PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

following statement: “Political leaders of all parties had agreed, however, to the British condition that in time of war the Commonwealth government would place the ships of the RAN [Royal Australian Navy] under the command of the Royal Navy” (Cowie, 1980, p. 200). However even with the discourse of allegiance demonstrated through military ties, topics demonstrating Australia’s emerging independence as a nation and dissociation from Great Britain are included, even in instances when Great Britain did not agree with the course of action taken by Australia (see, for example, Source 7.84). Source 7.84. Example of Australia’s dissociation from Great Britain extract from Crossroads: Asia and Australia in world affairs (Cowie, 1980, p. 200). The contrast of topics regarding Australia’s relationship with Great Britain in the early years of federation seems to be included as a way to demonstrate Australia’s growth as an independent nation, justified for inclusion as a way to show that Australia was consciously and strategically moving away from Great Britain. 7.17.2 Discourse of allegiance to Great Britain as a dominion In a rare example for textbooks published during this era, The modern world emerges (Lawrence et al., 1986) explains Australia’s dominion status as a nation post-federation, linking foreign policy decisions made regarding this status. Whereas, commonly textbooks do not explain reasons for Australia following Great Britain into conflicts such as WWI other than through an emotional allegiance, The modern world emerges (Lawrence et al., 1986) explains to students the political-legal reasons for Australian joining Great Britain in declaring war (see, for example, Source 7.85). 384

Source 7.85. Political-legal reasons for Australia joining WWI extract from Chapter 13: The nation is born reads: (Lawrence et al., 1986, p. 288) Source 7.85 also emphasizes the emotional connection and sentiment expressed towards Britain and the British Empire, providing an explanation for it, rather than seeing it as an unjustified or irrational feeling: “after all, 98 per cent of Australia’s population came from Britain or part of the British Empire. Britain was often referred to as the “mother country” or the “old country” or “home”.” (Lawrence et al, 1986, p. 288). By referring to both politicallegal and emotional reasons for Australia’s connection to Britain, it is evident that the authors are trying to put forth a balanced or measured history narrative; and although it presents all information as a factual truth with no space for knowledge fluidity, at least more than one perspective is included that attributes Australia’s allegiance to Great Britain. 7.18 Category 5: World War I (WWI) 7.18.1 Discourses of blame and defeat. The discourse of blame towards actions taken by Great Britain towards use of Australian troops in Gallipoli is strong in The modern world emerges (Lawrence et al., 1986). The following terms are examples of those used to describe failings of actions by British commanders and government: “disaster”; “error”; “underestimated…size and quality of the Turkish forces”; “neither side gained ground”; “hills covered with dead, and the stench of the decaying bodies became unbearable”; “not let them retreat” (Lawrence et al., 1986, p. 295); 385

following statement: “Political leaders <strong>of</strong> all parties had agreed, however, to the British<br />

condition that in time <strong>of</strong> war the Commonwealth government would place the ships <strong>of</strong> the<br />

RAN [Royal Australian Navy] under the command <strong>of</strong> the Royal Navy” (Cowie, 1980, p.<br />

200). However even with the discourse <strong>of</strong> allegiance demonstrated through military ties,<br />

topics demonstrating Australia’s emerging independence as a nation and dissociation from<br />

Great Britain are included, even in instances when Great Britain did not agree with the course<br />

<strong>of</strong> action taken by Australia (see, for example, Source 7.84).<br />

Source 7.84. Example <strong>of</strong> Australia’s dissociation from Great Britain extract from<br />

Crossroads: Asia and Australia in world affairs (Cowie, 1980, p. 200).<br />

The contrast <strong>of</strong> topics regarding Australia’s relationship with Great Britain in the early years<br />

<strong>of</strong> federation seems to be included as a way to demonstrate Australia’s growth as an<br />

independent nation, justified for inclusion as a way to show that Australia was consciously<br />

and strategically moving away from Great Britain.<br />

7.17.2 Discourse <strong>of</strong> allegiance to Great Britain as a dominion<br />

In a rare example for textbooks published during this era, The modern world emerges<br />

(Lawrence et al., 1986) explains Australia’s dominion status as a nation post-federation,<br />

linking foreign policy decisions made regarding this status. Whereas, commonly textbooks do<br />

not explain reasons for Australia following Great Britain into conflicts such as WWI other<br />

than through an emotional allegiance, The modern world emerges (Lawrence et al., 1986)<br />

explains to students the political-legal reasons for Australian joining Great Britain in<br />

declaring war (see, for example, Source 7.85).<br />

384

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!