11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

After an initial furor, this curriculum issue remained dormant for the next thirteen years,<br />

emerging again in early 2007 during debates about instituting a national curriculum <strong>of</strong> which<br />

then-Opposition Leader Kevin Rudd supported (Editorial: The advantages <strong>of</strong> a national<br />

approach, 2007). It re-emerged again in late 2007 after Rudd became Prime Minister and<br />

speculation mounted about an Apology to Indigenous Australians for the Government’s<br />

policy on removing children from their homes (N. Pearson, 2007). Reports recollected that<br />

Rudd demonstrated a conservative view <strong>of</strong> Australian history in school curriculum, working<br />

to replace the word “invasion” with other such as “colonisation” and “settlement.” Ferrari and<br />

Wilson reported <strong>of</strong> the 1994 issue:<br />

The resource for teachers said terms such as settlement, explorer or pioneer were not<br />

acceptable and the preferred term was invasion. After intervention by then premier<br />

Wayne Goss, the cabinet <strong>of</strong>fice, <strong>of</strong> which Mr Rudd was then head, produced a<br />

replacement book, which said many Aborigines interpreted the First Fleet's arrival as<br />

invasion but "colonisation" or "settlement" also accurately described the same event.<br />

(2007, para. 10, emphasis added)<br />

This one-topic issue is an example <strong>of</strong> the cross over that can occur between school-based<br />

issues and the history/culture wars, with the topic gaining widespread interest both in 1994<br />

when it was first reported and then in 2007 when it resurfaced. Whereas in 1994 it was used<br />

as an example to make a point about alleged school curriculum ‘bias’ on a single State<br />

platform, in 2007 this was extended and used as an example to mount a case for the national<br />

curriculum to be implemented, with The Australian newspaper arguing “giving the federal<br />

government central control <strong>of</strong> the nation's curriculum would also serve to increase<br />

accountability and transparency in a system that is too <strong>of</strong>ten deliberately opaque and<br />

unfriendly when it comes to involving parents” (Editorial: The advantages <strong>of</strong> a national<br />

approach, 2007, para. 1).<br />

A1.5.3 November 30, 1994: Civics Expert Group report, Whereas the People:<br />

Civics and Citizenship Education.<br />

Written by the Civics Expert Group established by the Keating government in the early<br />

1990s, and chaired by Stuart MacIntyre the report, Whereas the people: Civics and<br />

citizenship education (Civics Expert Group, 1994) took stock <strong>of</strong> existing citizenship and<br />

civics curriculum and made several key recommendations to foster the improvement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

citizenship and civics teaching across Australia. Unusual for any issue related to social<br />

458

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!