PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

emaining the same throughout. Students and teachers need to adopt flexible approaches so that in the light of information gathered, knowledge being constructed, and skills and processes being enhanced, additional or different questions and/or hypotheses can be adopted. (Naylor, 2000, p. 8) Commonly considered a proponent of progressive approaches to curriculum, Dewey focused on developing teaching practices that prepare students for a future society, rather than one that seeks to only recreate the past. Of this, which can be seen as a clear rejection of traditional approaches, Dewey writes: In static societies, societies which make the maintenance of established custom their measure of value, this conception applies in the main. But not in progressive communities. They endeavour to shape the experiences of the young so that instead of reproducing current habits, better habits shall be formed, and this the future adult society be an improvement on their own. (1916/2004, p. 79) A criticism, however, of the progressive approach is that even though it reacts against rote learning, ...this approach was not in itself able to determine which questions were worth asking. When it did, the questions were often those derived from the disciplines’ intellectual or technical concerns, rather than from their value in everyday life or from important social and environmental issues. (Gilbert, 2004, p. 11) Making reference to the epistemological emphasis of progressivist curriculum, being an inquiry process of learning and discuss it as New History, Hoepper and Quanchi write: …these new approaches encourage young people to see that histories are interpretations of the past, and that they are constructed using the available sources of evidence. Thus, histories are partial in two senses – they are incomplete (because no-one can have all the evidence, and tell the whole story) and they reflect the backgrounds and beliefs of the people who produce them (because it’s impossible to tell the objective story of the past). Students are therefore encouraged to read histories more critically – to discern perspectives, standpoints and biases. (2000, p. 5) 68

To what degree the definitions of a progressivist curriculum as included in this section are actualised in school curriculum (rather than only as a theoretical concept) is reported in Chapter 8: Conclusion. 2.8.3 Entitlement approach. Given the recent emergence of the entitlement approach, it is not anticipated that it will feature significantly (if at all) in the analysis of school curriculum for this project. The entitlement curriculum, as applied in this research, does not refer to general access to education for disadvantages or low SES students, as is sometimes the case (see, for example an analysis by Barber of the Union’s response to Thatcher’s education plans in the UK). Although Barber’s statement that an entitlement approach “...emphasizes not only skills, but also confidence, motivation and the love of learning” (Barber, 1992, p. 452) is allied with the way it is used by Gilbert. To be clear, although the entitlement approach to curriculum is not necessarily in opposition or contradiction to the following statement, its purpose in terms of its applicability to Humanities curriculum is not used in the case of this research, as described by Cox: If we do not put a positive developmental model of early childhood education in the place of the formal model we may find that we have created a generation of children among whom many have not received their entitlement to educational opportunities because what was offered was not accessible to them. (1996, p. 766) The entitlement approach, then (which is still in its early years of development), takes on a more futures perspectives, and as applicable to this research is described by Gilbert in the following way: ...an entitlement approach to social education (Gilbert, 2003), where students are given the technical mastery and the best available knowledge of concepts and values as resources for building a desirable society. Students are entitled to be provided with the concepts, processes and skills associated with contemporary institutions and practices, and required for effective participation in society. However, students are also entitled to apply and develop these learnings critically in ways which respect their cultural origins, and which enable them to construct lives according to their developing identities and commitments. (2005, p. 4) 69

emaining the same throughout. Students and teachers need to adopt flexible<br />

approaches so that in the light <strong>of</strong> information gathered, knowledge being constructed,<br />

and skills and processes being enhanced, additional or different questions and/or<br />

hypotheses can be adopted. (Naylor, 2000, p. 8)<br />

Commonly considered a proponent <strong>of</strong> progressive approaches to curriculum, Dewey focused<br />

on developing teaching practices that prepare students for a future society, rather than one<br />

that seeks to only recreate the past. Of this, which can be seen as a clear rejection <strong>of</strong><br />

traditional approaches, Dewey writes:<br />

In static societies, societies which make the maintenance <strong>of</strong> established custom their<br />

measure <strong>of</strong> value, this conception applies in the main. But not in progressive<br />

communities. They endeavour to shape the experiences <strong>of</strong> the young so that instead<br />

<strong>of</strong> reproducing current habits, better habits shall be formed, and this the future adult<br />

society be an improvement on their own. (1916/2004, p. 79)<br />

A criticism, however, <strong>of</strong> the progressive approach is that even though it reacts against rote<br />

learning,<br />

...this approach was not in itself able to determine which questions were worth<br />

asking. When it did, the questions were <strong>of</strong>ten those derived from the disciplines’<br />

intellectual or technical concerns, rather than from their value in everyday life or<br />

from important social and environmental issues. (Gilbert, 2004, p. 11)<br />

Making reference to the epistemological emphasis <strong>of</strong> progressivist curriculum, being an<br />

inquiry process <strong>of</strong> learning and discuss it as New History, Hoepper and Quanchi write:<br />

…these new approaches encourage young people to see that histories are<br />

interpretations <strong>of</strong> the past, and that they are constructed using the available sources<br />

<strong>of</strong> evidence. Thus, histories are partial in two senses – they are incomplete (because<br />

no-one can have all the evidence, and tell the whole story) and they reflect the<br />

backgrounds and beliefs <strong>of</strong> the people who produce them (because it’s impossible to<br />

tell the objective story <strong>of</strong> the past). Students are therefore encouraged to read<br />

histories more critically – to discern perspectives, standpoints and biases. (2000, p. 5)<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!