PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

Unit 3: Modern Australia emerges constitutes the third of only three inclusions of Indigenous Australians and is representative of the fractured way this topic is written: And; • Aborigines set up an “embassy” of tents on the lawns of Parliament House to protest against the lack of action on the land rights issue. As the police moved one group off the lawns, another replaced it, much to the embarrassment of the government. (Lawrence et al., 1986, p. 377-78) In the elections of December 1972 Whitlam promised, if elected, to immediately: ... o Provide finance and support to Aborigines [then later on the same page in section titled “The Whitlam government (1972 to 1975)] ...Whitlam and Barnard announced many new regulations: ... o Spending on Aboriginal welfare was increased o Mining leases on Aboriginal reserves were suspended. (Lawrence et al., 1986, p. 377-78) An explanation of the actions of the McMahon government that led to the setting up of the Tent Embassy is not articulated beyond a vague “…to protest against the lack of action on the land rights issue” (Lawrence et al., 1986, p. 377). Furthermore, the endurance of the Tent Embassy physically positioned on the front lawn of the now-former Parliament House (commonly called Old Parliament House) is not mentioned as a point of historical significance. Support the textbook writers have towards the Whitlam Labor government over the McMahon Liberal government is evident from their pointing out of the failure of the McMahon government to provide land rights to Indigenous Australians. However, there is no critique of the Whitlam Government’s actions which, although an election promise was made to provide land rights to all Indigenous Australians, was watered-down once in Parliament to include only those Indigenous Australians from the Commonwealth Territories. So, through this partisan perspective in addition to the paucity of information included, students are not provided with an accurate or comprehensive exposure to this period of rapid social and political change in contemporary Australian history. The lack of critique of the Whitlam 354

Labor government in this textbook is similar to that in Case studies in Australian history (Stewart, 1986), providing a consistent, and not necessarily accurate representation to students that Labor governments care about Indigenous issues, whilst Liberal-National governments do not. The Modern World Emerges (Lawrence et al., 1986) contains significant milestones of world history during the 20 th century. The unit on Australia, which covers approximately a quarter of the textbook, traces significant political events, including Federation, Australia’s involvement in WWI, contrasts the 1920s with the Great Depression of the 1930s, Australia’s involvement in WWII and finishes with a section titled “Australia since 1945” (Lawrence et al., 1986, p. 359). Throughout the Australian unit, major events which could be considered as the canon of Australia’s modern history are detailed. The exclusion of Indigenous Australians throughout this unit is indicative of the little importance placed on Indigenous histories and events, policies and issues which directly impact on the lives of Indigenous Australians. For example, there is no information about the 1967 referendum, Wave Hill Station Strike or the Freedom bus ride. When content concerning Indigenous Australians is included, it is clearly placed on the periphery, as dot point summaries at the end of sections. This is epitomized through the following extract from a section titled “The first parliament”, the second of three content areas of Indigenous Australians included in the textbook: the Franchise Act (1902), giving the right to vote to all people over twenty-one who were Australian-born, British or naturalized British subjects. Thus Australia was one of the earliest countries where women won the right to vote. However, at this stage Aborigines were not allowed to vote. In fact, Aborigines were not even included in the population census. (Lawrence et al., 1986, p. 282, emphasis added) Similar to The modern world emerges (Lawrence et al., 1986) in representing Indigenous Australians on the peripheral of history, the only visual representation of Indigenous Australians in Junior secondary History for Queensland schools (Crisswell & Deoki, 1982) is out of context to any written text. Here, Indigenous Australians are represented through one male dressed in traditional clothing of a loin cloth and headdress in a traditional dance pose in a street parade. The question and statement that act as the caption to the photo require students to respond with knowledge that they could not have gained from the textbook, nor been directed to by the textbook (see image at Source 7.59). By doing this, the authors are positioning Indigenous Australians as a token inclusion—as a curiosity or way to 355

Labor government in this textbook is similar to that in Case studies in Australian history<br />

(Stewart, 1986), providing a consistent, and not necessarily accurate representation to<br />

students that Labor governments care about Indigenous issues, whilst Liberal-National<br />

governments do not.<br />

The Modern World Emerges (Lawrence et al., 1986) contains significant milestones <strong>of</strong> world<br />

history during the 20 th century. The unit on Australia, which covers approximately a quarter<br />

<strong>of</strong> the textbook, traces significant political events, including Federation, Australia’s<br />

involvement in WWI, contrasts the 1920s with the Great Depression <strong>of</strong> the 1930s, Australia’s<br />

involvement in WWII and finishes with a section titled “Australia since 1945” (Lawrence et<br />

al., 1986, p. 359). Throughout the Australian unit, major events which could be considered as<br />

the canon <strong>of</strong> Australia’s modern history are detailed. The exclusion <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Australians<br />

throughout this unit is indicative <strong>of</strong> the little importance placed on Indigenous histories and<br />

events, policies and issues which directly impact on the lives <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Australians. For<br />

example, there is no information about the 1967 referendum, Wave Hill Station Strike or the<br />

Freedom bus ride. When content concerning Indigenous Australians is included, it is clearly<br />

placed on the periphery, as dot point summaries at the end <strong>of</strong> sections. This is epitomized<br />

through the following extract from a section titled “The first parliament”, the second <strong>of</strong> three<br />

content areas <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Australians included in the textbook:<br />

the Franchise Act (1902), giving the right to vote to all people over twenty-one who<br />

were Australian-born, British or naturalized British subjects. Thus Australia was one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the earliest countries where women won the right to vote. However, at this stage<br />

Aborigines were not allowed to vote. In fact, Aborigines were not even included in<br />

the population census. (Lawrence et al., 1986, p. 282, emphasis added)<br />

Similar to The modern world emerges (Lawrence et al., 1986) in representing Indigenous<br />

Australians on the peripheral <strong>of</strong> history, the only visual representation <strong>of</strong> Indigenous<br />

Australians in Junior secondary History for Queensland schools (Crisswell & Deoki, 1982) is<br />

out <strong>of</strong> context to any written text. Here, Indigenous Australians are represented through one<br />

male dressed in traditional clothing <strong>of</strong> a loin cloth and headdress in a traditional dance pose in<br />

a street parade. The question and statement that act as the caption to the photo require<br />

students to respond with knowledge that they could not have gained from the textbook, nor<br />

been directed to by the textbook (see image at Source 7.59). By doing this, the authors are<br />

positioning Indigenous Australians as a token inclusion—as a curiosity or way to<br />

355

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!