PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

2.3 Defining Textbooks One important way official knowledge of school curriculum is communicated in classrooms is through the use of textbooks. In discussing how official knowledge is constructed, Luke raises the point of the influence and impact particular constructions have, and how this is influenced by “…curriculum texts prepared by academics and teachers, and corporate publishers…” (1995-1996, p. 28). Textbooks are written from the perspective that the content contained within them is “what counts as knowledge…and, by default, alternative claims on the same knowledge arena or alternative lines of exploration are cast as irrelevant” (Issitt, 2004, p. 689). Traditionally in Queensland textbooks have been written by school teachers, Queensland-based academics (usually former classroom teachers, such as H.R. Cowie), school and district inspectors, or compiled by anonymous Department of Education/Public Instruction public servants (especially in the case of Queensland Readers). In more recent times, there has been an increase in the education market of textbooks published by non- Queensland authors. This is arguably a result of the increasing nationalisation of curriculum that can be traced from about the mid-1990s onwards, with the advent of closer curriculum ties between Australian states, through the 1989 Hobart Declaration of Schooling and the updated 1999 Adelaide Declaration on National Goals of Schooling in the Twenty-first Century (as detailed in Appendix A: Contexts). For the purposes of this project, the authorship of textbooks remains with the former usual practices as the period of analysis ceases in 1988. Additionally, textbooks published for Queensland schools closely follow the requirements of each school year level as outlined in the relevant syllabus. For the Queensland context, how the curriculum is realised through History textbooks including their publication is detailed in greater depth in Chapter 4: Data Analysis Introduction. Whilst there are many different ways to categorise and define exactly which types of written academic texts should be catalogued as textbooks, as explored by Issitt (2004), for the purposes of this dissertation, undertaking such a task is irrelevant. Instead, the textbooks selected for analysis are those that are marketed as being textbooks by publishing companies, such as Jacaranda and William Brooks, and those published by relevant Queensland government departments, The Department of Public Instruction later to become The Department of Education. They are automatically considered textbooks due to the purpose of their publication (selection criteria for specific textbooks used for analysis is outlined in Chapter 3: Methodology, Research Design and Conduct). It is, however useful to look at the 26

way textbooks are defined by their genre, and one offered by Hoskin states, “…two driving principles that distinguish books as a form of textuality: normalization and expansionism. Textbooks as a genre are driven by normalization, as they shape their message according to normalizing constraints” (1990, p. 2). The normalising processes that take place through their use will be explored in depth during the data analysis stages. Building on the statements of textbooks purposes, Hamilton considers that “…textbooks visibly reflect pedagogic considerations. That is, a textbook is not just a book used in schools. Rather, it is a book that has been consciously designed and organised to serve…schooling” (1990, p. 1). By and large, textbooks structure content and treat the reader (in this case, school students) as “textual subjects” rather than “agents” (Pink, 2001, p. 5), promoting a passive, accepting reading of the knowledge, as opposed to active engagement and critiquing of the information presented. This then influences the style of writing and structure of textbooks as generally passive and authoritative, and as Giroux claims a “...‘reified view of knowledge’, meaning a form of knowledge that is beyond question, that erases the fact that it was produced by humans operating in a particular context with a specific set of values” (as cited in Steinberg & Kincheloe, 1998, p. 5). Regarding the tone of textbooks, Issitt writes: In general, the particular voice of the textbooks author is subsumed within a monotone of expositionary clarity. It is this authorial monotone that underlines the claim to objectivity and political neutrality inherent in textbooks. In removing, or possibly camouflaging the author’s particularities and personal agendas, the textbook fits the genre and invites a learning engagement already ring-fenced by cultural markers and rules. (2004, p. 688). To what degree this is reflected in the textbooks selected for this project is analysed and included for discussion in each of the data analysis chapters. 2.3.1 Use and importance of textbooks. Textbooks are often viewed in a negative light, with many people perceiving them to be difficult to comprehend, boring and presented as an uninteresting way to learn (see, for example, Osborne’s, 2003 study of Canadian History curriculum). However, as they are used extensively in schools, particularly in secondary teaching, they are therefore important to consider when discussing what constitutes the official knowledge present in the school curriculum. As John Daniel, former Assistant General Director, UNESCO writes: “...school 27

2.3 Defining Textbooks<br />

One important way <strong>of</strong>ficial knowledge <strong>of</strong> school curriculum is communicated in classrooms<br />

is through the use <strong>of</strong> textbooks. In discussing how <strong>of</strong>ficial knowledge is constructed, Luke<br />

raises the point <strong>of</strong> the influence and impact particular constructions have, and how this is<br />

influenced by “…curriculum texts prepared by academics and teachers, and corporate<br />

publishers…” (1995-1996, p. 28). Textbooks are written from the perspective that the content<br />

contained within them is “what counts as knowledge…and, by default, alternative claims on<br />

the same knowledge arena or alternative lines <strong>of</strong> exploration are cast as irrelevant” (Issitt,<br />

2004, p. 689). Traditionally in Queensland textbooks have been written by school teachers,<br />

Queensland-based academics (usually former classroom teachers, such as H.R. Cowie),<br />

school and district inspectors, or compiled by anonymous Department <strong>of</strong> Education/Public<br />

Instruction public servants (especially in the case <strong>of</strong> Queensland Readers). In more recent<br />

times, there has been an increase in the education market <strong>of</strong> textbooks published by non-<br />

Queensland authors. This is arguably a result <strong>of</strong> the increasing nationalisation <strong>of</strong> curriculum<br />

that can be traced from about the mid-1990s onwards, with the advent <strong>of</strong> closer curriculum<br />

ties between Australian states, through the 1989 Hobart Declaration <strong>of</strong> Schooling and the<br />

updated 1999 Adelaide Declaration on National Goals <strong>of</strong> Schooling in the Twenty-first<br />

Century (as detailed in Appendix A: Contexts). For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this project, the authorship<br />

<strong>of</strong> textbooks remains with the former usual practices as the period <strong>of</strong> analysis ceases in 1988.<br />

Additionally, textbooks published for Queensland schools closely follow the requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

each school year level as outlined in the relevant syllabus. For the Queensland context, how<br />

the curriculum is realised through History textbooks including their publication is detailed in<br />

greater depth in Chapter 4: Data Analysis Introduction.<br />

Whilst there are many different ways to categorise and define exactly which types <strong>of</strong> written<br />

academic texts should be catalogued as textbooks, as explored by Issitt (2004), for the<br />

purposes <strong>of</strong> this dissertation, undertaking such a task is irrelevant. Instead, the textbooks<br />

selected for analysis are those that are marketed as being textbooks by publishing companies,<br />

such as Jacaranda and William Brooks, and those published by relevant Queensland<br />

government departments, The Department <strong>of</strong> Public Instruction later to become The<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Education. They are automatically considered textbooks due to the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

their publication (selection criteria for specific textbooks used for analysis is outlined in<br />

Chapter 3: Methodology, Research Design and Conduct). It is, however useful to look at the<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!