curriculum, Dewey focused<br />
on developing teaching practices that prepare students for a future society, rather than one<br />
that seeks to only recreate the past. Of this, which can be seen as a clear rejection <strong>of</strong><br />
traditional approaches, Dewey writes:<br />
In static societies, societies which make the maintenance <strong>of</strong> established custom their<br />
measure <strong>of</strong> value, this conception applies in the main. But not in progressive<br />
communities. They endeavour to shape the experiences <strong>of</strong> the young so that instead<br />
<strong>of</strong> reproducing current habits, better habits shall be formed, and this the future adult<br />
society be an improvement on their own. (1916/2004, p. 79)<br />
A criticism, however, <strong>of</strong> the progressive approach is that even though it reacts against rote<br />
learning,<br />
...this approach was not in itself able to determine which questions were worth<br />
asking. When it did, the questions were <strong>of</strong>ten those derived from the disciplines’<br />
intellectual or technical concerns, rather than from their value in everyday life or<br />
from important social and environmental issues. (Gilbert, 2004, p. 11)<br />
Making reference to the epistemological emphasis <strong>of</strong> progressivist curriculum, being an<br />
inquiry process <strong>of</strong> learning and discuss it as New History, Hoepper and Quanchi write:<br />
…these new approaches encourage young people to see that histories are<br />
interpretations <strong>of</strong> the past, and that they are constructed using the available sources<br />
<strong>of</strong> evidence. Thus, histories are partial in two senses – they are incomplete (because<br />
no-one can have all the evidence, and tell the whole story) and they reflect the<br />
backgrounds and beliefs <strong>of</strong> the people who produce them (because it’s impossible to<br />
tell the objective story <strong>of</strong> the past). Students are therefore encouraged to read<br />
histories more critically – to discern perspectives, standpoints and biases. (2000, p. 5)<br />
68