PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
7.67. Two examples in particular show this from a Pupil information sheet. The first is indicative of the way British heritages are significantly silenced during this era. Source 7.67. Extract from a Pupil information sheet in Primary Social Studies sourcebook year 5 (Department of Education, 1988a, p. 115) There is no information provided of who “granted ‘responsible government’” (Department of Education, 1988a, p. 115) or who the “settlers demanded a greater role in their own government” (Department of Education, 1988a, p. 115) from, effectively silencing British heritages. The second example is out-of-context to other information the students have been exposed to throughout this unit, with the Pupil information sheet containing only one reference to Great Britain, in its concluding paragraph (see Source 7.68). Source 7.68. Pupil information sheet extract from Primary Social Studies sourcebook year 5 (Department of Education, 1988a, p. 115). These two extracts draw attention to a disjointed representation of Federation, notwithstanding the exclusion of British heritages. Not even the date of Federation (1 January, 1901) is included for students to learn—a basic historical fact that students need to be exposed to if the curriculum is to accurately cover Australian history. Regarding the place of Australia’s Federation included in the high school curriculum, in discussing the reasons for Federation, Spanning time (Power et al., 1985) leaves out any mention of Great Britain, which other textbooks from this era (for example Cowie, 1980) recognise as being an important factor in shaping arguments both for and against Federation. These inclusions are analysed in the appropriate section of this chapter. In the decision of 366
many textbooks and curriculum materials to leave out Australia’s Federation, students are not exposed to the deep political and social connection Australia had with Great Britain. 7.14.5 Representations of political leaders. J.T. Lang, arguably New South Wales’ most prominent and controversial Premier, is well known not only for his sacking by the New South Wales Governor, but in particular his pro- Australian attitudes which significantly impacted his decision making as Premier. In the subsection, Who was J.T. Lang? within The modern world emerges (Lawrence et al., 1986) no mention of Great Britain is provided, instead the terms “overseas loans” and “bondholders” (Lawrence et al., 1986, p. 326) are used. This is despite Lang being quite vocal in his pro-Australian (which has often been portrayed as being anti-British) sentiment towards what he perceived as unfair war loan repayments to Great Britain, with the first point of his proposed plan (that became known as the Lang Plan) stating: That the government of Australia pay no further interest to British bondholders until Britain had dealt with the Australian overseas debt in the same manner as she had settled her own foreign debts with America”...If Britain agreed to compound Australia’s debts on the same basis, most of our external troubles would be over. (Lang, 1970, p. 100, emphasis added) Lang’s loyalty to the needs of Australia and the unemployed during the economic hardship that was brought on by The Great Depression is further explained in his autobiography as: We had been told at the Canberra Conference that the banks were on the verge of default. They could not find £18 million to save the unemployed. They could not carry existing overdrafts. But what had happened when the New South Wales Government had refused to find £700,000 to meet overseas interest payments owing to the Bank of Westminster? The banks had found the money immediately. Where did they get it? The Scullin Government took the money without a word of explanation. They paid it out without a word of explanation. They paid it out to London. Why hadn’t they used it to help the unemployed? (Lang, 1970, p. 111) The textbook mediates Lang’s vehement debate about the non-repayment of British war loans through the more passive term “overseas”. Why this is the case is unclear, as the textbook includes many examples of Britain being explicitly mentioned in its relationship to Australia, 367
- Page 330 and 331: Source 7.19. Yiwara “special obli
- Page 332 and 333: suggestions on how teachers are to
- Page 334 and 335: As demonstrated in Source 7.23, thi
- Page 336 and 337: Source 7.28. “The first Australia
- Page 338 and 339: settlement. However, documents reve
- Page 340 and 341: of the early interactions between T
- Page 342 and 343: Given that this textbook was publis
- Page 344 and 345: overtly, as the issues of land righ
- Page 346 and 347: The Wave Hill walkout, covering the
- Page 348 and 349: textbook author is presenting for s
- Page 350 and 351: Crossroads: Imperialism and race re
- Page 352 and 353: Source 7.42. Vincent Lingiari’s n
- Page 354 and 355: Australia’s referenda history—w
- Page 356 and 357: Source 7.45 demonstrates that throu
- Page 358 and 359: of Indigenous Australian cultures.
