PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
explains the purpose of including Teacher information sheets read: “It is recommended that teachers work through the in-service component of these materials before using the sourcebook activities with their classes” (Department of Education, 1988a, p. 1); and “where specific information is needed to complete an activity, teacher information, pupil information or pupil activities sheets have been included” (Department of Education, 1988a, p. 5). By providing Teacher information sheets, it acknowledges that primary teachers, who generally do not specialise in a curriculum area, need support, being unreasonable to expect that they would have deep knowledge about all topics covered in the curriculum. By providing a summary of the research related to key topics addressed in the syllabus, teachers are able to access background information they can use to inform their teaching. Teacher autonomy is then encouraged by suggesting teachers to exercise their discretion in summarising the Teacher information sheets to construct into student worksheets, through the following statement: Discuss with children some of the views of Aboriginal habitation of Australia as presented in the teacher information sheets. Children should not be given copies of the information sheets, although teachers may wish to compile a brief summary of relevant points for pupil use (Department of Education, 1988a, p. 17, emphasis added). 7.23.3 Narrative style of school curriculum. Unlike the primary school Social Studies curriculum of the previous eras analysed, during the lead up to the 1988 Bicentennial era, the curriculum lacks a similar type of vitality and storymaking, and instead presents as very boring. Gone are the personalities of history that could potentially really engage students and in its place is a Social Studies curriculum that is presented as ‘factual’ and almost encyclopaedia-like that it would require high levels of pedagogical creativity on the classroom teacher’s part to create an interesting curriculum. In particular, for a year 5 student, national history is presented in such an unimaginative way with a focus on civics and citizenship rather than history, that unless the teacher was either a) an expert or had a deep interest in History or b) was aware of Social Science pedagogies, this curriculum presents as exceptionally tiresome and boring; especially when compared with the narrative style of the curriculum in the two previous eras analysed. In the example provided at Source 7.95, although Sir Henry Parkes is mentioned, there is no background information provided of this exciting statesman nor the personalities involved in the vibrant debates that were held in the few decades leading up to Australia’s Federation in 1901. This reads more 398
like a review sheet, yet it is not. It is suggested to students as the only resource for the topic “The story of Federation” (Department of Education, 1988a, p.114). Although one of the most important events of Australia’s developing nationhood, it is treated with such brevity, presented as an unimportant period in Australia’s history as though there is no need for students to have any sustained engagement with this topic. The curriculum appears to be so concerned with presenting itself as ‘factual’ and ‘impartial’ that to have curriculum materials that are explicitly ‘voiced’ would be to not present an accurate or valid history. However, it is argued here that being devoid of character does not in itself make a curriculum any more, or any less, historically accurate. 399
- Page 362 and 363: Source 7.53. Continuity of Indigeno
- Page 364 and 365: in conjunction with non-Indigenous
- Page 366 and 367: Source 7.57. Activity ideas for Nat
- Page 368 and 369: Unit 3: Modern Australia emerges co
- Page 370 and 371: demonstrate, even at a minor and in
- Page 372 and 373: students are exposed to no aspects
- Page 374 and 375: first Australians and I’m an Aust
- Page 376 and 377: eing taught until the upper primary
- Page 378 and 379: which details the setting up of a c
- Page 380 and 381: 7.67. Two examples in particular sh
- Page 382 and 383: unlike other textbooks which discus
- Page 384 and 385: However, although this statement wa
- Page 386 and 387: fear of Japan, that the Australian
- Page 388 and 389: Australia in both WWI and WWII. The
- Page 390 and 391: Source 7.73. Treaty of Versailles e
- Page 392 and 393: The Australian government realized
- Page 394 and 395: Task 41: Australian foreign policy
- Page 396 and 397: enemy threatening to invade our sho
- Page 398 and 399: following statement: “Political l
- Page 400 and 401: “doomed to failure”; “finally
- Page 402 and 403: So strong are the stories of the Ga
- Page 404 and 405: Moving beyond a simplistic discours
- Page 406 and 407: Nationalists, opposed to the Britis
- Page 408 and 409: This demonstrates the importance Gr
- Page 410 and 411: entered mainstream public conscious
- Page 414 and 415: Source 7.95. “Pupil information s
- Page 416 and 417: terminology of European is stated w
- Page 418 and 419: 7.23.6 Representations of British h
- Page 420 and 421: 406
- Page 422 and 423: findings of the analysis through ar
- Page 424 and 425: curriculum in such a way that the h
- Page 426 and 427: (and at times former dominant disco
- Page 428 and 429: natives and often gave them present
- Page 430 and 431: finite and ‘true’. In particula
- Page 432 and 433: understanding? This last point is o
- Page 434 and 435: 420
- Page 436 and 437: and functional perspectives on time
- Page 438 and 439: Collins, C., & Knight, S. (2006). E
- Page 440 and 441: Department of Public Instruction. (
- Page 442 and 443: Fiske, J., Hodge, B., & Turner, G.
