PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
I take a very different view. I believe that the balance sheet of our history is one of heroic achievement and that we have achieved much more as a nation of which we can be proud than of which we should be ashamed. In saying that, I do not exclude or ignore specific aspects of our past where we are rightly held to account. Injustices were done in Australia, and no-one should obscure or minimise them. We need to acknowledge as a nation the realities of what European settlement has meant for the first Australians, the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders, and in particular the assault on their traditions and the physical abuse they endured. (1996b, n.p., emphasis added) Combined, these speeches represent the view Howard held throughout his Prime Ministership of Australian history and how it should be remembered (although it could be argued that his perspectives gradually became even more politically conservative, with a lesser emphasis on remembering any negative aspects of Australia’s history particularly in the context of school curriculum debates). Reactions for and against these types of statements and perspectives held by Howard are examined in greater depth in the Continuation and proliferation of the history/culture wars section of this overview and demonstrate how this view pervaded public debate over the eleven years from 1996-2007. It has, therefore, been necessary to quote Howard at length here, so that an accurate portrayal of his views can be presented, enabling a strong critique of his, and other conservatives’, views on this topic with the history/culture wars. A1.5.5 May 27, 1997: Howard’s Australian Reconciliation Convention speech. The Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation, set up through an Act of Parliament from 1991 to 2001, was legislated to address the following objective: The object of the establishment of the Council is to promote a process of reconciliation between Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders and the wider Australian community, based on an appreciation by the Australian community as a whole of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and achievements and of the unique position of Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders as the indigenous peoples of Australia, and by means that include the fostering of an ongoing national 462
commitment to co-operate to address Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander disadvantage. (Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation Act 1991 Part 2, s. 5) In May 1997, the national council hosted the Australian Reconciliation Convention. John Howard created national attention and wide-spread controversy in the eyes of some and praise by others for his commitment to a process of practical reconciliation (as distinct from an official government apology) through offering the following opinion of Australian history in his Opening Address, ...all Australians - indigenous and otherwise - need to acknowledge realistically the interaction of our histories. Our purpose in doing so should not be to apportion blame and guilt for past wrongs, but to commit to a practical programme of action that will remove the enduring legacies of disadvantage. At the same time, we need to acknowledge openly that the treatment accorded to many indigenous Australians over a significant period of European settlement represents the most blemished chapter in our history. Clearly, there were injustices done and no-one should obscure or minimise them. (Howard, 1997, n.p.) This part of his speech, particularly the mention of injustices experienced by Indigenous Australians over an extended time period as a “blemished chapter” caused many of the delegates to stand up and turn their backs on Howard while he was delivering his speech; an act which generated wide spread media coverage. This then fed into the already established history/culture wars, further fuelling division in the community, a polarisation in many ways created by and mediated through the media, over whether or not the Australian government as representative of all Australians should formally apologise for past injustices towards Indigenous Australians. It is largely through the context of the history/culture wars debates that this issue was sustained in the public arena, with commentators still discussing the issue some four years later (see, for example, Carney, 2002). A1.5.6 November 14, 1997: Henry Reynolds coined the phrase white blindfold. Henry Reynolds’ speech Aborigines and the 1967 referendum: Thirty years on can be seen as contributing three key elements to the history/culture wars. First, was his use of the term “white blindfold” (1998, p. 64), a term that as a result of this speech entered the common vernacular. Second, he introduced a personal and personality dimension to the debate, one that would continue to gain momentum through personal attacks between contributors to the 463
- Page 426 and 427: (and at times former dominant disco
- Page 428 and 429: natives and often gave them present
- Page 430 and 431: finite and ‘true’. In particula
- Page 432 and 433: understanding? This last point is o
- Page 434 and 435: 420
- Page 436 and 437: and functional perspectives on time
- Page 438 and 439: Collins, C., & Knight, S. (2006). E
- Page 440 and 441: Department of Public Instruction. (
- Page 442 and 443: Fiske, J., Hodge, B., & Turner, G.
