11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.6 Category 3: Tasmanian Indigenous Australians<br />

6.6.1 Discourses <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Australians as a ‘problem’ to be dealt with<br />

through government policy.<br />

In discussing the conflict between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, samples <strong>of</strong><br />

terms used to describe Indigenous Australians include “aborigines” (Dunlop & Pike, 1963, p.<br />

74, 75), “blacks” (Dunlop & Pike p. 74, 75), “primitive Tasmanian race” (Dunlop & Pike p.<br />

75) and couched within a discourse <strong>of</strong> being a “social problem” (Dunlop & Pike p. 74). Traits<br />

explicitly attributed to Indigenous Australians are first as a “peaceable, friendly people”<br />

(Dunlop & Pike p. 74) and after provocation and the internment <strong>of</strong> all Tasmania Indigenous<br />

Australians, referred to as “primitive” (Dunlop & Pike p. 75). Similarly, language used in<br />

Landmarks: A history <strong>of</strong> Australia to the present day (Blackmore et al., 1969) to describe the<br />

genocide <strong>of</strong> Tasmania’s Indigenous population attributes blame <strong>of</strong> the social issues that<br />

emerged to “ex-convicts and the Bass Strait sealers” (Blackmore et al., 1969, p. 51). This<br />

perspective holds specific groups in the community to blame for the “problem” (Blackmore<br />

et al., 1969, p. 51) that arose when relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous<br />

Australians had negative repercussions. The government is left out <strong>of</strong> any discourse that<br />

suggests it had a role to play in the situation, instead placed in the position <strong>of</strong> ending conflict,<br />

with the narrative stating <strong>of</strong> the government activity <strong>of</strong> removing the Indigenous population<br />

from their traditional lands as “eventually the problem was ‘solved’ when in 1888 the last<br />

Tasmanian Aborigine died” (Blackmore et al., 1969, p. 51). Although the word solved is<br />

placed in quote marks indicating the authors do not share the opinion that this was an<br />

appropriate address <strong>of</strong> the issue, with no mediating <strong>of</strong> other possibilities or the wider<br />

ramifications <strong>of</strong> this policy, students are provided with an incomplete pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the<br />

government policies towards Tasmanian Aboriginals in the 1800s. There is no problematising<br />

<strong>of</strong> the removal <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Australians, with language such as “dying race” (Blackmore et<br />

al., 1969, p. 51) used, nor is this term placed in an historical context.<br />

The government policy <strong>of</strong> the time to stop violence between the Indigenous Australians and<br />

the colonisers is described in this narrative as two forms <strong>of</strong> actions. The first, a “Black Drive”<br />

(Dunlop & Pike, 1963, p. 74) whose purpose was to “...sweep all the surviving aborigines<br />

into the Tasman Peninsula, ended in the capture <strong>of</strong> one old man and a boy, for an outlay <strong>of</strong><br />

£30,000” (Dunlop & Pike, 1963, p. 74) did not meet with success. Therefore, a second and<br />

240

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!