- Page 444 and 445: Henderson, G. (2008b, August 12). N
- Page 446 and 447: Kitson, J. (Interviewer), & Malouf,
- Page 448 and 449: Melleuish, G. (1998). The packaging
- Page 450 and 451: Roberts, M. (2004). Postmodernism a
- Page 452 and 453: van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Semiotics a
- Page 454 and 455: 440
- Page 456 and 457: 442
- Page 458 and 459: particular, this includes taking on
- Page 460 and 461: The mapping of these debates conclu
explains the purpose <strong>of</strong> including Teacher information sheets read: “It is recommended that<br />
teachers work through the in-service component <strong>of</strong> these materials before using the<br />
sourcebook activities with their classes” (Department <strong>of</strong> Education, 1988a, p. 1); and “where<br />
specific information is needed to complete an activity, teacher information, pupil information<br />
or pupil activities sheets have been included” (Department <strong>of</strong> Education, 1988a, p. 5). By<br />
providing Teacher information sheets, it acknowledges that primary teachers, who generally<br />
do not specialise in a curriculum area, need support, being unreasonable to expect that they<br />
would have deep knowledge about all topics covered in the curriculum. By providing a<br />
summary <strong>of</strong> the research related to key topics addressed in the syllabus, teachers are able to<br />
access background information they can use to inform their teaching. Teacher autonomy is<br />
then encouraged by suggesting teachers to exercise their discretion in summarising the<br />
Teacher information sheets to construct into student worksheets, through the following<br />
statement:<br />
Discuss with children some <strong>of</strong> the views <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal habitation <strong>of</strong> Australia as<br />
presented in the teacher information sheets. Children should not be given copies <strong>of</strong><br />
the information sheets, although teachers may wish to compile a brief summary <strong>of</strong><br />
relevant points for pupil use (Department <strong>of</strong> Education, 1988a, p. 17, emphasis<br />
added).<br />
7.23.3 Narrative style <strong>of</strong> school curriculum.<br />
Unlike the primary school Social Studies curriculum <strong>of</strong> the previous eras analysed, during the<br />
lead up to the 1988 Bicentennial era, the curriculum lacks a similar type <strong>of</strong> vitality and storymaking,<br />
and instead presents as very boring. Gone are the personalities <strong>of</strong> history that could<br />
potentially really engage students and in its place is a Social Studies curriculum that is<br />
presented as ‘factual’ and almost encyclopaedia-like that it would require high levels <strong>of</strong><br />
pedagogical creativity on the classroom teacher’s part to create an interesting curriculum. In<br />
particular, for a year 5 student, national history is presented in such an unimaginative way<br />
with a focus on civics and citizenship rather than history, that unless the teacher was either a)<br />
an expert or had a deep interest in History or b) was aware <strong>of</strong> Social Science pedagogies, this<br />
curriculum presents as exceptionally tiresome and boring; especially when compared with the<br />
narrative style <strong>of</strong> the curriculum in the two previous eras analysed. In the example provided<br />
at Source 7.95, although Sir Henry Parkes is mentioned, there is no background information<br />
provided <strong>of</strong> this exciting statesman nor the personalities involved in the vibrant debates that<br />
were held in the few decades leading up to Australia’s Federation in 1901. This reads more<br />
398