PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

7.67. Two examples in particular show this from a Pupil information sheet. The first is indicative of the way British heritages are significantly silenced during this era. Source 7.67. Extract from a Pupil information sheet in Primary Social Studies sourcebook year 5 (Department of Education, 1988a, p. 115) There is no information provided of who “granted ‘responsible government’” (Department of Education, 1988a, p. 115) or who the “settlers demanded a greater role in their own government” (Department of Education, 1988a, p. 115) from, effectively silencing British heritages. The second example is out-of-context to other information the students have been exposed to throughout this unit, with the Pupil information sheet containing only one reference to Great Britain, in its concluding paragraph (see Source 7.68). Source 7.68. Pupil information sheet extract from Primary Social Studies sourcebook year 5 (Department of Education, 1988a, p. 115). These two extracts draw attention to a disjointed representation of Federation, notwithstanding the exclusion of British heritages. Not even the date of Federation (1 January, 1901) is included for students to learn—a basic historical fact that students need to be exposed to if the curriculum is to accurately cover Australian history. Regarding the place of Australia’s Federation included in the high school curriculum, in discussing the reasons for Federation, Spanning time (Power et al., 1985) leaves out any mention of Great Britain, which other textbooks from this era (for example Cowie, 1980) recognise as being an important factor in shaping arguments both for and against Federation. These inclusions are analysed in the appropriate section of this chapter. In the decision of 366

many textbooks and curriculum materials to leave out Australia’s Federation, students are not exposed to the deep political and social connection Australia had with Great Britain. 7.14.5 Representations of political leaders. J.T. Lang, arguably New South Wales’ most prominent and controversial Premier, is well known not only for his sacking by the New South Wales Governor, but in particular his pro- Australian attitudes which significantly impacted his decision making as Premier. In the subsection, Who was J.T. Lang? within The modern world emerges (Lawrence et al., 1986) no mention of Great Britain is provided, instead the terms “overseas loans” and “bondholders” (Lawrence et al., 1986, p. 326) are used. This is despite Lang being quite vocal in his pro-Australian (which has often been portrayed as being anti-British) sentiment towards what he perceived as unfair war loan repayments to Great Britain, with the first point of his proposed plan (that became known as the Lang Plan) stating: That the government of Australia pay no further interest to British bondholders until Britain had dealt with the Australian overseas debt in the same manner as she had settled her own foreign debts with America”...If Britain agreed to compound Australia’s debts on the same basis, most of our external troubles would be over. (Lang, 1970, p. 100, emphasis added) Lang’s loyalty to the needs of Australia and the unemployed during the economic hardship that was brought on by The Great Depression is further explained in his autobiography as: We had been told at the Canberra Conference that the banks were on the verge of default. They could not find £18 million to save the unemployed. They could not carry existing overdrafts. But what had happened when the New South Wales Government had refused to find £700,000 to meet overseas interest payments owing to the Bank of Westminster? The banks had found the money immediately. Where did they get it? The Scullin Government took the money without a word of explanation. They paid it out without a word of explanation. They paid it out to London. Why hadn’t they used it to help the unemployed? (Lang, 1970, p. 111) The textbook mediates Lang’s vehement debate about the non-repayment of British war loans through the more passive term “overseas”. Why this is the case is unclear, as the textbook includes many examples of Britain being explicitly mentioned in its relationship to Australia, 367

many textbooks and curriculum materials to leave out Australia’s Federation, students are not<br />

exposed to the deep political and social connection Australia had with Great Britain.<br />

7.14.5 Representations <strong>of</strong> political leaders.<br />

J.T. Lang, arguably New South Wales’ most prominent and controversial Premier, is well<br />

known not only for his sacking by the New South Wales Governor, but in particular his pro-<br />

Australian attitudes which significantly impacted his decision making as Premier. In the<br />

subsection, Who was J.T. Lang? within The modern world emerges (Lawrence et al., 1986)<br />

no mention <strong>of</strong> Great Britain is provided, instead the terms “overseas loans” and<br />

“bondholders” (Lawrence et al., 1986, p. 326) are used. This is despite Lang being quite<br />

vocal in his pro-Australian (which has <strong>of</strong>ten been portrayed as being anti-British) sentiment<br />

towards what he perceived as unfair war loan repayments to Great Britain, with the first point<br />

<strong>of</strong> his proposed plan (that became known as the Lang Plan) stating:<br />

That the government <strong>of</strong> Australia pay no further interest to British bondholders until<br />

Britain had dealt with the Australian overseas debt in the same manner as she had<br />

settled her own foreign debts with America”...If Britain agreed to compound<br />

Australia’s debts on the same basis, most <strong>of</strong> our external troubles would be over.<br />

(Lang, 1970, p. 100, emphasis added)<br />

Lang’s loyalty to the needs <strong>of</strong> Australia and the unemployed during the economic hardship<br />

that was brought on by The Great Depression is further explained in his autobiography as:<br />

We had been told at the Canberra Conference that the banks were on the verge <strong>of</strong><br />

default. They could not find £18 million to save the unemployed. They could not<br />

carry existing overdrafts. But what had happened when the New South Wales<br />

Government had refused to find £700,000 to meet overseas interest payments owing<br />

to the Bank <strong>of</strong> Westminster? The banks had found the money immediately. Where<br />

did they get it? The Scullin Government took the money without a word <strong>of</strong><br />

explanation. They paid it out without a word <strong>of</strong> explanation. They paid it out to<br />

London. Why hadn’t they used it to help the unemployed? (Lang, 1970, p. 111)<br />

The textbook mediates Lang’s vehement debate about the non-repayment <strong>of</strong> British war loans<br />

through the more passive term “overseas”. Why this is the case is unclear, as the textbook<br />

includes many examples <strong>of</strong> Britain being explicitly mentioned in its relationship to Australia,<br />

367

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!