PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
(b) Australian Aborigines. (Department of Education, 1964, p. 9) Although arguably individual teachers could decide to focus on a specific Indigenous Australian, group or cultural event, this is not the way it is presented in the Syllabus. For this generation of Queensland pupils, Indigenous Australians were, it would seem, far removed from mainstream society, and instead positioned as part of the natural world. The second time the syllabus discusses Indigenous Australians is for Grade 4, Term 2 where teachers are required to teach about ‘…the life of the original inhabitants of Tasmania’s Aborigines [sic]’ (Department of Education, 1964, p. 10). Whilst this is not an example of viewing Indigenous Australians as part of the natural environment, it does place Indigenous Australians firmly within The Past, an ambiguous prior era with no reference to any specific time frame except not in contemporary times. No mention of Indigenous Australians within contemporary times is made. Nor is any specific historical or cultural event included as a mandated or even suggested area for study, unlike other aspects of the curriculum. A stark contrast can be drawn with legitimised representations of early explorers whose names, personalities and personal histories are all presented by way of basing accounts of their exploits in discovering and opening up a land purportedly unknown to and by the original inhabitants (this, of course, is a standard or at least, common, colonialist revisioning of history that finds its ways into mandated curricula and supporting materials across the colonised world). From this, it can be inferred that an overarching view of Indigenous Australians was located in a period prior to European contact. Additionally, such a monocultural representation of Indigenous Australians does not consider differences between Indigenous groups and cultures in different parts of the continent and effectively constructs an undifferentiated ‘Other’. The third and final inclusion of Indigenous Australians in this syllabus, and the first mention of specific action by Indigenous Australians is within a unit that looks at explorers and significant agricultural developments, such as the introduction of wheat and Merino sheep to the Australian continent. The specific mention of Indigenous Australians is in relation to assistance given to explorers, under the heading and accompanying comment: “‘Saved by Friendly Aborigines’—with Sturt down the Murray” (Department of Education, 1964, p. 11). Again, Indigenous Australians are represented as unnamed and undifferentiated groups with 196
no specific mention of individuals; thus reinforcing the passivity attributed to this group in the retelling or reporting of historical events. Demonstrating the exclusion of Indigenous Australians from national history, in the Grade 6, Term 1, 2 and 3 unit of work titled ‘Australia’ (Department of Education, 1964, pp. 20-22) Indigenous Australians are not included at all. It can be seen, therefore, that throughout this era, Indigenous Australians are significantly underrepresented and are not included as forming either a significant part of the Australian history curriculum content or having a role or even a presence in contemporary Australian society. Exceptions to this are noted and analysed further in this chapter. 6.2.3 Key textbooks and related school curriculum documents. Textbooks selected for analysis are predominately placed in two categories. The first are the government published and sanctioned textbooks, Social Studies for Queensland schools series covering school grades 4 to 8; and Queensland School Readers covering school grades from Preparatory (pre-grade 1) to grade 8. Used throughout this era with their publication ceasing in the early 1970s they were still in use in some schools until as late as the 1980s. In addition, a periodical published and supplied to school students at a small cost by the Department of Education, the School Paper represented the official knowledge of the Department of Education at updated intervals. Therefore, both the Queensland Readers and editions of the School Paper form a part of the analysis of curriculum materials for this era. The second category is textbooks written by Queensland-based authors such as school inspectors and school teachers. This second type of textbook, although not officially published or endorsed by the Department of Education, was nevertheless in such widespread use throughout high schools in Queensland that they form an important part of the canon of textbooks used in this era. Regarding the place and importance of textbooks in general, the syllabus states, The text-books already supplied by the Department can be used by both teachers and children as reference books. They, or any other texts, are not, however, adequate as the only sources of information. They should, at all times, be used purposefully and not viewed as the sole means of instruction. No text-books can be regarded as setting up either maximum or minimum requirements. (Department of Education, 1964, p. 1) 197
- Page 160 and 161: Given the clear recollections of sc
- Page 162 and 163: 5.2 Education Context This section
- Page 164 and 165: following passage taken from the pr
- Page 166 and 167: 5.2.3 Key textbooks and related sch
- Page 168 and 169: Mariners of England a poem written
- Page 170 and 171: Source 5.3. Chapter II: The Britons
- Page 172 and 173: the largest for British heritages,
