11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.23.6 Representations <strong>of</strong> British heritages.<br />

As discussed throughout the analysis, there is an obvious absence <strong>of</strong> British heritages<br />

represented in national history, even when topics are included that lend themselves to have<br />

British heritages extensively included. More <strong>of</strong>ten, British heritages are included significantly<br />

disjointed from the main point <strong>of</strong> the given historical narrative, included as random anecdotes<br />

or footnotes to history narratives, rather than an important component <strong>of</strong> events. Instead <strong>of</strong><br />

discussing any British roots or framework in modern Australia, history is very much<br />

presented as only ‘Australian’ without the influence <strong>of</strong> Great Britain in the past or present.<br />

Two representations <strong>of</strong> British heritages in particular emerge from the analysis <strong>of</strong> this era,<br />

prominent in school curriculum across grade levels. First, British representations are<br />

significantly absent and sometimes omitted from Australian history. Second, is that these<br />

representations are <strong>of</strong>ten included in content, for example The Treaty <strong>of</strong> Versailles and post<br />

WWII policies, as a way to point out the increasing dissociation <strong>of</strong> Australia from the former<br />

colonial power. Unlike Indigenous representations, examples <strong>of</strong> British heritages in textbooks<br />

do not speak so much <strong>of</strong> a British culture or the actions and attitudes <strong>of</strong> British people and<br />

groups. Instead, a global view <strong>of</strong> British heritages is evident that presents British systems and<br />

processes, such as for example, Australia’s parliamentary system influenced by Great Britain.<br />

The inclusion <strong>of</strong> British heritages in Australian national history is legitimised by featuring<br />

Great Britain as the leader <strong>of</strong> systems, processes and institutions (for example, parliamentary<br />

systems, governance and military power), with Australia copying parts <strong>of</strong> these and greatly<br />

influenced by the once-imperial power. In early 20 th century history, this is viewed through<br />

an ideology <strong>of</strong> British superiority, with Australia following or complying with Great Britain.<br />

However, there is a marked shift in this—especially evident through the narrative in the<br />

textbook The modern world emerges (Lawrence et al., 1986)—whereby Australia ceases to<br />

position Great Britain as a superior nation or empire and makes decisions independent from,<br />

and not always aligned with the views <strong>of</strong> Great Britain. It is as though in celebrating the 1988<br />

Bicentennial, Australia is attempting to establish a distinct ‘Australian’ identity through<br />

selective history narratives, at the expense <strong>of</strong> British influence and participation, with<br />

discourses <strong>of</strong> multiculturalism replacing British heritages.<br />

To conclude, analysis <strong>of</strong> textbooks and other school curriculum documents for this era<br />

demonstrate that discourses <strong>of</strong> celebration related to the exemplar topics, British heritages<br />

404

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!