PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...
5.9 Intersections of British Heritages and Indigenous Representations Although the analysis focus of this era is the British heritages exemplar topic, rather than Indigenous representations, the small amount of times when the two exemplar topics intersect are included here so that a connection is able to be made between eras. Binaries are present in the socio-political discourses of the time, through for example (and as briefly mentioned in Chapter 1: Introduction), fiction novels such as Settler and Savage: One hundred years ago in Australia (De Boos, 1906). Whether the exemplar topics are also represented this way in school curriculum forms the focus of analysis here. In the case of the example of the novel mentioned, settler is code for white European (usually from Great Britain) taking up residence in Australia; and savage is code for Indigenous Australian living in a perceived inferior tradition lifestyle environment. Of interest, this type of categorizing of groups has occurred in school curriculum across nation states, particularly when a dominant and a subjugated group are intentionally constructed. In discussing the way Columbus and white exploration is taught in United States schools, for example, hooks writes: We were taught that the Indians would have conquered and dominated white explorers if they could have but they were simply not strong or smart enough. Embedded in all these teachings was the assumption that it was the whiteness of these explorers in the ‘New World’ that gave them the greatest power. The word ‘whiteness’ was never used. The key word, the one that synonymous with whiteness, was ‘civilization.’ Hence, we were made to understand at a young age that whatever cruelties were done to the indigenous peoples of this country, the ‘Indians,’ was necessary to bring the great gift of civilization. Domination, it became clear in our young minds, was central to the project of civilization. And if civilization was good and necessary despite the costs, then that had to mean domination was equally good. (1994, p. 199) 5.9.1 Discourses of progress. Progress, when included in school curriculum, is seen as explicitly working towards betterment, which is code for goodness of nations and individuals within that nation, often coupled with patriotism. This is clearly a conservative, Whig version of history presented to school students, representing national history as a continual line of upward progression. The textbooks portray Great Britain as the only nation that identifies its mistakes and moves 178
towards not repeating these through a process of self-correction. Here, a type of dichotomy is established between Great Britain and all other nations, where Britain is the only nation cognizant of morality. An extract where this is illustrated particularly overtly comes from The children's book of moral lessons: Third series, in a section titled Lesson XXIII Looking Backwards under the subsection, Bad deeds of the past: Of course, many of the ideas and customs of the Past were bad, and it is good that we should drop them. The old English took great pleasure in robbery; they sailed the sea in their wooden ships, and landed on coasts where they thought they could obtain booty in gold, corn, prisoners, etc. After Oliver Cromwell’s death, his body was not allowed to rest in peace; his enemies dug it up, and suspended it by chains to a gibbet such as criminals were hanged on; but no one would wish to do such a coarse deed to-day. An Englishman, Sir John Hawkins, was the first to engage in the negro slave trade, and his coat-of-arms bore the picture of a black man tied with a cord; but you may be sure no man to-day would care to have such a coat-of-arms painted over his doorway or on his window. Such thoughts and habits as these we are glad to cast aside. (F.J. Gould, 1909, p. 115) This textbook overlooks details of the past injustices it mentions, as well as others that could be potentially included, in a way that provides neither an historical context nor an explanation of factors that informed change. The textbook explains this in a way that although, “customs of the Past were bad, and it is good that we should drop them” (F.J. Gould, 1909, p. 115), negative activities conducted in Great Britain no longer exist. This is communicated overtly through the wording: “but no one would wish to do such a coarse deed to-day...; but you may be sure no man to-day would...; [and] Such thoughts and habits as these we are glad to cast aside” (F.J. Gould, 1909, p. 115). Furthermore, the use of “we” implies that all school students reading the book are from the same mono-British heritage, ignoring a variety of cultures that the children come from (even from within British heritages), and also ignoring class issues, including the fact that many of the students would have a personal family history (such as forced transportation from England to Australia) of injustices endured as a consequence of the British ruling classes imposing unjust laws and practices. The following passage taken from Lesson XXIII Looking Backwards in The children's book of moral lessons is indicative of the types of British-centric ideologies presented throughout this textbook. A passage covering the visit of David Carnegies (British adventurer) to Western 179
- Page 142 and 143: selection, resulting in as comprehe
- Page 144 and 145: • “1. Focus upon a social probl
- Page 146 and 147: contextualised in the wider study,
- Page 148 and 149: Dijk as “knowledge, attitudes and
- Page 150 and 151: 136
- Page 152 and 153: a type of ‘neutral’ fact-sheet
- Page 154 and 155: across the three distinct eras focu
