PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

Whilst this may be an extreme example (so far as its relevance to Australian context is concerned), Barnard also summarises Anyon’s (1979) seminal study that investigated textbooks of United States history, highlighting dominant ideologies present in the History curriculum, and what this revealed about the ‘hidden’ lessons being taught students. Of this, Barnard writes: Her [Anyon’s] findings reveal that textbooks contain ideologies, the presence of which is advantageous to particular groups within society. For example, she writes that the socialist movement at the turn of the century is either not mentioned, or downplayed or disparaged; and labour history is almost totally ignored, together with class conflict and social struggle, while the story of successful capitalists is used as an object lesson for workers: if you work hard and save money, you too can become rich. (2003a, pp. 18-19) An issue that has arisen in recent times and one that clearly demonstrates the contested nature of History curriculum is the furor that erupted in Israel over the use of the term Nakba which translates to catastrophe, “an Arabic term used to describe the creation of Israel as a ‘catastrophe’…” (Israel to ban 1948 ‘catastrophe references in Arab Israeli school books, 2009, para. 1). In this, a very contentious issue, the Education Minister, Gideon Saar is reported as stating “the decision to integrate this idea into teaching for Arab Israeli several years ago constitutes an error that will be corrected in the next school books currently being prepared” (Israel to ban 1948 ‘catastrophe references in Arab Israeli school books, 2009, para. 3). This sparked emotional responses to this particular construction of national identity, in particular accusations of bias (see, for example, Shulman, 2009). What this and the other studies briefly outlined in this subsection demonstrate is the widespread contestation of national identity across individual nation states; and the emotional responses that come about as a result, especially when connected with the education of each nation’s young citizens. In addition to the assertion of a mytho-history being presented to school students through representations of national history made by Barnard (2003a), other studies, such as Hearn (2005) identify and survey the history of mythmaking in history of Australia as a nation-state. Smith also refers to myth-making in constructing a national identity, writing: …generations of a particular community are formed in their collective life through the memories, myths and traditions of the community into which they are born and 60

educated…the communal past defines to a large extent our identity, which in turn helps to determine collective goals and destinies…Traditions, myths, history and symbols must all grow out of the existing, living memories and beliefs of the people who are to compose the nation. (1993, p. 16) In concluding this section, analysing representations of British heritages and Indigenous representations within school curriculum, as this project does, invariably raises questions of nationalism and how it is being constructed; an issue that needs to be contextualized to the era it was produced. As Giroux writes “as a social construction, nationalism does not rest upon a particular politics, but takes its form within rather than outside of specific, historical, social and cultural contexts” (1998, p. 180). The importance of locating an analysis of school curriculum, for example as demonstrated through textbooks, in their historical context (as this research does by identifying three distinct eras for the analysis to be situated in), is explained by Gilbert as: In constructing and interpreting images of text content, we should remember that theoretical images are abstracted from a process which draws on multiple sources of meaning produced in particular situations. Text contents themselves are the product and retain the traces of competing discourses. Readings given to texts vary with the discursive practices of different social sites…a more frequent cause for concern…has been the reliance of such research on the analysis of texts removed from their context of use. (1989, p. 68) Given the emotions associated with establishing, identifying and teaching national history and thereby creating a national identity that is often unable to be clearly articulated across a range of citizens, reflected in the school History curriculum, “history textbooks, therefore, are not likely to straightforwardly, unproblematically relate the ‘facts’ of history, just as they are” (Barnard, 2003b, p. 247). 2.8 Curriculum Approaches in Humanities Disciplines Various approaches to curriculum knowledges have been offered as ways to deconstruct the theoretical underpinnings of what is taught in schools. For example, approaches specifically related to History curriculum analysis, described by Cullip (2007) include: historical biographical narrative; historical explanatory recount; descriptive historical report; forecast report; and factual explanation. These approaches are not appropriate for the analysis 61

educated…the communal past defines to a large extent our identity, which in turn<br />

helps to determine collective goals and destinies…Traditions, myths, history and<br />

symbols must all grow out <strong>of</strong> the existing, living memories and beliefs <strong>of</strong> the people<br />

who are to compose the nation. (1993, p. 16)<br />

In concluding this section, analysing representations <strong>of</strong> British heritages and Indigenous<br />

representations within school curriculum, as this project does, invariably raises questions <strong>of</strong><br />

nationalism and how it is being constructed; an issue that needs to be contextualized to the<br />

era it was produced. As Giroux writes “as a social construction, nationalism does not rest<br />

upon a particular politics, but takes its form within rather than outside <strong>of</strong> specific, historical,<br />

social and cultural contexts” (1998, p. 180). The importance <strong>of</strong> locating an analysis <strong>of</strong> school<br />

curriculum, for example as demonstrated through textbooks, in their historical context (as this<br />

research does by identifying three distinct eras for the analysis to be situated in), is explained<br />

by Gilbert as:<br />

In constructing and interpreting images <strong>of</strong> text content, we should remember that<br />

theoretical images are abstracted from a process which draws on multiple sources <strong>of</strong><br />

meaning produced in particular situations. Text contents themselves are the product<br />

and retain the traces <strong>of</strong> competing discourses. Readings given to texts vary with the<br />

discursive practices <strong>of</strong> different social sites…a more frequent cause for concern…has<br />

been the reliance <strong>of</strong> such research on the analysis <strong>of</strong> texts removed from their context<br />

<strong>of</strong> use. (1989, p. 68)<br />

Given the emotions associated with establishing, identifying and teaching national history<br />

and thereby creating a national identity that is <strong>of</strong>ten unable to be clearly articulated across a<br />

range <strong>of</strong> citizens, reflected in the school History curriculum, “history textbooks, therefore, are<br />

not likely to straightforwardly, unproblematically relate the ‘facts’ <strong>of</strong> history, just as they are”<br />

(Barnard, 2003b, p. 247).<br />

2.8 Curriculum Approaches in Humanities Disciplines<br />

Various approaches to curriculum knowledges have been <strong>of</strong>fered as ways to deconstruct the<br />

theoretical underpinnings <strong>of</strong> what is taught in schools. For example, approaches specifically<br />

related to History curriculum analysis, described by Cullip (2007) include: historical<br />

biographical narrative; historical explanatory recount; descriptive historical report; forecast<br />

report; and factual explanation. These approaches are not appropriate for the analysis<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!