PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

I take a very different view. I believe that the balance sheet of our history is one of heroic achievement and that we have achieved much more as a nation of which we can be proud than of which we should be ashamed. In saying that, I do not exclude or ignore specific aspects of our past where we are rightly held to account. Injustices were done in Australia, and no-one should obscure or minimise them. We need to acknowledge as a nation the realities of what European settlement has meant for the first Australians, the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders, and in particular the assault on their traditions and the physical abuse they endured. (1996b, n.p., emphasis added) Combined, these speeches represent the view Howard held throughout his Prime Ministership of Australian history and how it should be remembered (although it could be argued that his perspectives gradually became even more politically conservative, with a lesser emphasis on remembering any negative aspects of Australia’s history particularly in the context of school curriculum debates). Reactions for and against these types of statements and perspectives held by Howard are examined in greater depth in the Continuation and proliferation of the history/culture wars section of this overview and demonstrate how this view pervaded public debate over the eleven years from 1996-2007. It has, therefore, been necessary to quote Howard at length here, so that an accurate portrayal of his views can be presented, enabling a strong critique of his, and other conservatives’, views on this topic with the history/culture wars. A1.5.5 May 27, 1997: Howard’s Australian Reconciliation Convention speech. The Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation, set up through an Act of Parliament from 1991 to 2001, was legislated to address the following objective: The object of the establishment of the Council is to promote a process of reconciliation between Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders and the wider Australian community, based on an appreciation by the Australian community as a whole of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and achievements and of the unique position of Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders as the indigenous peoples of Australia, and by means that include the fostering of an ongoing national 462

commitment to co-operate to address Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander disadvantage. (Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation Act 1991 Part 2, s. 5) In May 1997, the national council hosted the Australian Reconciliation Convention. John Howard created national attention and wide-spread controversy in the eyes of some and praise by others for his commitment to a process of practical reconciliation (as distinct from an official government apology) through offering the following opinion of Australian history in his Opening Address, ...all Australians - indigenous and otherwise - need to acknowledge realistically the interaction of our histories. Our purpose in doing so should not be to apportion blame and guilt for past wrongs, but to commit to a practical programme of action that will remove the enduring legacies of disadvantage. At the same time, we need to acknowledge openly that the treatment accorded to many indigenous Australians over a significant period of European settlement represents the most blemished chapter in our history. Clearly, there were injustices done and no-one should obscure or minimise them. (Howard, 1997, n.p.) This part of his speech, particularly the mention of injustices experienced by Indigenous Australians over an extended time period as a “blemished chapter” caused many of the delegates to stand up and turn their backs on Howard while he was delivering his speech; an act which generated wide spread media coverage. This then fed into the already established history/culture wars, further fuelling division in the community, a polarisation in many ways created by and mediated through the media, over whether or not the Australian government as representative of all Australians should formally apologise for past injustices towards Indigenous Australians. It is largely through the context of the history/culture wars debates that this issue was sustained in the public arena, with commentators still discussing the issue some four years later (see, for example, Carney, 2002). A1.5.6 November 14, 1997: Henry Reynolds coined the phrase white blindfold. Henry Reynolds’ speech Aborigines and the 1967 referendum: Thirty years on can be seen as contributing three key elements to the history/culture wars. First, was his use of the term “white blindfold” (1998, p. 64), a term that as a result of this speech entered the common vernacular. Second, he introduced a personal and personality dimension to the debate, one that would continue to gain momentum through personal attacks between contributors to the 463

I take a very different view. I believe that the balance sheet <strong>of</strong> our history is<br />

one <strong>of</strong> heroic achievement and that we have achieved much more as a nation <strong>of</strong><br />

which we can be proud than <strong>of</strong> which we should be ashamed.<br />

In saying that, I do not exclude or ignore specific aspects <strong>of</strong> our past where we<br />

are rightly held to account. Injustices were done in Australia, and no-one should<br />

obscure or minimise them.<br />

We need to acknowledge as a nation the realities <strong>of</strong> what European settlement<br />

has meant for the first Australians, the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders, and in<br />

particular the assault on their traditions and the physical abuse they endured. (1996b,<br />

n.p., emphasis added)<br />

Combined, these speeches represent the view Howard held throughout his Prime Ministership<br />

<strong>of</strong> Australian history and how it should be remembered (although it could be argued that his<br />

perspectives gradually became even more politically conservative, with a lesser emphasis on<br />

remembering any negative aspects <strong>of</strong> Australia’s history particularly in the context <strong>of</strong> school<br />

curriculum debates). Reactions for and against these types <strong>of</strong> statements and perspectives<br />

held by Howard are examined in greater depth in the Continuation and proliferation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

history/culture wars section <strong>of</strong> this overview and demonstrate how this view pervaded public<br />

debate over the eleven years from 1996-2007. It has, therefore, been necessary to quote<br />

Howard at length here, so that an accurate portrayal <strong>of</strong> his views can be presented, enabling a<br />

strong critique <strong>of</strong> his, and other conservatives’, views on this topic with the history/culture<br />

wars.<br />

A1.5.5 May 27, 1997: Howard’s Australian Reconciliation Convention speech.<br />

The Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation, set up through an Act <strong>of</strong> Parliament from 1991 to<br />

2001, was legislated to address the following objective:<br />

The object <strong>of</strong> the establishment <strong>of</strong> the Council is to promote a process <strong>of</strong><br />

reconciliation between Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders and the wider<br />

Australian community, based on an appreciation by the Australian community as a<br />

whole <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and achievements and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

unique position <strong>of</strong> Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders as the indigenous peoples<br />

<strong>of</strong> Australia, and by means that include the fostering <strong>of</strong> an ongoing national<br />

462

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!