11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

valid reasons for living and hoping in an ever changing and challenging world.<br />

(PANDF, n.d., p. 4)<br />

Former NSW Premier, Bob Carr, consistently vocal in his criticism <strong>of</strong> the integrated<br />

curriculum model that has developed within the SOSE KLA, maintains that schools should<br />

teach students subjects <strong>of</strong> the social sciences as separate subjects, for example Geography and<br />

History, rather than combined with a range <strong>of</strong> other subject areas and disciplines. At a<br />

keynote address at a History Teachers’ Conference while still Premier <strong>of</strong> NSW, Carropened<br />

with a very clear statement <strong>of</strong> his preference for how History should be taught, dismissing the<br />

range <strong>of</strong> studies that SOSE encompasses by asserting “History is not social studies. It’s not<br />

cultural studies. It’s not civics. It’s not anything else. It’s history...It’s the science <strong>of</strong> knowing<br />

where we’ve been” (B. Carr, 2001, p. 8). The separation, rather than integration, <strong>of</strong><br />

humanities subjects has been at the centre <strong>of</strong> much controversy and was reignited in 2006 by<br />

then-Federal Education Minister, Julie Bishop, who touted the introduction <strong>of</strong> a mandatory<br />

Australian history subject for all Australian schools within the national curriculum (Bishop,<br />

2006).<br />

Another significant issue related to school education during the time period <strong>of</strong> the<br />

history/culture wars, can be seen by the increasing direct control <strong>of</strong> the Federal government<br />

in state-based education. Although this continued with the Labor government, it is not (at this<br />

point in time, but antagonism is increasing, particularly with the controversial publication <strong>of</strong><br />

school data on a website, which has led to the construction <strong>of</strong> league tables) at the<br />

antagonistic level it reached between Labor state Department <strong>of</strong> Education ministers and thethen<br />

Liberal Federal government in the early-mid 2000s. During this period, the relationship<br />

between the Federal and State Departments <strong>of</strong> Education disintegrated to such a degree,<br />

newspapers were reporting on it. For example, The Australian ran a headline “Nelson ‘feral’,<br />

claim ministers” (McNamara, 2005, n.p.), reporting on the relationship breakdown between<br />

then-Education Minister Dr Brendan Nelson and the various state Ministers <strong>of</strong> Education.<br />

Queensland Education Minister, Rod Welford described the actions <strong>of</strong> Nelson as “It’s<br />

becoming a matter <strong>of</strong> increasing concern that Nelson’s antics are not consistent with what is<br />

needed to improve the system” (as cited in McNamara, 2005, para. 8). The discontent<br />

between the federal and state governments can be seen in light <strong>of</strong> the rise in pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> school<br />

curriculum, standards, reporting and one-<strong>of</strong>f topical issues through media reporting during<br />

this time period. The reporting <strong>of</strong> disagreements points to the continuation in the public<br />

484

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!