11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The mapping <strong>of</strong> these debates concludes with the defeat <strong>of</strong> Prime Minister John Howard at<br />

the November 24, 2007 Federal Election, a date that arguably spelled the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

history/culture wars (at least in the form they had taken up until that point). During his prime<br />

ministership, John Howard was instrumental in continuing the history/culture war debates,<br />

being an ardent conservative and high pr<strong>of</strong>ile supporter <strong>of</strong> Blainey. Howard holds a view <strong>of</strong><br />

Australian history that seeks to celebrate Australian progressive historical milestones and to<br />

marginalise aspects <strong>of</strong> the nation’s history that seek to pr<strong>of</strong>ile negative or collective shameful<br />

aspects. This approach to history and public memory-making has become known as “the<br />

Three Cheers view” (Blainey, 2005, p. 30). Its direct binary is the Black Armband view, an<br />

approach that considers only negative aspects <strong>of</strong> Australia’s past, especially in relation to<br />

Indigenous Australian histories. With the 2007 defeat <strong>of</strong> John Howard after 11 years as Prime<br />

Minister, the newly-elected Prime Minister Kevin Rudd did not contribute to the debates<br />

surrounding this topic, instead choosing to (generally) avoid making statements about and<br />

responding to questions regarding the history/culture wars. By framing the history/culture<br />

wars in a specific timeframe, this project seeks to provide a mapping <strong>of</strong> the significant<br />

junctures <strong>of</strong> the debates as they occurred at that time.<br />

There is a multitude <strong>of</strong> published texts adding new perspectives or providing in depth<br />

analyses covering the history/culture wars (see, for example, Melleuish, 1997; MacIntyre and<br />

Clark, 2003; Manne, 2003, 2004; Blainey, 2005; H. Reynolds, 1998, 2001; Windschuttle,<br />

1996, 2004; Donnelly, 2007a; Parkes, 2007; and A. Clark, 2002a, 2002b). Given the myriad<br />

<strong>of</strong> information already available, the main arguments having already entered the general<br />

public domain, the intent <strong>of</strong> this overview is not to replicate these debates. Nor is the<br />

intention here to provide an in-depth analysis <strong>of</strong> the many political perspectives which have<br />

influenced this debate on a number <strong>of</strong> levels. Instead, this overview provides a general<br />

overview and explanation <strong>of</strong> the history/culture wars that have been occurring on a national<br />

level in Australia between historians, educators, governments, journalists and media<br />

commentators since the early 1990s. How the major shifts <strong>of</strong> the debate intersect with school<br />

curriculum is the primary matter <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />

A1.1.3 Transnational contexts.<br />

Ongoing public debates significant for creating shifts in understanding and facilitating deep<br />

thinking about the perspective on and selection <strong>of</strong> events in national and cultural histories are<br />

carried out across a number <strong>of</strong> nations. For example, nations such as the United States <strong>of</strong><br />

446

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!