PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

Social Studies for Queensland schools grade 6 (Department of Education, 1955/1966) is a primary school example of critical use of sources, where an alternative perspective of valuing natural resources is presented to students, as analysed earlier in this chapter. In addition, the term base book starts being used to describe a textbook (see, for example, Hendy et al., 1976, p. 7). H.R. Cowie also continued using this term in textbooks published during the early 1980s. This term is used by textbook writers to indicate that their textbook should be used only as a starting point, rather than an all-encompassing curriculum document. By including references for further reading, they are also providing teachers and students with other sources to be used in classroom teaching and student learning. Further demonstrating the trend of viewing students as active participants in their learning, there is considerable change in approach between the first and second edition of Australia’s heritage (Sparkes et al., 1964; 1970). Whereas in the first edition, student learning was very much through a traditional didactic approach; the 1970 edition, through the addition of key changes such as ‘For Research and Discussion’ and ‘References’ sections at the end of each chapter, promote both a more active student learning approach and begin to demonstrate that there is knowledge of value outside of and not necessarily connected with individual textbooks. These changes are explained by the authors, in the preface, as: “In the last seven or eight years, the approach to the teaching of history has been changing also. Much more emphasis is being placed on enquiry techniques and this is to be commended” (Sparkes et al., 1970, p. 6). However, despite the changes in pedagogical approach, often made explicit by the textbook writers, the content of textbooks in terms of Indigenous representations do not change in any significant way, demonstrating that even with innovative pedagogical practices employed, the curriculum can still contain significant omissions to the detriment of students’ knowledge and understanding of key historical events, facts and issues. 6.11.5 Use of primary and secondary sources. There is a notable disparity between terms used to describe Indigenous Australians when the textbook is writing in present tense, than what is used when quoting from primary sources. To explain, textbooks of the era do not use terms such as ‘savage’ or ‘blacks’ (whereas this was language used in earlier eras) in narratives that the authors write for students as a secondary source. As secondary sources, Indigenous Australians are referred to by terms such 286

as ‘Aborigines’, ‘Aboriginals’; less common by individual name, for example ‘Jacky Jacky’, ‘Wylie’, ‘Robert Tudawali’, and ‘Albert Namatjira’; and even less commonly by tribal affiliation, for example “Gurindji” (Blackmore et al., 1969, p. 167). However, when primary sources are used not only are they rarely accurately attributed to the original source of author, for example “A nineteenth century historian” (Blackmore et al., 1969, p. 164), but potentially inflammatory terms such as ‘savage’, ‘primitive’ and ‘native’ are used (as shown throughout the analysis of textbooks in this chapter). Whilst it is indicated through quotation marks that a primary source from a past period of time is being used, there is never any mediation for students of these terms, resulting in a complicit acceptance, strengthened by the position of power a textbook has over students and also teachers as a tool of teaching and learning. As a process of acculturating students into the work of an historian, including primary source documents even if they do incorporate terms that are no longer socially or politically acceptable is an important part of that process. However, where the curriculum documents across the board fail students is that there is no mediation of how these terms are used, either in the past or in the present, which potentially leads to prejudices and other preconceived, uneducated views being reinforced, rather than using the texts as an opportunity to challenge perspectives in consideration of changed socio-political attitudes and beliefs. 6.11.6 Curriculum as gatekeeper of conservative content and values or agent for change. Indigenous Australians and Indigenous representations more generally, are portrayed as both a-historical, out of context and disconnected from other curriculum content (such as excluded from chronologies of national history); perpetrators of violence against explorers; and increasingly as victims of white colonisation. This discourse of victimhood infiltrates the curriculum, particularly in contemporary representations of Indigenous Australians. For example, one of the few visual representations of Indigenous Australians in a contemporary setting portrays a group of Indigenous women and children from the outback as an example of poverty (Blackmore et al., 1969, p. 167), and can be seen as aligned with the dominant socio-political views of the time, being assimilation. In different textbooks, there is significant disjuncture of Indigenous representations within this same era. On the one hand, there are representations of anonymous ‘natives’ interacting with explorers. Yet, on the other hand, there are occasional stories of Indigenous Australians belonging to specific tribal groups, for example “Gurindji tribe of Wave Hill” (Blackmore et 287

Social Studies for Queensland schools grade 6 (Department <strong>of</strong> Education, 1955/1966) is a<br />

primary school example <strong>of</strong> critical use <strong>of</strong> sources, where an alternative perspective <strong>of</strong> valuing<br />

natural resources is presented to students, as analysed earlier in this chapter.<br />

In addition, the term base book starts being used to describe a textbook (see, for example,<br />

Hendy et al., 1976, p. 7). H.R. Cowie also continued using this term in textbooks published<br />

during the early 1980s. This term is used by textbook writers to indicate that their textbook<br />

should be used only as a starting point, rather than an all-encompassing curriculum<br />

document. By including references for further reading, they are also providing teachers and<br />

students with other sources to be used in classroom teaching and student learning.<br />

Further demonstrating the trend <strong>of</strong> viewing students as active participants in their learning,<br />

there is considerable change in approach between the first and second edition <strong>of</strong> Australia’s<br />

heritage (Sparkes et al., 1964; 1970). Whereas in the first edition, student learning was very<br />

much through a traditional didactic approach; the 1970 edition, through the addition <strong>of</strong> key<br />

changes such as ‘For Research and Discussion’ and ‘References’ sections at the end <strong>of</strong> each<br />

chapter, promote both a more active student learning approach and begin to demonstrate that<br />

there is knowledge <strong>of</strong> value outside <strong>of</strong> and not necessarily connected with individual<br />

textbooks. These changes are explained by the authors, in the preface, as: “In the last seven or<br />

eight years, the approach to the teaching <strong>of</strong> history has been changing also. Much more<br />

emphasis is being placed on enquiry techniques and this is to be commended” (Sparkes et al.,<br />

1970, p. 6). However, despite the changes in pedagogical approach, <strong>of</strong>ten made explicit by<br />

the textbook writers, the content <strong>of</strong> textbooks in terms <strong>of</strong> Indigenous representations do not<br />

change in any significant way, demonstrating that even with innovative pedagogical practices<br />

employed, the curriculum can still contain significant omissions to the detriment <strong>of</strong> students’<br />

knowledge and understanding <strong>of</strong> key historical events, facts and issues.<br />

6.11.5 Use <strong>of</strong> primary and secondary sources.<br />

There is a notable disparity between terms used to describe Indigenous Australians when the<br />

textbook is writing in present tense, than what is used when quoting from primary sources.<br />

To explain, textbooks <strong>of</strong> the era do not use terms such as ‘savage’ or ‘blacks’ (whereas this<br />

was language used in earlier eras) in narratives that the authors write for students as a<br />

secondary source. As secondary sources, Indigenous Australians are referred to by terms such<br />

286

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!