PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

textbooks are...a very important vehicle for shaping their [students’] understanding of the world, not least because they perceive that textbooks represent the ‘official’ point of view of grown-ups” (2006, p. ix). Even if students themselves do not use specific textbooks regularly, often teachers draw teaching material from them resulting in the widespread use and endorsement of the content contained within textbooks (see, for example, Gray’s note to teachers in the preface of Essentials of history). Issitt identifies some of the negative connotations associated with the term ‘textbook’, but also states that even with the negativity they attract, textbooks “as a teaching aid and as part of the learning experience, they are practically ubiquitous…on the one hand textbooks are derided, but…the reality of their universal use cannot be denied” (2004, p. 683). Issitt further explains that textbooks can be seen as the internal underpinnings of a particular subject area and that the textbooks “function to create, trace and maintain the boundaries of a discipline by inclusion or exclusion of subjects and by expressing a disciplinary discourse that lays claims to a particular terrain of ideas” (p. 688). Luke, de Castell and Luke emphasise the importance of textbooks as a pedagogical tool, writing: The significant role of textbooks in education...is a function of their ability to ‘make meanings more explicit’ in a manner which places those meanings ‘above criticism’...Since schooling aims to transmit...‘culturally significant knowledge’...textbooks are an ideal format. (1989, p. 246) The importance of textbooks cannot be ignored, in terms of shaping and informing the official knowledge of the school curriculum (see Apple, 1988 for an early discussion regarding economics and textbooks), with Gilbert stating: “...textbooks are an important...factor influencing the questions, issues and topics discussed in classrooms. In influencing the agendas of classroom discussion they are important discursive frameworks” (1989, p. 70). Furthermore, Davis writes: Textbooks derive their power not from their ubiquitous presence in classrooms. If they did although they do not, chalkboards and pencils and paper would share textbooks’ potency. Textbooks are powerful not because of the nature of the texts that they include. Simply, textbooks are powerful because they contain the information that society expects students to know...As Michael Apple has so aptly noted, the knowledge in almost all textbooks, however written, compiled and published, properly may be classified as “official knowledge”. (2006, p. xiii) 28

The study and analysis of textbooks is an area that can become more difficult when the textbook examined is a recent publication. This is due to the theory that there are “unexamined assumptions” (Pinsent, 1997, p. 2) on the behalf of authors; and perhaps also the teachers who select the textbooks for use. Issitt asserts that a textbook, for example published in the late 19 th or early 20 th century can be a simpler exercise to deconstruct in order to identify discourses operating within, as it is easier to be retrospective about ideologies evident in the content of textbooks than to accurately consider the textbooks of our own times. Issitt writes, “our vision tends to become more obscured as we approach the contemporary mindset and as we confusedly try to unpack the world with intellectual tools, some of which bear little resemblance to the philosophical perspectives informing its construction” (2004, p. 690). This idea is endorsed by Althusser who explains that contemporary texts “...are so integrated into our everyday ‘consciousness’ that it is extremely hard, not to say almost impossible, to raise oneself to the point of view of reproduction” (1971, p. 123). This project avoids this by analysing textbooks from previous eras and by establishing and adhering to a rigorous process of analysis, enabling findings to emerge from the data, as set out in Chapter 3: Methodology, Research Design and Conduct. 2.3.2 Maintaining (ideological) dominance through textbook content. Textbooks generally present themselves as ideologically neutral; an idea of schooling which is supported by those who make statements such as “keep ideology out of school” (Akerman, 2008, n.p.). This type of statement ignores that, as this project establishes, “…no use of language is ideologically neutral, that every text, from a political tract to a tram ticket, is expressive of a particular discourse, and bears evidence of some hegemonic intent” (Widdowson, 1998, p. 146). This notion of hegemony is further explored in Chapter 3: Methodology, Research Design and Conduct. Regarding the role textbooks play in legitimizing dominant perspectives, Issitt writes: Textbooks as a teaching vehicle are legitimized in the business of education by the assumption of political neutrality. Subjected to close scrutiny, however, their status as ideologically neutral is rarely sustainable and their apolitical veneer easily stripped off. The most obvious way to expose the political dimension of their knowledge status is to think of where they are generally used—in that culturally sanctioned site of human engagement, the classroom. It does not take long to show that not only is this important site of learning policed by professionals and educational policies to 29

textbooks are...a very important vehicle for shaping their [students’] understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world, not least because they perceive that textbooks represent the ‘<strong>of</strong>ficial’ point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong><br />

grown-ups” (2006, p. ix). Even if students themselves do not use specific textbooks regularly,<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten teachers draw teaching material from them resulting in the widespread use and<br />

endorsement <strong>of</strong> the content contained within textbooks (see, for example, Gray’s note to<br />

teachers in the preface <strong>of</strong> Essentials <strong>of</strong> history). Issitt identifies some <strong>of</strong> the negative<br />

connotations associated with the term ‘textbook’, but also states that even with the negativity<br />

they attract, textbooks “as a teaching aid and as part <strong>of</strong> the learning experience, they are<br />

practically ubiquitous…on the one hand textbooks are derided, but…the reality <strong>of</strong> their<br />

universal use cannot be denied” (2004, p. 683). Issitt further explains that textbooks can be<br />

seen as the internal underpinnings <strong>of</strong> a particular subject area and that the textbooks “function<br />

to create, trace and maintain the boundaries <strong>of</strong> a discipline by inclusion or exclusion <strong>of</strong><br />

subjects and by expressing a disciplinary discourse that lays claims to a particular terrain <strong>of</strong><br />

ideas” (p. 688). Luke, de Castell and Luke emphasise the importance <strong>of</strong> textbooks as a<br />

pedagogical tool, writing:<br />

The significant role <strong>of</strong> textbooks in education...is a function <strong>of</strong> their ability to ‘make<br />

meanings more explicit’ in a manner which places those meanings ‘above<br />

criticism’...Since schooling aims to transmit...‘culturally significant<br />

knowledge’...textbooks are an ideal format. (1989, p. 246)<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> textbooks cannot be ignored, in terms <strong>of</strong> shaping and informing the<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial knowledge <strong>of</strong> the school curriculum (see Apple, 1988 for an early discussion<br />

regarding economics and textbooks), with Gilbert stating: “...textbooks are an<br />

important...factor influencing the questions, issues and topics discussed in classrooms. In<br />

influencing the agendas <strong>of</strong> classroom discussion they are important discursive frameworks”<br />

(1989, p. 70). Furthermore, Davis writes:<br />

Textbooks derive their power not from their ubiquitous presence in classrooms.<br />

If they did although they do not, chalkboards and pencils and paper would<br />

share textbooks’ potency. Textbooks are powerful not because <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

texts that they include. Simply, textbooks are powerful because they contain the<br />

information that society expects students to know...As Michael Apple has so aptly<br />

noted, the knowledge in almost all textbooks, however written, compiled and<br />

published, properly may be classified as “<strong>of</strong>ficial knowledge”. (2006, p. xiii)<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!