PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

Furthermore, the use of primary source documents in the textbooks is significantly flawed. Their inclusion is limited, and when included as part of the narrative, they are included in a way that is antithesis to the history discipline. They are rarely sourced and generally no mediation for the student is provided in order for them to locate the recounts themselves. Nor is there an attempt to provide alternative views through primary source documents, than what is being expressed in the narrative written by the textbook authors. This emphasizes the need to ensure that a school History curriculum is directly connected with the discipline of history, and not a course of the appreciation of literature or culture. It is apparent that students need to be provided with scaffolding in order to develop the skills of an historian, at an age appropriate level. Finally, except for minor diversions, the history content presented during this era was generally celebratory. This is arguably within an overall discourse of progression operating, with inefficiencies brought up in the narrative countered by an overarching understanding of celebration and progression. 5.10.3 Curriculum as gatekeeper of conservative content and values or agent for change. The hidden ideological constructions of the curriculum are distinctly conservative and encompassing of one perspective. An example of the conservatism of the curriculum reads: It has at times been suggested that Parkes had such radical views that he would have liked New South Wales to sever her connection with England and set up as an independent country. This is not true, for he always believed in the maintenance of the British Empire. But he did hope that the day would dawn when Australia would speak with equal voice with England and other British States in a Commonwealth of British Nations. He once said, “I believe the time is fast approaching when we shall cease to speak of England and her colonies. The time is fast coming when these giant children of the mother of nations will assert power and importance for themselves: but as they grow in strength.......they will grow in reverential love for the Sovereign and for England. We shall have to throw into disuse the word ‘colonies,’ for a grand world-encircling British Empire will arise resting upon a hundred isles......And this new Empire, embracing the outlying countries and the Old Land must be united on terms of a just and an enlightened equality.” Scarcely had the hoary and revered political warrior passed away when the Empire began to take shape in the form which he had predicted. (Cramp, 1927, p. 237-238) 184

Implicit in this passage, and representative of the ideology underpinning curriculum during this time, is that holding or declaring “radical views” (Cramp, 1927, p. 237) is not a positive trait. This is emphasised in the extract above through a sentence stating that Parkes was considered radical by some, but assuring the reader, “this is not true...” (Cramp, 1927, p. 237). Ideology of knowledge that is apparent in this textbook is that there can be no opinion other than that expressed. Although two opposing views are presented here, there is no opportunity for students to make up their own minds by being given samples of primary source documents. Instead the truth is mediated for students by the textbook author. 5.10.4 On being British. A noteworthy area of content that changed in textbooks published prior to WWI and those after WWI is the British battles mentioned so prolifically in textbooks (F.J. Gould, 1909) and Readers (1913a, 1913b) before WWI have largely been omitted and not completely replaced by WWI stories. This resulted in a decreased focus on military discourses post WWI. The battles that are mentioned are now largely to do with WWI, especially Gallipoli and to a lesser extent France, and some pre-WWI conflicts are still included. However, overall there is less interest in military conflict as being promoted as worthy, perhaps a consequence of the impact of the large-scale slaughter of enlisted soldiers, not previously seen in any conflict. This era has brought some unexpected findings with it not being as ‘British’ as expected. Whilst the British heritages discourses are certainly present and Australian identity can be seen to be mediated through British heritages, this does not overshadow all content. Whereas memory making, constructed through selected documents used in history textbooks and school history textbooks in contemporary times, drawing on specific material from this era, emphasize Australia’s connection to Great Britain, this was not as significantly reflected in school History textbooks of the time. Although it is clearly evident that Great Britain is presented as the superior power to the colonial outpost, Australia as an independent country formed an important and significant aspect of the curriculum content. Whilst there is evidence of loyalty to Great Britain, and it is clear that Australians should see themselves as British this is not communicated with the amount of fervour that would be otherwise expected. This expectation is based on the type of mediated memory making about Australia’s connection with Great Britain in the earlier parts of the 20 th century. This is an example of data analysis not pre-empting findings, a common criticism of this type of qualitative research, discussed by Pennycook (1994); Wetherell (2001) and Verschueren as 185

Furthermore, the use <strong>of</strong> primary source documents in the textbooks is significantly flawed.<br />

Their inclusion is limited, and when included as part <strong>of</strong> the narrative, they are included in a<br />

way that is antithesis to the history discipline. They are rarely sourced and generally no<br />

mediation for the student is provided in order for them to locate the recounts themselves. Nor<br />

is there an attempt to provide alternative views through primary source documents, than what<br />

is being expressed in the narrative written by the textbook authors. This emphasizes the need<br />

to ensure that a school History curriculum is directly connected with the discipline <strong>of</strong> history,<br />

and not a course <strong>of</strong> the appreciation <strong>of</strong> literature or culture. It is apparent that students need to<br />

be provided with scaffolding in order to develop the skills <strong>of</strong> an historian, at an age<br />

appropriate level. Finally, except for minor diversions, the history content presented during<br />

this era was generally celebratory. This is arguably within an overall discourse <strong>of</strong> progression<br />

operating, with inefficiencies brought up in the narrative countered by an overarching<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> celebration and progression.<br />

5.10.3 Curriculum as gatekeeper <strong>of</strong> conservative content and values or agent for<br />

change.<br />

The hidden ideological constructions <strong>of</strong> the curriculum are distinctly conservative and<br />

encompassing <strong>of</strong> one perspective. An example <strong>of</strong> the conservatism <strong>of</strong> the curriculum reads:<br />

It has at times been suggested that Parkes had such radical views that he would have<br />

liked New South Wales to sever her connection with England and set up as an<br />

independent country. This is not true, for he always believed in the maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />

the British Empire. But he did hope that the day would dawn when Australia would<br />

speak with equal voice with England and other British States in a Commonwealth <strong>of</strong><br />

British Nations. He once said, “I believe the time is fast approaching when we shall<br />

cease to speak <strong>of</strong> England and her colonies. The time is fast coming when these giant<br />

children <strong>of</strong> the mother <strong>of</strong> nations will assert power and importance for themselves:<br />

but as they grow in strength.......they will grow in reverential love for the Sovereign<br />

and for England. We shall have to throw into disuse the word ‘colonies,’ for a grand<br />

world-encircling British Empire will arise resting upon a hundred isles......And this<br />

new Empire, embracing the outlying countries and the Old Land must be united on<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> a just and an enlightened equality.” Scarcely had the hoary and revered<br />

political warrior passed away when the Empire began to take shape in the form<br />

which he had predicted. (Cramp, 1927, p. 237-238)<br />

184

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!