11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

construction <strong>of</strong> Australian history yet do not go beyond this statement in presenting this as a<br />

topic <strong>of</strong> complexity to students. Given this, it could be viewed as an almost self-conscious<br />

disclaimer, as though the textbook writers would like to write more, but are aware <strong>of</strong> the<br />

political sensitivities around doing so. A sensitivity that when ignored six years later in 1994<br />

resulted in significant negative publicity by those in the press when the term invasion was<br />

used.<br />

7.11.4 Discourse <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Australians as problem-laden.<br />

There is a distinct discourse <strong>of</strong> problems operating in Junior secondary history for<br />

Queensland schools (Criswell & Deoki, 1982) that position Indigenous Australians as the<br />

sole bearers <strong>of</strong> responsibility for “...problems <strong>of</strong> their own in modern Australia” (Criswell &<br />

Deoki, 1982, p. 187). Specific terms used to identify Indigenous Australians as having<br />

problems include: “their own”, “Some find it difficult”, “do not want to”, “...more poverty,<br />

unemployment, sickness and crime among Aborigines” (Criswell & Deoki, 1982, p. 187).<br />

Linking with the discourse <strong>of</strong> policy and legislation already analysed in this chapter, the<br />

Government is seen as the liberator <strong>of</strong> these problems through the statement “the Government<br />

provides special facilities to look after Aboriginal people” (Criswell & Deoki, 1982, p. 187).<br />

Yet, the causes <strong>of</strong> the problems are firmly placed as the responsibility <strong>of</strong> Indigenous<br />

Australians, with little contextual information provided beyond a very vague conclusion <strong>of</strong>:<br />

“When white people first came to Australia, there were <strong>of</strong>ten misunderstandings between<br />

them and the Aborigines. Misunderstandings still cause problems today” (Criswell & Deoki,<br />

1982, p. 187).<br />

As the only representation <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Australians in the textbook, it is clear that<br />

Indigenous Australians are being portrayed as having significant racial deficits through, for<br />

example, content related to unemployment and crime. Whilst even a cursory glance at<br />

national statistics shows that Indigenous Australians are overrepresented in areas such as<br />

poverty and unemployment, rather than looking at systemic reasons for this, such as<br />

government policies or community attitudes, this textbook attributes all “problems” (Criswell<br />

& Deoki, 1982, p. 187) to Indigenous Australians. Other parts <strong>of</strong> society are not seen as<br />

contributing to the serious issues that are raised, nor is a combined effort seen as a way to<br />

address these serious issues. Furthermore, as the only representation <strong>of</strong> Indigenous<br />

Australians in Junior secondary history for Queensland schools (Criswell & Deoki, 1982)<br />

357

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!