- Page 360 and 361: the 42 page unit of work in a textb
- Page 362 and 363: Source 7.53. Continuity of Indigeno
- Page 364 and 365: in conjunction with non-Indigenous
- Page 366 and 367: Source 7.57. Activity ideas for Nat
- Page 368 and 369: Unit 3: Modern Australia emerges co
- Page 370 and 371: demonstrate, even at a minor and in
- Page 372 and 373: students are exposed to no aspects
- Page 374 and 375: first Australians and I’m an Aust
- Page 376 and 377: eing taught until the upper primary
- Page 378 and 379: which details the setting up of a c
- Page 382 and 383: unlike other textbooks which discus
- Page 384 and 385: However, although this statement wa
- Page 386 and 387: fear of Japan, that the Australian
- Page 388 and 389: Australia in both WWI and WWII. The
- Page 390 and 391: Source 7.73. Treaty of Versailles e
- Page 392 and 393: The Australian government realized
- Page 394 and 395: Task 41: Australian foreign policy
- Page 396 and 397: enemy threatening to invade our sho
- Page 398 and 399: following statement: “Political l
- Page 400 and 401: “doomed to failure”; “finally
- Page 402 and 403: So strong are the stories of the Ga
- Page 404 and 405: Moving beyond a simplistic discours
- Page 406 and 407: Nationalists, opposed to the Britis
- Page 408 and 409: This demonstrates the importance Gr
- Page 410 and 411: entered mainstream public conscious
- Page 412 and 413: explains the purpose of including T
- Page 414 and 415: Source 7.95. “Pupil information s
- Page 416 and 417: terminology of European is stated w
- Page 418 and 419: 7.23.6 Representations of British h
- Page 420 and 421: 406
- Page 422 and 423: findings of the analysis through ar
- Page 424 and 425: curriculum in such a way that the h
- Page 426 and 427: (and at times former dominant disco
- Page 428 and 429: natives and often gave them present
many textbooks and curriculum materials to leave out Australia’s Federation, students are not<br />
exposed to the deep political and social connection Australia had with Great Britain.<br />
7.14.5 Representations <strong>of</strong> political leaders.<br />
J.T. Lang, arguably New South Wales’ most prominent and controversial Premier, is well<br />
known not only for his sacking by the New South Wales Governor, but in particular his pro-<br />
Australian attitudes which significantly impacted his decision making as Premier. In the<br />
subsection, Who was J.T. Lang? within The modern world emerges (Lawrence et al., 1986)<br />
no mention <strong>of</strong> Great Britain is provided, instead the terms “overseas loans” and<br />
“bondholders” (Lawrence et al., 1986, p. 326) are used. This is despite Lang being quite<br />
vocal in his pro-Australian (which has <strong>of</strong>ten been portrayed as being anti-British) sentiment<br />
towards what he perceived as unfair war loan repayments to Great Britain, with the first point<br />
<strong>of</strong> his proposed plan (that became known as the Lang Plan) stating:<br />
That the government <strong>of</strong> Australia pay no further interest to British bondholders until<br />
Britain had dealt with the Australian overseas debt in the same manner as she had<br />
settled her own foreign debts with America”...If Britain agreed to compound<br />
Australia’s debts on the same basis, most <strong>of</strong> our external troubles would be over.<br />
(Lang, 1970, p. 100, emphasis added)<br />
Lang’s loyalty to the needs <strong>of</strong> Australia and the unemployed during the economic hardship<br />
that was brought on by The Great Depression is further explained in his autobiography as:<br />
We had been told at the Canberra Conference that the banks were on the verge <strong>of</strong><br />
default. They could not find £18 million to save the unemployed. They could not<br />
carry existing overdrafts. But what had happened when the New South Wales<br />
Government had refused to find £700,000 to meet overseas interest payments owing<br />
to the Bank <strong>of</strong> Westminster? The banks had found the money immediately. Where<br />
did they get it? The Scullin Government took the money without a word <strong>of</strong><br />
explanation. They paid it out without a word <strong>of</strong> explanation. They paid it out to<br />
London. Why hadn’t they used it to help the unemployed? (Lang, 1970, p. 111)<br />
The textbook mediates Lang’s vehement debate about the non-repayment <strong>of</strong> British war loans<br />
through the more passive term “overseas”. Why this is the case is unclear, as the textbook<br />
includes many examples <strong>of</strong> Britain being explicitly mentioned in its relationship to Australia,<br />
367