PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
"There's real anger about that," agreed the Prime Minister. (November 22, 2007, para. 9-11) Rudd, on the other hand, avoided engaging in the history/culture wars debate, seeming to engage only with practical topics such as the national curriculum, about which he had expressed his perspective early in 2007 in consideration of the federal election later that year. One reason for his decision (undoubtedly strategically considered) not to enter any history/culture wars debate can be found when responding (as the new Prime Minister, having defeated Howard) to why he presented an apology to Indigenous Australians of the so-named Stolen Generations. In February, 2008 G. Henderson wrote, “...the Prime Minister declared that his position on the apology had nothing to do with the culture wars which he dismissed as “abstract intellectual academic theoretical debates”” (2008c, para. 12). Even before the 2007 federal election took place, and in the days leading up to it, the end of the history/culture wars was being discussed. Certainly post the 2007 federal election, this debate seems to have largely disappeared from the public domain. The end of the history/culture wars (perhaps) called prematurely in 2006 by various commentators. For example, journalist Michelle Grattan wrote an article in The Age with the headline reading “Howard claims victory in national culture wars” (2006, p.1); and Inga Clendinnen’s wrote “the ‘history wars’ might be over, but history is in the news again because the Prime Minster has put it there” (Clendinnen, 2006, p.1). The election defeat of Prime Minister John Howard on 24 th November, 2007 saw a more rigorous assertion that the end of the cultural wars had arrived, or if not the end, then it was hoped the newly elected Rudd government would “…signify an important cultural realignment for the nation” (Soutphommasane, 2007, para. 8), moving away from Howard who “...yearned for the certainties of the old Australia” and a “‘relaxed and comfortable’ national identity” (2007, para. 9). Whether this is actually the case or not is a debatable point, and one which Noel Pearson took up in his The Weekend Australian column the weekend following Howard’s loss. Discussing the resumption of parliament led by a new government, and the issue of saying sorry for injustices of the past towards Indigenous Australian, N. Pearson wrote that this “…draws the new PM and the Labor government immediately back to ground zero of the Australian history and culture wars of the past decade and a half” (2007, p. 23). There were favourable recollections from conservative commentators, even internationally, of Howard’s 478
stance towards history curriculum during his time as Prime Minister, as seen, for example through comments made by Canadian journalist Mark Steyn, And that brings us to the Coalition's next great strand of strategic clarity. At his 2006 education summit, Howard called for "a root and branch renewal of Australian history in our schools, with a restoration of narrative instead of what I labelled the 'fragmented stew of themes and issues"'. As he explained at the Quadrant 50th anniversary celebration: "This is about ensuring children are actually taught their national inheritance." The absence of a "narrative" and an "inheritance" is a big part of the reason that British subjects born and bred blow up the London Tube, why young Canadian Muslims with no memory of living in any other society plot to behead their own prime minister. You can't assimilate immigrants and minorities unless you give them something to assimilate to. It's one thing to teach children their history "warts and all", quite another to obsess on the warts at the expense of all else. The West's demographic weakness is merely the physical embodiment of a broader loss of civilisational confidence. (Steyn, 2007, para.14-16) The claim made that the end of the history and cultural wars had arrived is a convenient place to conclude the mapping of them for this dissertation. Whether a cessation of hostilities continues remains to be seen, however even if these debates continue, they will take on a different direction and focus, as someone, according to N. Person, who potentially holds himself as “…transcending the polarities…” (2007, p. 23). It would appear, with the advent of the new style Labor parliamentarian, it is doubtful the history and cultural wars will cease, but rather continue albeit in a different direction, with less focus on polarisation of views, and more on what could be practically actioned, especially in the field of education. Perhaps the final curtain in the history/culture wars, or at least this iteration of it, came with Kevin Rudd’s apology to the Stolen Generations. In terms of media coverage, it can be seen as, if not the end of the history/culture wars, certainly the close of a chapter in the ongoing debates. During the speech Rudd criticised the Howard government and others who had participated in the ongoing debates, stating: These stories cry out to be heard. They cry out for an apology... 479
- Page 442 and 443: Fiske, J., Hodge, B., & Turner, G.
