PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

A people with a sense of a fair go for all carved deep into our national soul. A people also alert to the needs of our friends and allies. These are the values which summoned forth the sons and daughters of ANZAC over the last 100 years from our smallest towns, our greatest cities and our most remote outback. (Rudd, 2008, lines 19-29) The portrayal of the ANZAC legend (within the context of the history/culture wars in education) can be seen to have reached a pinnacle in 2006 with the selection of an image of the well known WWI soldier, Private John Simpson Kirkpatrick 19 and his donkey for the Australian Federal Government’s Department of Education, Science and Training poster, Values for Australian schooling, mandated by the Australian Government to be posted in a prominent place in every school across Australia (see Naylor, 2007 for a detailed response to the selection of Simpson and his donkey and the ensuing debates). The decision made by Education Minister, Dr Brendan Nelson to have Simpson as the face of values in Australian schools was one which within itself caused controversy, not much less the debate surrounding the actual nine values selected for Australian school children to learn. The debate surrounding Simpson and his donkey, this time unlike most other major turning points in the history/culture wars, originated from school discourses and then entered the public domain. So fierce was the debate surrounding whether Simpson and his donkey represented core Australian values, with a renewed call for Simpson to be awarded the Victoria Cross made by one side of the debate and the other side against a soldier representing Australian values in schools. The poster survived the public debates, a triumph for the conservative Howard government. This did not go unnoticed by conservative-minded commentators, such as Gerard Henderson, who in an article titled ‘A legend wins the culture wars’ and printed on Anzac Day, wrote: 19 John Simpson Kirkpatrick has become the ‘face’ of Anzac Day, representative of Australian soldiers and a more broad understanding of ‘mateship’. Nominated for, but did not receive, a Victoria Cross for Bravery, Kirkpatrick, known most commonly as Simpson and his Donkey, taxied wounded soldiers on the back of a donkey from the battlefield of Gallipoli to receive medical attention on the beach of Anzac Cove. He was killed by gunfire within four weeks of landing at Gallipoli. He has since become synonymous with courage as part of the Anzac legend mythmaking. 476

It is unlikely that self-proclaimed expert opinion will change the accepted view of Simpson and his donkey. In other words, it seems that the Nelson interpretation will prevail. The fact is that, whatever his background and whatever his views, the values which Simpson demonstrated at Gallipoli are much admired - from the bottom up. (G. Henderson, 2006a, para. 13) How the Anzac legend and WWI more generally act as examples of British heritages in school History textbooks, is the focus of Chapter 5: Before and Immediately After WWI. A1.6.2 End of the history/culture wars? Leading up to the federal election of 24 th November, 2007 the history/culture wars had widened in scope to, as Wimmer described, a paradigm wars focusing significantly, almost solely, on the impact on education of the ideological struggle between the conservative right and (so-called) progressive-left. Miranda Devine, a journalist for The Sydney Morning Herald and supporter of John Howard and the conservative right approach to the history/culture wars, particularly its application to school contexts, interviewed Howard and his wife Janette. During the interview, the topic of history/culture wars and their impact on schooling was broached. This topic was seen as so important to the Prime Ministership of John Howard that on the eve of contesting what could have been his fifth term as Australian Prime Minister he considered it a topic in need of discussion. Reporting on the aspect of the history/culture wars that surfaced in this interview Devine writes: Rudd's party has long been hostage to the education unions and educationists of the so-called progressive left, who persist with 40-year-old radical theories such as whole-word reading and student-directed learning, despite a generation of conclusive proof they do the most harm to the underprivileged children they profess to care most about. As Janette Howard, a former teacher, said during my interview with her husband at Kirribilli House, education is the ground zero of the culture wars, which she prefers to call a "standards war". In her travels with him on the campaign trail she has found that "people are concerned about what [children] can't do anymore, that they can't spell, they can't add up … or they don't know enough history". 477

It is unlikely that self-proclaimed expert opinion will change the accepted view <strong>of</strong><br />

Simpson and his donkey. In other words, it seems that the Nelson interpretation will<br />

prevail. The fact is that, whatever his background and whatever his views, the values<br />

which Simpson demonstrated at Gallipoli are much admired - from the bottom up.<br />

(G. Henderson, 2006a, para. 13)<br />

How the Anzac legend and WWI more generally act as examples <strong>of</strong> British heritages in<br />

school History textbooks, is the focus <strong>of</strong> Chapter 5: Before and Immediately After WWI.<br />

A1.6.2 End <strong>of</strong> the history/culture wars?<br />

Leading up to the federal election <strong>of</strong> 24 th November, 2007 the history/culture wars had<br />

widened in scope to, as Wimmer described, a paradigm wars focusing significantly, almost<br />

solely, on the impact on education <strong>of</strong> the ideological struggle between the conservative right<br />

and (so-called) progressive-left. Miranda Devine, a journalist for The Sydney Morning Herald<br />

and supporter <strong>of</strong> John Howard and the conservative right approach to the history/culture<br />

wars, particularly its application to school contexts, interviewed Howard and his wife Janette.<br />

During the interview, the topic <strong>of</strong> history/culture wars and their impact on schooling was<br />

broached. This topic was seen as so important to the Prime Ministership <strong>of</strong> John Howard that<br />

on the eve <strong>of</strong> contesting what could have been his fifth term as Australian Prime Minister he<br />

considered it a topic in need <strong>of</strong> discussion. Reporting on the aspect <strong>of</strong> the history/culture wars<br />

that surfaced in this interview Devine writes:<br />

Rudd's party has long been hostage to the education unions and educationists <strong>of</strong> the<br />

so-called progressive left, who persist with 40-year-old radical theories such as<br />

whole-word reading and student-directed learning, despite a generation <strong>of</strong> conclusive<br />

pro<strong>of</strong> they do the most harm to the underprivileged children they pr<strong>of</strong>ess to care most<br />

about. As Janette Howard, a former teacher, said during my interview with her<br />

husband at Kirribilli House, education is the ground zero <strong>of</strong> the culture wars, which<br />

she prefers to call a "standards war".<br />

In her travels with him on the campaign trail she has found that "people are<br />

concerned about what [children] can't do anymore, that they can't spell, they can't<br />

add up … or they don't know enough history".<br />

477

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!