- Page 156 and 157: stories by authors such as Arthur C
- Page 158 and 159: opposes the notion that a person is
- Page 160 and 161: Given the clear recollections of sc
- Page 162 and 163: 5.2 Education Context This section
- Page 164 and 165: following passage taken from the pr
- Page 166 and 167: 5.2.3 Key textbooks and related sch
- Page 168 and 169: Mariners of England a poem written
- Page 170 and 171: Source 5.3. Chapter II: The Britons
- Page 172 and 173: the largest for British heritages,
- Page 174 and 175: stands for the country itself and t
- Page 176 and 177: Source 5.4. The Flag of the Empire
- Page 178 and 179: Australasia appears in a number of
- Page 180 and 181: demands. But if they spoke with a u
- Page 182 and 183: 5.8.1 Discourses of legitimizing th
- Page 184 and 185: practical example: Australia’s pa
- Page 186 and 187: Although often mediated through the
- Page 188 and 189: which were, at the time, very emoti
- Page 190 and 191: Source 5.6. Front cover of Anzac Da
- Page 194 and 195: Australia contains further signific
- Page 196 and 197: Source 5.7. Extract from Preface to
- Page 198 and 199: Furthermore, the use of primary sou
- Page 200 and 201: “…playing fast and loose with t
- Page 202 and 203: Australia experienced a growing str
- Page 204 and 205: Separate State responsibility has l
- Page 206 and 207: The two examples above, although br
- Page 208 and 209: It was in the 1952 syllabus that th
- Page 210 and 211: (b) Australian Aborigines. (Departm
- Page 212 and 213: However, due to the wide distributi
- Page 214 and 215: matter in a fresh and interesting w
- Page 216 and 217: textbooks published in the early to
- Page 218 and 219: Source 6.3. A sample project sheet
- Page 220 and 221: narratives of so-named British expl
- Page 222 and 223: This image, like many of the narrat
- Page 224 and 225: killed by Indigenous Australians; E
- Page 226 and 227: possibly unintended message that th
- Page 228 and 229: Source 6.10. “Natives” extract
- Page 230 and 231: Source 6.11. “King was saved” e
- Page 232 and 233: Indigenous Australians is linked wi
- Page 234 and 235: one Indigenous person. There is a v
- Page 236 and 237: Source 6.15. Batman Treaty and Gove
- Page 238 and 239: Indigenous Australian interactions
- Page 240 and 241: Source 6.18. “Jacky’s Sad Story
towards not repeating these through a process <strong>of</strong> self-correction. Here, a type <strong>of</strong> dichotomy is<br />
established between Great Britain and all other nations, where Britain is the only nation<br />
cognizant <strong>of</strong> morality. An extract where this is illustrated particularly overtly comes from The<br />
children's book <strong>of</strong> moral lessons: Third series, in a section titled Lesson XXIII Looking<br />
Backwards under the subsection, Bad deeds <strong>of</strong> the past:<br />
Of course, many <strong>of</strong> the ideas and customs <strong>of</strong> the Past were bad, and it is good that we<br />
should drop them. The old English took great pleasure in robbery; they sailed the sea<br />
in their wooden ships, and landed on coasts where they thought they could obtain<br />
booty in gold, corn, prisoners, etc. After Oliver Cromwell’s death, his body was not<br />
allowed to rest in peace; his enemies dug it up, and suspended it by chains to a gibbet<br />
such as criminals were hanged on; but no one would wish to do such a coarse deed<br />
to-day. An Englishman, Sir John Hawkins, was the first to engage in the negro slave<br />
trade, and his coat-<strong>of</strong>-arms bore the picture <strong>of</strong> a black man tied with a cord; but you<br />
may be sure no man to-day would care to have such a coat-<strong>of</strong>-arms painted over his<br />
doorway or on his window. Such thoughts and habits as these we are glad to cast<br />
aside. (F.J. Gould, 1909, p. 115)<br />
This textbook overlooks details <strong>of</strong> the past injustices it mentions, as well as others that could<br />
be potentially included, in a way that provides neither an historical context nor an explanation<br />
<strong>of</strong> factors that informed change. The textbook explains this in a way that although, “customs<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Past were bad, and it is good that we should drop them” (F.J. Gould, 1909, p. 115),<br />
negative activities conducted in Great Britain no longer exist. This is communicated overtly<br />
through the wording: “but no one would wish to do such a coarse deed to-day...; but you may<br />
be sure no man to-day would...; [and] Such thoughts and habits as these we are glad to cast<br />
aside” (F.J. Gould, 1909, p. 115). Furthermore, the use <strong>of</strong> “we” implies that all school<br />
students reading the book are from the same mono-British heritage, ignoring a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
cultures that the children come from (even from within British heritages), and also ignoring<br />
class issues, including the fact that many <strong>of</strong> the students would have a personal family history<br />
(such as forced transportation from England to Australia) <strong>of</strong> injustices endured as a<br />
consequence <strong>of</strong> the British ruling classes imposing unjust laws and practices.<br />
The following passage taken from Lesson XXIII Looking Backwards in The children's book <strong>of</strong><br />
moral lessons is indicative <strong>of</strong> the types <strong>of</strong> British-centric ideologies presented throughout this<br />
textbook. A passage covering the visit <strong>of</strong> David Carnegies (British adventurer) to Western<br />
179