- Page 444 and 445: Henderson, G. (2008b, August 12). N
- Page 446 and 447: Kitson, J. (Interviewer), & Malouf,
- Page 448 and 449: Melleuish, G. (1998). The packaging
- Page 450 and 451: Roberts, M. (2004). Postmodernism a
- Page 452 and 453: van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Semiotics a
- Page 454 and 455: 440
- Page 456 and 457: 442
- Page 458 and 459: particular, this includes taking on
- Page 460 and 461: The mapping of these debates conclu
- Page 462 and 463: A1.1.4 Terminology. The term histor
- Page 464 and 465: The similarities of the debates acr
- Page 466 and 467: over...an overrun of divisive multi
- Page 468 and 469: political cartoon satirist, Peter N
- Page 470 and 471: A1.5.1 April 23, 1993: Geoffrey Bla
- Page 472 and 473: After an initial furor, this curric
- Page 474 and 475: A1.5.4 October and November 1996: J
- Page 478 and 479: history/culture wars in the public
- Page 480 and 481: parallels between ideologies presen
- Page 482 and 483: into “politically correct new age
- Page 484 and 485: Root and branch renewal of history
- Page 486 and 487: Further in his lecture, Manne then
- Page 488 and 489: Throughout the years that the histo
- Page 490 and 491: A people with a sense of a fair go
- Page 492 and 493: "There's real anger about that," ag
- Page 494 and 495: Instead, from the nation's Parliame
- Page 496 and 497: asis for critical (and often deriso
- Page 498 and 499: valid reasons for living and hoping
- Page 500 and 501: “centrally prescribed curriculum
- Page 502 and 503: elativism in school curriculum, spe
- Page 504 and 505: supporting PM Howard’s call for a
- Page 506 and 507: The politicisation of the curriculu
- Page 508 and 509: Government in the rundown to the en
- Page 510 and 511: oversimplified and shallow analysis
- Page 512 and 513: than the combination of history, ge
- Page 514 and 515: Language used by opponents of the c
- Page 516 and 517: invades school curriculum” (Lane,
- Page 518 and 519: 504
- Page 520 and 521: 506
- Page 522 and 523: Appendix D: Sample Data Analyses Ti
- Page 524 and 525: (p. 110) Passage 6: (pp. 110-111) P
I take a very different view. I believe that the balance sheet <strong>of</strong> our history is<br />
one <strong>of</strong> heroic achievement and that we have achieved much more as a nation <strong>of</strong><br />
which we can be proud than <strong>of</strong> which we should be ashamed.<br />
In saying that, I do not exclude or ignore specific aspects <strong>of</strong> our past where we<br />
are rightly held to account. Injustices were done in Australia, and no-one should<br />
obscure or minimise them.<br />
We need to acknowledge as a nation the realities <strong>of</strong> what European settlement<br />
has meant for the first Australians, the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders, and in<br />
particular the assault on their traditions and the physical abuse they endured. (1996b,<br />
n.p., emphasis added)<br />
Combined, these speeches represent the view Howard held throughout his Prime Ministership<br />
<strong>of</strong> Australian history and how it should be remembered (although it could be argued that his<br />
perspectives gradually became even more politically conservative, with a lesser emphasis on<br />
remembering any negative aspects <strong>of</strong> Australia’s history particularly in the context <strong>of</strong> school<br />
curriculum debates). Reactions for and against these types <strong>of</strong> statements and perspectives<br />
held by Howard are examined in greater depth in the Continuation and proliferation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
history/culture wars section <strong>of</strong> this overview and demonstrate how this view pervaded public<br />
debate over the eleven years from 1996-2007. It has, therefore, been necessary to quote<br />
Howard at length here, so that an accurate portrayal <strong>of</strong> his views can be presented, enabling a<br />
strong critique <strong>of</strong> his, and other conservatives’, views on this topic with the history/culture<br />
wars.<br />
A1.5.5 May 27, 1997: Howard’s Australian Reconciliation Convention speech.<br />
The Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation, set up through an Act <strong>of</strong> Parliament from 1991 to<br />
2001, was legislated to address the following objective:<br />
The object <strong>of</strong> the establishment <strong>of</strong> the Council is to promote a process <strong>of</strong><br />
reconciliation between Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders and the wider<br />
Australian community, based on an appreciation by the Australian community as a<br />
whole <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and achievements and <strong>of</strong> the<br />
unique position <strong>of</strong> Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders as the indigenous peoples<br />
<strong>of</strong> Australia, and by means that include the fostering <strong>of</strong> an ongoing national<br />
462