11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

do meet this description, however for this era the textbook content and style deployed were<br />

quite interesting. It seems an effort was made by the Departmental curriculum writers to<br />

engage and sustain the interest <strong>of</strong> school students. Through informal conversations held with<br />

adults who used these textbooks as school students in the 1960s and 1970s I have learnt that<br />

they remember quite fondly these textbooks as pedagogical devices and can also remember<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the narratives—demonstrating the long lasting impact curriculum has on students<br />

post-schooling.<br />

8.3.3 1988 Bicentennial era.<br />

This era presents a largely contradictory curriculum approach. Although with a surface look it<br />

is couched within a seemingly progressivist view, that is one that presents “curriculum as<br />

open process... [and]... curriculum relevant to contemporary issues” (Gilbert, 2003, pp. 6-7).<br />

However, an argument against categorising it in this way is that overall, and in many<br />

examples from primary and high school year levels, it is not progressivist, nor inquiry, in a<br />

way that encourages students to adopt perspectives that may differ from those <strong>of</strong> the textbook<br />

authors. Instead, students are directed, through skilful manoeuvre and selection <strong>of</strong> primary<br />

source documents to arrive at distinct, predetermined conclusions. Whereas students may be<br />

encouraged to engage in discussion and ask questions, there is a clear direction that they are<br />

guided to take, epitomised by the primary source documents that are available in the<br />

sourcebooks and textbooks. This is evident, for example, in Case studies in Australian history<br />

(Stewart, 1986). Here, a conservative Prime Minister (McMahon) is criticised for his<br />

handling <strong>of</strong> the issue; whereas the Labor Prime Minister (Whitlam) that followed him was<br />

praised for his dealing with the issue despite backing away from his election promise <strong>of</strong><br />

granting land rights to Indigenous Australians. In addition, primary source perspectives other<br />

than those <strong>of</strong> the Gurindji tribe and their sympathisers, such as the landholder and the<br />

government are excluded; resulting in a one sided view <strong>of</strong> the issue presented to students.<br />

Exchanging one overarching view for another, applies to the curriculum approach taken, a<br />

point made by Gilbert: “To promote participation in the system as if it was open and fair<br />

would be to disguise injustice, not much better than the indoctrination <strong>of</strong> Queen and Country<br />

<strong>of</strong> earlier times. It would also betray the less powerful...by neglecting the need to make the<br />

system more open” (2004, p. 12).<br />

Aspects <strong>of</strong> traditional approaches are also evident through the teacher information sheets and<br />

pupil information sheets from the Social Studies sourcebooks. With knowledge presented as<br />

415

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!