PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
A people with a sense of a fair go for all carved deep into our national soul. A people also alert to the needs of our friends and allies. These are the values which summoned forth the sons and daughters of ANZAC over the last 100 years from our smallest towns, our greatest cities and our most remote outback. (Rudd, 2008, lines 19-29) The portrayal of the ANZAC legend (within the context of the history/culture wars in education) can be seen to have reached a pinnacle in 2006 with the selection of an image of the well known WWI soldier, Private John Simpson Kirkpatrick 19 and his donkey for the Australian Federal Government’s Department of Education, Science and Training poster, Values for Australian schooling, mandated by the Australian Government to be posted in a prominent place in every school across Australia (see Naylor, 2007 for a detailed response to the selection of Simpson and his donkey and the ensuing debates). The decision made by Education Minister, Dr Brendan Nelson to have Simpson as the face of values in Australian schools was one which within itself caused controversy, not much less the debate surrounding the actual nine values selected for Australian school children to learn. The debate surrounding Simpson and his donkey, this time unlike most other major turning points in the history/culture wars, originated from school discourses and then entered the public domain. So fierce was the debate surrounding whether Simpson and his donkey represented core Australian values, with a renewed call for Simpson to be awarded the Victoria Cross made by one side of the debate and the other side against a soldier representing Australian values in schools. The poster survived the public debates, a triumph for the conservative Howard government. This did not go unnoticed by conservative-minded commentators, such as Gerard Henderson, who in an article titled ‘A legend wins the culture wars’ and printed on Anzac Day, wrote: 19 John Simpson Kirkpatrick has become the ‘face’ of Anzac Day, representative of Australian soldiers and a more broad understanding of ‘mateship’. Nominated for, but did not receive, a Victoria Cross for Bravery, Kirkpatrick, known most commonly as Simpson and his Donkey, taxied wounded soldiers on the back of a donkey from the battlefield of Gallipoli to receive medical attention on the beach of Anzac Cove. He was killed by gunfire within four weeks of landing at Gallipoli. He has since become synonymous with courage as part of the Anzac legend mythmaking. 476
It is unlikely that self-proclaimed expert opinion will change the accepted view of Simpson and his donkey. In other words, it seems that the Nelson interpretation will prevail. The fact is that, whatever his background and whatever his views, the values which Simpson demonstrated at Gallipoli are much admired - from the bottom up. (G. Henderson, 2006a, para. 13) How the Anzac legend and WWI more generally act as examples of British heritages in school History textbooks, is the focus of Chapter 5: Before and Immediately After WWI. A1.6.2 End of the history/culture wars? Leading up to the federal election of 24 th November, 2007 the history/culture wars had widened in scope to, as Wimmer described, a paradigm wars focusing significantly, almost solely, on the impact on education of the ideological struggle between the conservative right and (so-called) progressive-left. Miranda Devine, a journalist for The Sydney Morning Herald and supporter of John Howard and the conservative right approach to the history/culture wars, particularly its application to school contexts, interviewed Howard and his wife Janette. During the interview, the topic of history/culture wars and their impact on schooling was broached. This topic was seen as so important to the Prime Ministership of John Howard that on the eve of contesting what could have been his fifth term as Australian Prime Minister he considered it a topic in need of discussion. Reporting on the aspect of the history/culture wars that surfaced in this interview Devine writes: Rudd's party has long been hostage to the education unions and educationists of the so-called progressive left, who persist with 40-year-old radical theories such as whole-word reading and student-directed learning, despite a generation of conclusive proof they do the most harm to the underprivileged children they profess to care most about. As Janette Howard, a former teacher, said during my interview with her husband at Kirribilli House, education is the ground zero of the culture wars, which she prefers to call a "standards war". In her travels with him on the campaign trail she has found that "people are concerned about what [children] can't do anymore, that they can't spell, they can't add up … or they don't know enough history". 477
- Page 440 and 441: Department of Public Instruction. (
- Page 442 and 443: Fiske, J., Hodge, B., & Turner, G.