- Page 444 and 445: Henderson, G. (2008b, August 12). N
- Page 446 and 447: Kitson, J. (Interviewer), & Malouf,
- Page 448 and 449: Melleuish, G. (1998). The packaging
- Page 450 and 451: Roberts, M. (2004). Postmodernism a
- Page 452 and 453: van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Semiotics a
- Page 454 and 455: 440
- Page 456 and 457: 442
- Page 458 and 459: particular, this includes taking on
- Page 460 and 461: The mapping of these debates conclu
- Page 462 and 463: A1.1.4 Terminology. The term histor
- Page 464 and 465: The similarities of the debates acr
- Page 466 and 467: over...an overrun of divisive multi
- Page 468 and 469: political cartoon satirist, Peter N
- Page 470 and 471: A1.5.1 April 23, 1993: Geoffrey Bla
- Page 472 and 473: After an initial furor, this curric
- Page 474 and 475: A1.5.4 October and November 1996: J
- Page 476 and 477: I take a very different view. I bel
- Page 478 and 479: history/culture wars in the public
- Page 480 and 481: parallels between ideologies presen
- Page 482 and 483: into “politically correct new age
- Page 484 and 485: Root and branch renewal of history
- Page 486 and 487: Further in his lecture, Manne then
- Page 488 and 489: Throughout the years that the histo
- Page 490 and 491: A people with a sense of a fair go
- Page 494 and 495: Instead, from the nation's Parliame
- Page 496 and 497: asis for critical (and often deriso
- Page 498 and 499: valid reasons for living and hoping
- Page 500 and 501: “centrally prescribed curriculum
- Page 502 and 503: elativism in school curriculum, spe
- Page 504 and 505: supporting PM Howard’s call for a
- Page 506 and 507: The politicisation of the curriculu
- Page 508 and 509: Government in the rundown to the en
- Page 510 and 511: oversimplified and shallow analysis
- Page 512 and 513: than the combination of history, ge
- Page 514 and 515: Language used by opponents of the c
- Page 516 and 517: invades school curriculum” (Lane,
- Page 518 and 519: 504
- Page 520 and 521: 506
- Page 522 and 523: Appendix D: Sample Data Analyses Ti
- Page 524 and 525: (p. 110) Passage 6: (pp. 110-111) P
- Page 526 and 527: probably good that this was not cas
- Page 528: Overall, a very unemotional account
stance towards history curriculum during his time as Prime Minister, as seen, for example<br />
through comments made by Canadian journalist Mark Steyn,<br />
And that brings us to the Coalition's next great strand <strong>of</strong> strategic clarity. At his 2006<br />
education summit, Howard called for "a root and branch renewal <strong>of</strong> Australian<br />
history in our schools, with a restoration <strong>of</strong> narrative instead <strong>of</strong> what I labelled the<br />
'fragmented stew <strong>of</strong> themes and issues"'.<br />
As he explained at the Quadrant 50th anniversary celebration: "This is about<br />
ensuring children are actually taught their national inheritance." The absence <strong>of</strong> a<br />
"narrative" and an "inheritance" is a big part <strong>of</strong> the reason that British subjects born<br />
and bred blow up the London Tube, why young Canadian Muslims with no memory<br />
<strong>of</strong> living in any other society plot to behead their own prime minister.<br />
You can't assimilate immigrants and minorities unless you give them<br />
something to assimilate to. It's one thing to teach children their history "warts and<br />
all", quite another to obsess on the warts at the expense <strong>of</strong> all else. The West's<br />
demographic weakness is merely the physical embodiment <strong>of</strong> a broader loss <strong>of</strong><br />
civilisational confidence. (Steyn, 2007, para.14-16)<br />
The claim made that the end <strong>of</strong> the history and cultural wars had arrived is a convenient place<br />
to conclude the mapping <strong>of</strong> them for this dissertation. Whether a cessation <strong>of</strong> hostilities<br />
continues remains to be seen, however even if these debates continue, they will take on a<br />
different direction and focus, as someone, according to N. Person, who potentially holds<br />
himself as “…transcending the polarities…” (2007, p. 23). It would appear, with the advent<br />
<strong>of</strong> the new style Labor parliamentarian, it is doubtful the history and cultural wars will cease,<br />
but rather continue albeit in a different direction, with less focus on polarisation <strong>of</strong> views, and<br />
more on what could be practically actioned, especially in the field <strong>of</strong> education.<br />
Perhaps the final curtain in the history/culture wars, or at least this iteration <strong>of</strong> it, came with<br />
Kevin Rudd’s apology to the Stolen Generations. In terms <strong>of</strong> media coverage, it can be seen<br />
as, if not the end <strong>of</strong> the history/culture wars, certainly the close <strong>of</strong> a chapter in the ongoing<br />
debates. During the speech Rudd criticised the Howard government and others who had<br />
participated in the ongoing debates, stating:<br />
These stories cry out to be heard. They cry out for an apology...<br />
479