11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ideology in a simple form, is taken to mean, “...the ‘system’ <strong>of</strong> ideas, beliefs, fundamental<br />

commitments, or values about social reality” (Apple, 2004, p. 18) and “...represents the<br />

imaginary relationship <strong>of</strong> individuals to their real conditions <strong>of</strong> existence” (Althusser, 1984,<br />

p. 36). This is applied to the relationship between how <strong>of</strong>ficial knowledge in school<br />

curriculum is established and maintained and the broader issues that influence what is<br />

included and excluded, such as social, political and economical. Furthermore, by seeing<br />

ideology as “a system <strong>of</strong> beliefs by which we make sense <strong>of</strong> the world” (Stephens as cited in<br />

Pinsent, 1997, p. 1), the sense-making that History textbooks communicate to students can be<br />

located for analysis. In particular, when the term is used as part <strong>of</strong> the methodology, the work<br />

<strong>of</strong> Althusser (1984, 1971) and Gramsci (1957, 1971; Fairclough and Wodak, 1997) plays a<br />

significant role in informing the application <strong>of</strong> this term specifically in connection with<br />

notions <strong>of</strong> hegemony in school curriculum and public discourses. The following extract<br />

provides a definition <strong>of</strong> ideology, in relation to discourse analysis, that this project takes:<br />

Ideologies are constructions <strong>of</strong> practices from particular perspectives (and in that<br />

sense ‘one-sided’) which ‘iron out’ the contradictions, dilemmas and antagonisms <strong>of</strong><br />

practices in ways which accord with the interests and projects <strong>of</strong> domination. The<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> ideologies in ‘ironing out’ (i.e., suppressing) aspects <strong>of</strong> practices is what<br />

links ideologies to ‘mystification’ (Barrett 1991, p. 167) and ‘misrecognition’<br />

(Althusser 1972; Bourdieu 1991). Ideologies are discursive constructions, so the<br />

question <strong>of</strong> ideology is part <strong>of</strong> the question <strong>of</strong> how discourse relates to other<br />

moments <strong>of</strong> social practices… (Chouliaraki & Fairclough, 1999, p. 26)<br />

Hidden curriculum, a term coined by Jackson was originally defined as:<br />

…the crowds, the praise, and the power that combine to give a distinctive flavor to<br />

classroom life collectively form a hidden curriculum where each student (and<br />

teacher) must master if he [sic] is to make his way satisfactorily through the school.<br />

The demands created by these features <strong>of</strong> classroom life may be contrasted with the<br />

academic demands—the “<strong>of</strong>ficial” curriculum, so to speak—to which educators<br />

traditionally have paid the most attention. As might be expected, the two curriculums<br />

are related to each other… (Jackson, 1968, pp. 33-34)<br />

Since this initial definition, its use and understanding has expanded significantly (see, for<br />

example, Hansen, Driscoll, & Arcilla, 2007; Giroux, 2006; Apple, 2000; McCarthy, 1990,<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!