- Page 174 and 175: stands for the country itself and t
- Page 176 and 177: Source 5.4. The Flag of the Empire
- Page 178 and 179: Australasia appears in a number of
- Page 180 and 181: demands. But if they spoke with a u
- Page 182 and 183: 5.8.1 Discourses of legitimizing th
- Page 184 and 185: practical example: Australia’s pa
- Page 186 and 187: Although often mediated through the
- Page 188 and 189: which were, at the time, very emoti
- Page 190 and 191: Source 5.6. Front cover of Anzac Da
- Page 192 and 193: 5.9 Intersections of British Herita
- Page 194 and 195: Australia contains further signific
- Page 196 and 197: Source 5.7. Extract from Preface to
- Page 198 and 199: Furthermore, the use of primary sou
- Page 200 and 201: “…playing fast and loose with t
- Page 202 and 203: Australia experienced a growing str
- Page 204 and 205: Separate State responsibility has l
- Page 206 and 207: The two examples above, although br
- Page 208 and 209: It was in the 1952 syllabus that th
- Page 212 and 213: However, due to the wide distributi
- Page 214 and 215: matter in a fresh and interesting w
- Page 216 and 217: textbooks published in the early to
- Page 218 and 219: Source 6.3. A sample project sheet
- Page 220 and 221: narratives of so-named British expl
- Page 222 and 223: This image, like many of the narrat
- Page 224 and 225: killed by Indigenous Australians; E
- Page 226 and 227: possibly unintended message that th
- Page 228 and 229: Source 6.10. “Natives” extract
- Page 230 and 231: Source 6.11. “King was saved” e
- Page 232 and 233: Indigenous Australians is linked wi
- Page 234 and 235: one Indigenous person. There is a v
- Page 236 and 237: Source 6.15. Batman Treaty and Gove
- Page 238 and 239: Indigenous Australian interactions
- Page 240 and 241: Source 6.18. “Jacky’s Sad Story
- Page 242 and 243: Australians in history narratives.
- Page 244 and 245: comments that bring together the va
- Page 246 and 247: 6.5 Category 2: Frontier Conflicts
- Page 248 and 249: 6.5.2 Discourses of eye-witness acc
- Page 250 and 251: places where the natives were treat
- Page 252 and 253: Source 6.24. Frontier Conflicts ext
- Page 254 and 255: 6.6 Category 3: Tasmanian Indigenou
- Page 256 and 257: emoval of the captured aboriginals
- Page 258 and 259: Some emotion is attributed to this
(b) Australian Aborigines. (Department <strong>of</strong> Education, 1964, p. 9)<br />
Although arguably individual teachers could decide to focus on a specific Indigenous<br />
Australian, group or cultural event, this is not the way it is presented in the Syllabus. For this<br />
generation <strong>of</strong> Queensland pupils, Indigenous Australians were, it would seem, far removed<br />
from mainstream society, and instead positioned as part <strong>of</strong> the natural world.<br />
The second time the syllabus discusses Indigenous Australians is for Grade 4, Term 2 where<br />
teachers are required to teach about ‘…the life <strong>of</strong> the original inhabitants <strong>of</strong> Tasmania’s<br />
Aborigines [sic]’ (Department <strong>of</strong> Education, 1964, p. 10). Whilst this is not an example <strong>of</strong><br />
viewing Indigenous Australians as part <strong>of</strong> the natural environment, it does place Indigenous<br />
Australians firmly within The Past, an ambiguous prior era with no reference to any specific<br />
time frame except not in contemporary times. No mention <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Australians within<br />
contemporary times is made. Nor is any specific historical or cultural event included as a<br />
mandated or even suggested area for study, unlike other aspects <strong>of</strong> the curriculum. A stark<br />
contrast can be drawn with legitimised representations <strong>of</strong> early explorers whose names,<br />
personalities and personal histories are all presented by way <strong>of</strong> basing accounts <strong>of</strong> their<br />
exploits in discovering and opening up a land purportedly unknown to and by the original<br />
inhabitants (this, <strong>of</strong> course, is a standard or at least, common, colonialist revisioning <strong>of</strong><br />
history that finds its ways into mandated curricula and supporting materials across the<br />
colonised world).<br />
From this, it can be inferred that an overarching view <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Australians was located<br />
in a period prior to European contact. Additionally, such a monocultural representation <strong>of</strong><br />
Indigenous Australians does not consider differences between Indigenous groups and cultures<br />
in different parts <strong>of</strong> the continent and effectively constructs an undifferentiated ‘Other’.<br />
The third and final inclusion <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Australians in this syllabus, and the first mention<br />
<strong>of</strong> specific action by Indigenous Australians is within a unit that looks at explorers and<br />
significant agricultural developments, such as the introduction <strong>of</strong> wheat and Merino sheep to<br />
the Australian continent. The specific mention <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Australians is in relation to<br />
assistance given to explorers, under the heading and accompanying comment: “‘Saved by<br />
Friendly Aborigines’—with Sturt down the Murray” (Department <strong>of</strong> Education, 1964, p. 11).<br />
Again, Indigenous Australians are represented as unnamed and undifferentiated groups with<br />
196