- Page 444 and 445: Henderson, G. (2008b, August 12). N
- Page 446 and 447: Kitson, J. (Interviewer), & Malouf,
- Page 448 and 449: Melleuish, G. (1998). The packaging
- Page 450 and 451: Roberts, M. (2004). Postmodernism a
- Page 452 and 453: van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Semiotics a
- Page 454 and 455: 440
- Page 456 and 457: 442
- Page 458 and 459: particular, this includes taking on
- Page 460 and 461: The mapping of these debates conclu
- Page 462 and 463: A1.1.4 Terminology. The term histor
- Page 464 and 465: The similarities of the debates acr
- Page 466 and 467: over...an overrun of divisive multi
- Page 468 and 469: political cartoon satirist, Peter N
- Page 470 and 471: A1.5.1 April 23, 1993: Geoffrey Bla
- Page 472 and 473: After an initial furor, this curric
- Page 474 and 475: A1.5.4 October and November 1996: J
- Page 476 and 477: I take a very different view. I bel
- Page 478 and 479: history/culture wars in the public
- Page 480 and 481: parallels between ideologies presen
- Page 482 and 483: into “politically correct new age
- Page 484 and 485: Root and branch renewal of history
- Page 486 and 487: Further in his lecture, Manne then
- Page 488 and 489: Throughout the years that the histo
- Page 492 and 493: "There's real anger about that," ag
- Page 494 and 495: Instead, from the nation's Parliame
- Page 496 and 497: asis for critical (and often deriso
- Page 498 and 499: valid reasons for living and hoping
- Page 500 and 501: “centrally prescribed curriculum
- Page 502 and 503: elativism in school curriculum, spe
- Page 504 and 505: supporting PM Howard’s call for a
- Page 506 and 507: The politicisation of the curriculu
- Page 508 and 509: Government in the rundown to the en
- Page 510 and 511: oversimplified and shallow analysis
- Page 512 and 513: than the combination of history, ge
- Page 514 and 515: Language used by opponents of the c
- Page 516 and 517: invades school curriculum” (Lane,
- Page 518 and 519: 504
- Page 520 and 521: 506
- Page 522 and 523: Appendix D: Sample Data Analyses Ti
- Page 524 and 525: (p. 110) Passage 6: (pp. 110-111) P
- Page 526 and 527: probably good that this was not cas
- Page 528: Overall, a very unemotional account
It is unlikely that self-proclaimed expert opinion will change the accepted view <strong>of</strong><br />
Simpson and his donkey. In other words, it seems that the Nelson interpretation will<br />
prevail. The fact is that, whatever his background and whatever his views, the values<br />
which Simpson demonstrated at Gallipoli are much admired - from the bottom up.<br />
(G. Henderson, 2006a, para. 13)<br />
How the Anzac legend and WWI more generally act as examples <strong>of</strong> British heritages in<br />
school History textbooks, is the focus <strong>of</strong> Chapter 5: Before and Immediately After WWI.<br />
A1.6.2 End <strong>of</strong> the history/culture wars?<br />
Leading up to the federal election <strong>of</strong> 24 th November, 2007 the history/culture wars had<br />
widened in scope to, as Wimmer described, a paradigm wars focusing significantly, almost<br />
solely, on the impact on education <strong>of</strong> the ideological struggle between the conservative right<br />
and (so-called) progressive-left. Miranda Devine, a journalist for The Sydney Morning Herald<br />
and supporter <strong>of</strong> John Howard and the conservative right approach to the history/culture<br />
wars, particularly its application to school contexts, interviewed Howard and his wife Janette.<br />
During the interview, the topic <strong>of</strong> history/culture wars and their impact on schooling was<br />
broached. This topic was seen as so important to the Prime Ministership <strong>of</strong> John Howard that<br />
on the eve <strong>of</strong> contesting what could have been his fifth term as Australian Prime Minister he<br />
considered it a topic in need <strong>of</strong> discussion. Reporting on the aspect <strong>of</strong> the history/culture wars<br />
that surfaced in this interview Devine writes:<br />
Rudd's party has long been hostage to the education unions and educationists <strong>of</strong> the<br />
so-called progressive left, who persist with 40-year-old radical theories such as<br />
whole-word reading and student-directed learning, despite a generation <strong>of</strong> conclusive<br />
pro<strong>of</strong> they do the most harm to the underprivileged children they pr<strong>of</strong>ess to care most<br />
about. As Janette Howard, a former teacher, said during my interview with her<br />
husband at Kirribilli House, education is the ground zero <strong>of</strong> the culture wars, which<br />
she prefers to call a "standards war".<br />
In her travels with him on the campaign trail she has found that "people are<br />
concerned about what [children] can't do anymore, that they can't spell, they can't<br />
add up … or they don't know enough history".<br />
477