PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

after World War I (WWI); the Australian Black Movement 1964-1975; and the 1988 Bicentennial 3 era. Influenced by Apple’s (1993, 2000) concept of official knowledge, a selection of schoolbased texts was analysed using primarily a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) approach. School-based texts include the relevant syllabus, Education Department approved textbooks, other approved school texts such as Queensland Readers, school textbooks published in Queensland, textbooks used in schools, and school literary texts. From each era, a minimum of ten (10) school texts, from primary and high school grades, were selected for data analysis. This number of texts has enabled a representative sample of information to be gathered from a variety of sources. In addition, where available, a resistant text published at the time has also been examined in order to demonstrate against the grain texts published in the same era. The narratives of such resistant examples provide opportunities for the illumination of the ways in which the dominant discourse of an era effectively marginalise (and at times, demonise) alternative readings of history or nationhood; even though such marginalised texts might in later eras assume legitimate status. The selection of all texts used in this project is guided by a set of criteria, explained in Chapter 3: Methodology, Research Design and Conduct. 1.3 Motivation to Conduct the Research The motivation to conduct this research came from being a History, SOSE and English teacher 4 during the time that the Queensland SOSE debates were featuring in public discourses, and the broader history/culture wars were featuring on national and international levels. The impact these debates had on classroom teaching, in terms of students, parents and other people I met on a social basis, questioning and criticizing the content taught, was quite significant and at times confronting. Keeping informed of the debates surrounding this issue then led to an interest in finding out which perspectives of Australian history had been privileged in Queensland school curriculum of previous eras, what the unstated ideological underpinnings of school syllabuses and textbooks were, and the connections to their own historical contexts. In a way, there was a motivation to engage in research that would enable a “…searching for new and interconnected ways of understanding power and oppression and 3 The year 1988 is an important one in Australia’s national history, being the 200 year anniversary of the arrival of the First Fleet from England to Port Jackson, Sydney. Chapter 9: 1988 Bicentennial era details the significance of Great Britain’s act of colonisation to Australian national history. 4 A thorough disclosure of researcher is included in Chapter 3: Methodology, Research Design and Conduct. 6

the ways they shape everyday life and human experience” (Kincheloe & McLaren, 2005, p. 306). Although heightened in recent years through the history/culture wars, the explicit politicization of history is not new (Curthoys & Docker, 2006). The context within which it is taught in schools can be viewed as a reflection of discourses of core or dominant sociopolitical values operating in society at the time. As such, this research draws on media articles and similar expressions of dominant public discourses 5 in order to portray the content of the History curriculum in Queensland schools during selected time periods of the 20 th century. This research then attempts to provide an interpretation, analysis and commentary of the dominant ideologies that have influenced the teaching of Australian history in Queensland schools, particularly in view of the continuing Federal government policy encroachment on State government education through, for example, the proposed national History curriculum. 1.4 Purpose and Relevance of the Research The two exemplar topics, representations of Indigenous Australian and British heritages were selected as topics of focus for a number of reasons. First, in terms of colonial discourses, these two groups have often been set up in opposition to each other. Binaries have been created for example, through government legislation, policies and public discourses. Larbalestier highlights the binary relationships that have been constructed between British colonialism and Indigenous people, writing “Indigenous Australians were abjectly interpellated [sic] in Western discourses and interpretations of British colonialism were entirely one-sided” (2004, para 15). Second, both groups have been at the centre of periods of rapid social change, three of which are highlighted in this research. At times the groups have intersected, for example during the 1988 Australian Bicentennial, making comparison of the exemplar topics during the same time period possible, enriching the analysis of their respective representations. Third, after a preliminary survey of Queensland textbooks from 1900-2000 these were two topics which were consistently included in school books, with their occasional omission noteworthy for this exclusion, particularly that of Indigenous Australians in earlier periods and British heritages in later periods. Fourth, and more as a side note, the two exemplar topics acting as binaries is reinforced by the early 20 th century novel, 5 For the purposes of this study, dominant values and discourses are those which are usually accepted and, more importantly perhaps, practiced by the majority of members of a community as “normal”, “just” or “right”. Gramsci’s (1988) notion of hegemony is central here, and is expanded on in Chapter 3: Methodology, Research Design and Conduct. 7

the ways they shape everyday life and human experience” (Kincheloe & McLaren, 2005, p.<br />

306).<br />

Although heightened in recent years through the history/culture wars, the explicit<br />

politicization <strong>of</strong> history is not new (Curthoys & Docker, 2006). The context within which it is<br />

taught in schools can be viewed as a reflection <strong>of</strong> discourses <strong>of</strong> core or dominant sociopolitical<br />

values operating in society at the time. As such, this research draws on media<br />

articles and similar expressions <strong>of</strong> dominant public discourses 5 in order to portray the content<br />

<strong>of</strong> the History curriculum in Queensland schools during selected time periods <strong>of</strong> the 20 th<br />

century. This research then attempts to provide an interpretation, analysis and commentary <strong>of</strong><br />

the dominant ideologies that have influenced the teaching <strong>of</strong> Australian history in Queensland<br />

schools, particularly in view <strong>of</strong> the continuing Federal government policy encroachment on<br />

State government education through, for example, the proposed national History curriculum.<br />

1.4 Purpose and Relevance <strong>of</strong> the Research<br />

The two exemplar topics, representations <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Australian and British heritages were<br />

selected as topics <strong>of</strong> focus for a number <strong>of</strong> reasons. First, in terms <strong>of</strong> colonial discourses,<br />

these two groups have <strong>of</strong>ten been set up in opposition to each other. Binaries have been<br />

created for example, through government legislation, policies and public discourses.<br />

Larbalestier highlights the binary relationships that have been constructed between British<br />

colonialism and Indigenous people, writing “Indigenous Australians were abjectly<br />

interpellated [sic] in Western discourses and interpretations <strong>of</strong> British colonialism were<br />

entirely one-sided” (2004, para 15). Second, both groups have been at the centre <strong>of</strong> periods <strong>of</strong><br />

rapid social change, three <strong>of</strong> which are highlighted in this research. At times the groups have<br />

intersected, for example during the 1988 Australian Bicentennial, making comparison <strong>of</strong> the<br />

exemplar topics during the same time period possible, enriching the analysis <strong>of</strong> their<br />

respective representations. Third, after a preliminary survey <strong>of</strong> Queensland textbooks from<br />

1900-2000 these were two topics which were consistently included in school books, with<br />

their occasional omission noteworthy for this exclusion, particularly that <strong>of</strong> Indigenous<br />

Australians in earlier periods and British heritages in later periods. Fourth, and more as a side<br />

note, the two exemplar topics acting as binaries is reinforced by the early 20 th century novel,<br />

5 For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this study, dominant values and discourses are those which are usually accepted and, more<br />

importantly perhaps, practiced by the majority <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> a community as “normal”, “just” or “right”.<br />

Gramsci’s (1988) notion <strong>of</strong> hegemony is central here, and is expanded on in Chapter 3: Methodology, Research<br />

Design and Conduct.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!