PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
2.3 Defining Textbooks One important way official knowledge of school curriculum is communicated in classrooms is through the use of textbooks. In discussing how official knowledge is constructed, Luke raises the point of the influence and impact particular constructions have, and how this is influenced by “…curriculum texts prepared by academics and teachers, and corporate publishers…” (1995-1996, p. 28). Textbooks are written from the perspective that the content contained within them is “what counts as knowledge…and, by default, alternative claims on the same knowledge arena or alternative lines of exploration are cast as irrelevant” (Issitt, 2004, p. 689). Traditionally in Queensland textbooks have been written by school teachers, Queensland-based academics (usually former classroom teachers, such as H.R. Cowie), school and district inspectors, or compiled by anonymous Department of Education/Public Instruction public servants (especially in the case of Queensland Readers). In more recent times, there has been an increase in the education market of textbooks published by non- Queensland authors. This is arguably a result of the increasing nationalisation of curriculum that can be traced from about the mid-1990s onwards, with the advent of closer curriculum ties between Australian states, through the 1989 Hobart Declaration of Schooling and the updated 1999 Adelaide Declaration on National Goals of Schooling in the Twenty-first Century (as detailed in Appendix A: Contexts). For the purposes of this project, the authorship of textbooks remains with the former usual practices as the period of analysis ceases in 1988. Additionally, textbooks published for Queensland schools closely follow the requirements of each school year level as outlined in the relevant syllabus. For the Queensland context, how the curriculum is realised through History textbooks including their publication is detailed in greater depth in Chapter 4: Data Analysis Introduction. Whilst there are many different ways to categorise and define exactly which types of written academic texts should be catalogued as textbooks, as explored by Issitt (2004), for the purposes of this dissertation, undertaking such a task is irrelevant. Instead, the textbooks selected for analysis are those that are marketed as being textbooks by publishing companies, such as Jacaranda and William Brooks, and those published by relevant Queensland government departments, The Department of Public Instruction later to become The Department of Education. They are automatically considered textbooks due to the purpose of their publication (selection criteria for specific textbooks used for analysis is outlined in Chapter 3: Methodology, Research Design and Conduct). It is, however useful to look at the 26
way textbooks are defined by their genre, and one offered by Hoskin states, “…two driving principles that distinguish books as a form of textuality: normalization and expansionism. Textbooks as a genre are driven by normalization, as they shape their message according to normalizing constraints” (1990, p. 2). The normalising processes that take place through their use will be explored in depth during the data analysis stages. Building on the statements of textbooks purposes, Hamilton considers that “…textbooks visibly reflect pedagogic considerations. That is, a textbook is not just a book used in schools. Rather, it is a book that has been consciously designed and organised to serve…schooling” (1990, p. 1). By and large, textbooks structure content and treat the reader (in this case, school students) as “textual subjects” rather than “agents” (Pink, 2001, p. 5), promoting a passive, accepting reading of the knowledge, as opposed to active engagement and critiquing of the information presented. This then influences the style of writing and structure of textbooks as generally passive and authoritative, and as Giroux claims a “...‘reified view of knowledge’, meaning a form of knowledge that is beyond question, that erases the fact that it was produced by humans operating in a particular context with a specific set of values” (as cited in Steinberg & Kincheloe, 1998, p. 5). Regarding the tone of textbooks, Issitt writes: In general, the particular voice of the textbooks author is subsumed within a monotone of expositionary clarity. It is this authorial monotone that underlines the claim to objectivity and political neutrality inherent in textbooks. In removing, or possibly camouflaging the author’s particularities and personal agendas, the textbook fits the genre and invites a learning engagement already ring-fenced by cultural markers and rules. (2004, p. 688). To what degree this is reflected in the textbooks selected for this project is analysed and included for discussion in each of the data analysis chapters. 2.3.1 Use and importance of textbooks. Textbooks are often viewed in a negative light, with many people perceiving them to be difficult to comprehend, boring and presented as an uninteresting way to learn (see, for example, Osborne’s, 2003 study of Canadian History curriculum). However, as they are used extensively in schools, particularly in secondary teaching, they are therefore important to consider when discussing what constitutes the official knowledge present in the school curriculum. As John Daniel, former Assistant General Director, UNESCO writes: “...school 27
- Page 1: University of Southern Queensland C
- Page 5: Certification of Dissertation I cer
