11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(p. 115)<br />

Passage 9:<br />

(p. 159)<br />

511<br />

Themes emerging:<br />

Federation (including<br />

leading up to)<br />

Primarily, issues <strong>of</strong> Federation are only to<br />

describe the mechanics <strong>of</strong> the workings <strong>of</strong><br />

the constitution and Parliament.<br />

Also, topics described are removed from<br />

GB’s involvement, therefore analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

these passages not necessary. This could<br />

be a point to make in the final analysis<br />

when looking at other textbook<br />

representations <strong>of</strong> federation from earlier<br />

times.<br />

From WWI section <strong>of</strong> the textbook, pp. 105-128.<br />

Themes emerging: WWI<br />

Discourse: Australian involvement as soldiers/raw power, not strategists or decision makers.<br />

Australia is regarded as valuable due to the raw power <strong>of</strong> its soldiers, rather than for any involvement in<br />

decision making. This is made obvious through the statement: “The Germans broke through and once more<br />

reached the Marne within forty miles <strong>of</strong> Paris; further north they almost captured Amiens. If it had been taken<br />

the British and French armies would have been separated, but a brilliant attack by the Australians who had<br />

rushed up to the danger point, stopped their progress.” (Dunlop & Palfrey, 1932a, p. 104, emphasis added) . Here, the perspective that Australians are involved in this battle <strong>of</strong> WWI only in a support<br />

role capacity is made clear. Australians providing assistance to GB is also clear in other sections <strong>of</strong> this wider<br />

narrative. For example, the following description is provided <strong>of</strong> The Australian and New Zealand Army Corps<br />

(Anzac) soldiers: “The Turks...made an attempt to capture the Suez Canal in order to cut Britain’s<br />

communication...For the remainder <strong>of</strong> the war the Australian and New Zealand troops played an important part<br />

in the destruction <strong>of</strong> Turkish power in the Sinai Peninsula, Palestine and Syria” (Dunlop & Palfrey, 1932a, p.<br />

108). So Australian national history is represented mediated through their participation with GB in major events.<br />

Discourse: Australia as part <strong>of</strong> GB by agreeing to participate in WWI<br />

Even though this is a Queensland History textbook for Australian students, that closely follows the syllabus,<br />

Australia’s involvement in WWI is portrayed more as a footnote to the entire conflict. Whilst it is important not<br />

to overstate Australia’s contribution to this conflict, which in comparison to other nations, was quite small,<br />

given the audience, the expectation was that there would be more Australia-centric content. In one way it is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!