PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

It was in the 1952 syllabus that the Social Studies subject was created with the inclusion of History beginning in grade three with the topic Stories from History. Emphasising the importance of narrative in teaching students, and the interest in linking cross-curricula content, the teaching of history is described in the syllabus notes as: These stories are intended to serve as an introduction to the study of history in the later grades. The characters should be selected from the history of the world in order to give the pupil a broad view, and, as far as possible, to correlate with the work in geography in this grade. The list of characters is merely suggestive. Other characters might be substituted at the discretion of the teacher. Biographical details need not be laboured. The teacher will make his own selection. The following are suggested:-William Tell, Bruce, Joan of Arc, Florence Nightingale, Grace Darling, Livingstone, Captain Scott, Hinkler, Kingsford Smith, Confucius, Hiawatha, Pocahontas, Horatius, Corporal French V.C., Sir Philip Sidney, Gregory and the Slave Children, Caxton and the Printing Press. (Department of Public Instruction, 1952, p. 6) Explaining the reason for moving towards multi-disciplinary Social Studies, rather than take a discipline-specific subject approach, the syllabus states: The appearance of “ Social Studies ” in curricula is indicative of two interdependent tendencies in the educational practices of our time. One of them is the tendency to relate matter to be taught to the actual experiences of children and to prepare the child for the life of the man through participation in activities of the type he is likely to meet during his life-time ; the other is the tendency to depart from rigid, convenient but artificial “ subject ” approach in formal education. Conceptions of what constitute “ Social Studies ” vary according to how much of the total curriculum is unified. This course of Social Studies has been planned to bring about a systematic correlation in Civics, Geography, and History. 194

... The major objective of Social Studies is preparation of the child for life as an effective citizen of the community...Children should be led to see in what ways our democratic practices are desirable and trained to act with that intelligent understanding so vital to democratic living. The syllabus as set forth a suggested scheme of work. It must be studied entirely before detailed plans are prepared for particular grades. Emphasis throughout will be upon the study of people in their environment. The importance of beginning with the known—the child and where he lives—and of presenting information in such a way that the child will understand it and be interested in it is stressed. To this latter end the use of stories, the encouragement of self-activity, the more frequent employment of the project or activity method, and the correlation of Social Studies with other subjects of the curriculum are strongly recommended. (Department of Public Instruction, 1952, p. 6) This syllabus along with the 1964 Social Studies Syllabus firmly locates representations of Indigenous people, their culture (rather than cultures, as it was a very monocultural view presented) and events within geography, rather than history. Within a geography disciplinary framework, Indigenous representations were formed around notions of being connected to the natural world—flora and fauna—rather than the social or cultural worlds. Accordingly and repeating the 1952 syllabus, significant gaps and outright omissions in the presentation of Indigenous histories and cultures are now, almost five decades hence, glaringly apparent. In the whole of both syllabuses, for example, no specific Indigenous Australian is mentioned, despite many non-Indigenous Australians and Europeans being specifically named and singled out for study in school. Additionally, a (then) contemporary understanding of Indigenous Australians is missing, resulting in an a-historical representation, frozen-in-time exotica image presented to students. For example, in the 1964 syllabus for Grade 4 Term 1, the first mention of Indigenous Australians occurs within the section titled, ‘Recommended Centre of Interest and Division of Work’, where teachers are advised to cover the following two topics: 2. (a) Australia’s Living Wonders. Birds, Trees, Animals. 195

...<br />

The major objective <strong>of</strong> Social Studies is preparation <strong>of</strong> the child for life as an<br />

effective citizen <strong>of</strong> the community...Children should be led to see in what ways our<br />

democratic practices are desirable and trained to act with that intelligent<br />

understanding so vital to democratic living.<br />

The syllabus as set forth a suggested scheme <strong>of</strong> work. It must be studied<br />

entirely before detailed plans are prepared for particular grades. Emphasis throughout<br />

will be upon the study <strong>of</strong> people in their environment. The importance <strong>of</strong> beginning<br />

with the known—the child and where he lives—and <strong>of</strong> presenting information in<br />

such a way that the child will understand it and be interested in it is stressed. To this<br />

latter end the use <strong>of</strong> stories, the encouragement <strong>of</strong> self-activity, the more frequent<br />

employment <strong>of</strong> the project or activity method, and the correlation <strong>of</strong> Social Studies<br />

with other subjects <strong>of</strong> the curriculum are strongly recommended. (Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Public Instruction, 1952, p. 6)<br />

This syllabus along with the 1964 Social Studies Syllabus firmly locates representations <strong>of</strong><br />

Indigenous people, their culture (rather than cultures, as it was a very monocultural view<br />

presented) and events within geography, rather than history. Within a geography disciplinary<br />

framework, Indigenous representations were formed around notions <strong>of</strong> being connected to the<br />

natural world—flora and fauna—rather than the social or cultural worlds. Accordingly and<br />

repeating the 1952 syllabus, significant gaps and outright omissions in the presentation <strong>of</strong><br />

Indigenous histories and cultures are now, almost five decades hence, glaringly apparent. In<br />

the whole <strong>of</strong> both syllabuses, for example, no specific Indigenous Australian is mentioned,<br />

despite many non-Indigenous Australians and Europeans being specifically named and<br />

singled out for study in school. Additionally, a (then) contemporary understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

Indigenous Australians is missing, resulting in an a-historical representation, frozen-in-time<br />

exotica image presented to students. For example, in the 1964 syllabus for Grade 4 Term 1,<br />

the first mention <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Australians occurs within the section titled, ‘Recommended<br />

Centre <strong>of</strong> Interest and Division <strong>of</strong> Work’, where teachers are advised to cover the following<br />

two topics:<br />

2. (a) Australia’s Living Wonders.<br />

Birds, Trees, Animals.<br />

195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!