- Page 8 and 9: for and receive a scholarship so th
- Page 10 and 11: 5.4 Category 1: Privileging British
- Page 12 and 13: List of Figures Figure 3.1 Structur
- Page 14 and 15: Appendices Appendix A: Contexts…
- Page 16 and 17: through The Courier Mail, as well a
- Page 18 and 19: A syllabus in the Queensland school
- Page 20 and 21: after World War I (WWI); the Austra
- Page 22 and 23: Settler and Savage: One hundred yea
- Page 24 and 25: 3. What discourses of British Herit
- Page 26 and 27: Howard in 2007; arguably a point in
- Page 28 and 29: 2.1.2 Key concepts and terms. As wi
- Page 30 and 31: Giroux & Purpel, 1983; Whitty, 1985
- Page 32 and 33: that Bruner mentions are prepositio
- Page 34 and 35: kind of private property handed dow
- Page 36 and 37: The information presented thus far
- Page 38 and 39: English (AATE) used an editorial of
- Page 42 and 43: textbooks are...a very important ve
- Page 44 and 45: which the learner is subject, but t
- Page 46 and 47: Although Issitt (2004) contends tha
- Page 48 and 49: intended set of learnings are infor
- Page 50 and 51: Moving to focus on those who hold r
- Page 52 and 53: parameters of the terms of the deba
- Page 54 and 55: Similarly, Woodfin asserts “in es
- Page 56 and 57: 1996, pp. 8-9). Luke further discus
- Page 58 and 59: powerful groups may also otherwise
- Page 60 and 61: 2.7.1 Theories of national identity
- Page 62 and 63: understood as part of a broader str
- Page 64 and 65: significance (either implicitly or
- Page 66 and 67: …in the established nations, ther
- Page 68 and 69: The ‘history wars’ in Australia
- Page 70 and 71: In academia, the move is away from
- Page 72 and 73: and its internal and external other
- Page 74 and 75: Whilst this may be an extreme examp
- Page 76 and 77: conducted for this project due to t
- Page 78 and 79: Table 2.2 The Two Traditions of His
- Page 80 and 81: puts emphasis on the celebration of
- Page 82 and 83: emaining the same throughout. Stude
- Page 84 and 85: As one of few (current) educators i
- Page 86 and 87: A researcher bricoleur carefully se
- Page 88 and 89: approaches. What bricolage does off
2.3 Defining Textbooks<br />
One important way <strong>of</strong>ficial knowledge <strong>of</strong> school curriculum is communicated in classrooms<br />
is through the use <strong>of</strong> textbooks. In discussing how <strong>of</strong>ficial knowledge is constructed, Luke<br />
raises the point <strong>of</strong> the influence and impact particular constructions have, and how this is<br />
influenced by “…curriculum texts prepared by academics and teachers, and corporate<br />
publishers…” (1995-1996, p. 28). Textbooks are written from the perspective that the content<br />
contained within them is “what counts as knowledge…and, by default, alternative claims on<br />
the same knowledge arena or alternative lines <strong>of</strong> exploration are cast as irrelevant” (Issitt,<br />
2004, p. 689). Traditionally in Queensland textbooks have been written by school teachers,<br />
Queensland-based academics (usually former classroom teachers, such as H.R. Cowie),<br />
school and district inspectors, or compiled by anonymous Department <strong>of</strong> Education/Public<br />
Instruction public servants (especially in the case <strong>of</strong> Queensland Readers). In more recent<br />
times, there has been an increase in the education market <strong>of</strong> textbooks published by non-<br />
Queensland authors. This is arguably a result <strong>of</strong> the increasing nationalisation <strong>of</strong> curriculum<br />
that can be traced from about the mid-1990s onwards, with the advent <strong>of</strong> closer curriculum<br />
ties between Australian states, through the 1989 Hobart Declaration <strong>of</strong> Schooling and the<br />
updated 1999 Adelaide Declaration on National Goals <strong>of</strong> Schooling in the Twenty-first<br />
Century (as detailed in Appendix A: Contexts). For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this project, the authorship<br />
<strong>of</strong> textbooks remains with the former usual practices as the period <strong>of</strong> analysis ceases in 1988.<br />
Additionally, textbooks published for Queensland schools closely follow the requirements <strong>of</strong><br />
each school year level as outlined in the relevant syllabus. For the Queensland context, how<br />
the curriculum is realised through History textbooks including their publication is detailed in<br />
greater depth in Chapter 4: Data Analysis Introduction.<br />
Whilst there are many different ways to categorise and define exactly which types <strong>of</strong> written<br />
academic texts should be catalogued as textbooks, as explored by Issitt (2004), for the<br />
purposes <strong>of</strong> this dissertation, undertaking such a task is irrelevant. Instead, the textbooks<br />
selected for analysis are those that are marketed as being textbooks by publishing companies,<br />
such as Jacaranda and William Brooks, and those published by relevant Queensland<br />
government departments, The Department <strong>of</strong> Public Instruction later to become The<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Education. They are automatically considered textbooks due to the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
their publication (selection criteria for specific textbooks used for analysis is outlined in<br />
Chapter 3: Methodology, Research Design and Conduct). It is, however useful to look at the<br />
26