PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

explains the purpose of including Teacher information sheets read: “It is recommended that teachers work through the in-service component of these materials before using the sourcebook activities with their classes” (Department of Education, 1988a, p. 1); and “where specific information is needed to complete an activity, teacher information, pupil information or pupil activities sheets have been included” (Department of Education, 1988a, p. 5). By providing Teacher information sheets, it acknowledges that primary teachers, who generally do not specialise in a curriculum area, need support, being unreasonable to expect that they would have deep knowledge about all topics covered in the curriculum. By providing a summary of the research related to key topics addressed in the syllabus, teachers are able to access background information they can use to inform their teaching. Teacher autonomy is then encouraged by suggesting teachers to exercise their discretion in summarising the Teacher information sheets to construct into student worksheets, through the following statement: Discuss with children some of the views of Aboriginal habitation of Australia as presented in the teacher information sheets. Children should not be given copies of the information sheets, although teachers may wish to compile a brief summary of relevant points for pupil use (Department of Education, 1988a, p. 17, emphasis added). 7.23.3 Narrative style of school curriculum. Unlike the primary school Social Studies curriculum of the previous eras analysed, during the lead up to the 1988 Bicentennial era, the curriculum lacks a similar type of vitality and storymaking, and instead presents as very boring. Gone are the personalities of history that could potentially really engage students and in its place is a Social Studies curriculum that is presented as ‘factual’ and almost encyclopaedia-like that it would require high levels of pedagogical creativity on the classroom teacher’s part to create an interesting curriculum. In particular, for a year 5 student, national history is presented in such an unimaginative way with a focus on civics and citizenship rather than history, that unless the teacher was either a) an expert or had a deep interest in History or b) was aware of Social Science pedagogies, this curriculum presents as exceptionally tiresome and boring; especially when compared with the narrative style of the curriculum in the two previous eras analysed. In the example provided at Source 7.95, although Sir Henry Parkes is mentioned, there is no background information provided of this exciting statesman nor the personalities involved in the vibrant debates that were held in the few decades leading up to Australia’s Federation in 1901. This reads more 398

like a review sheet, yet it is not. It is suggested to students as the only resource for the topic “The story of Federation” (Department of Education, 1988a, p.114). Although one of the most important events of Australia’s developing nationhood, it is treated with such brevity, presented as an unimportant period in Australia’s history as though there is no need for students to have any sustained engagement with this topic. The curriculum appears to be so concerned with presenting itself as ‘factual’ and ‘impartial’ that to have curriculum materials that are explicitly ‘voiced’ would be to not present an accurate or valid history. However, it is argued here that being devoid of character does not in itself make a curriculum any more, or any less, historically accurate. 399

explains the purpose <strong>of</strong> including Teacher information sheets read: “It is recommended that<br />

teachers work through the in-service component <strong>of</strong> these materials before using the<br />

sourcebook activities with their classes” (Department <strong>of</strong> Education, 1988a, p. 1); and “where<br />

specific information is needed to complete an activity, teacher information, pupil information<br />

or pupil activities sheets have been included” (Department <strong>of</strong> Education, 1988a, p. 5). By<br />

providing Teacher information sheets, it acknowledges that primary teachers, who generally<br />

do not specialise in a curriculum area, need support, being unreasonable to expect that they<br />

would have deep knowledge about all topics covered in the curriculum. By providing a<br />

summary <strong>of</strong> the research related to key topics addressed in the syllabus, teachers are able to<br />

access background information they can use to inform their teaching. Teacher autonomy is<br />

then encouraged by suggesting teachers to exercise their discretion in summarising the<br />

Teacher information sheets to construct into student worksheets, through the following<br />

statement:<br />

Discuss with children some <strong>of</strong> the views <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal habitation <strong>of</strong> Australia as<br />

presented in the teacher information sheets. Children should not be given copies <strong>of</strong><br />

the information sheets, although teachers may wish to compile a brief summary <strong>of</strong><br />

relevant points for pupil use (Department <strong>of</strong> Education, 1988a, p. 17, emphasis<br />

added).<br />

7.23.3 Narrative style <strong>of</strong> school curriculum.<br />

Unlike the primary school Social Studies curriculum <strong>of</strong> the previous eras analysed, during the<br />

lead up to the 1988 Bicentennial era, the curriculum lacks a similar type <strong>of</strong> vitality and storymaking,<br />

and instead presents as very boring. Gone are the personalities <strong>of</strong> history that could<br />

potentially really engage students and in its place is a Social Studies curriculum that is<br />

presented as ‘factual’ and almost encyclopaedia-like that it would require high levels <strong>of</strong><br />

pedagogical creativity on the classroom teacher’s part to create an interesting curriculum. In<br />

particular, for a year 5 student, national history is presented in such an unimaginative way<br />

with a focus on civics and citizenship rather than history, that unless the teacher was either a)<br />

an expert or had a deep interest in History or b) was aware <strong>of</strong> Social Science pedagogies, this<br />

curriculum presents as exceptionally tiresome and boring; especially when compared with the<br />

narrative style <strong>of</strong> the curriculum in the two previous eras analysed. In the example provided<br />

at Source 7.95, although Sir Henry Parkes is mentioned, there is no background information<br />

provided <strong>of</strong> this exciting statesman nor the personalities involved in the vibrant debates that<br />

were held in the few decades leading up to Australia’s Federation in 1901. This reads more<br />

398

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!