11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

oversimplified and shallow analysis <strong>of</strong> the syllabus, intended for a popular audience, Bolt’s<br />

main concern over the syllabus is the left-wing ideologies that present overtly in the syllabus,<br />

citing examples such as “…students in Year One and Two are already being blooded in the<br />

war against sexism, being told to study “perceptions <strong>of</strong> gender roles in various settings”,<br />

“equality <strong>of</strong> opportunity” and “stereotypes related to work roles” (2000, n.p., emphasis in<br />

original). In his commentary, Bolt criticises and blames the Beattie Labor government for the<br />

syllabus, writing:<br />

…the Beattie Government’s education experts have launched the most radical<br />

attempt in Australia to indoctrinate children in key Left-wing-values.<br />

Or, as the syllabus itself puts is, teachers much teach the “key values <strong>of</strong><br />

democratic process, social justice, ecological and economic sustainability and<br />

peace.”<br />

Teach the good opinions. And don’t fuss too much about facts. (2000, n.p.)<br />

The Queensland response to Bolt’s article sustained attention on this curriculum issue, a<br />

significant point given that school topics are usually included in media reports as one topic<br />

issues. On September 16, 2000 The Courier Mail published a response, written by leading<br />

history educators in Queensland universities, who, in acknowledging the controversy<br />

surrounding the SOSE syllabus, <strong>of</strong>fered an alternative perspective to the one that had become<br />

publicly dominant. Hoepper et al., while considering debates over curriculum not negative in<br />

essence, wrote “...debates, when rigorous, informed and balanced, are valuable” (2000, p.<br />

19), but noted that the multiple perspectives which had been forming on the merits <strong>of</strong> the<br />

SOSE syllabus were focused on three main issues <strong>of</strong> the curriculum (which they claim had<br />

become intertwined) that had attracted particularly high levels <strong>of</strong> criticisms and confusion:<br />

the place <strong>of</strong> history and geography in schools; the need for rigor in the curriculum; and<br />

developing understandings <strong>of</strong> the purposes <strong>of</strong> education.<br />

Bolt maintained his criticisms <strong>of</strong> the SOSE syllabus and other areas <strong>of</strong> the school curriculum<br />

he believed to be linked with the ongoing history/culture wars throughout the time period to<br />

2007. His views were buoyed perhaps in part by then-Prime Minister John Howard’s<br />

conservative approach to education and ‘three-cheers’ view <strong>of</strong> Australian history, and<br />

enjoying popularity due in part to the dominant discourses <strong>of</strong> conservatism, supported by<br />

496

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!