11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.9 Intersections <strong>of</strong> British Heritages and Indigenous Representations<br />

Although the analysis focus <strong>of</strong> this era is the British heritages exemplar topic, rather than<br />

Indigenous representations, the small amount <strong>of</strong> times when the two exemplar topics intersect<br />

are included here so that a connection is able to be made between eras. Binaries are present in<br />

the socio-political discourses <strong>of</strong> the time, through for example (and as briefly mentioned in<br />

Chapter 1: Introduction), fiction novels such as Settler and Savage: One hundred years ago<br />

in Australia (De Boos, 1906). Whether the exemplar topics are also represented this way in<br />

school curriculum forms the focus <strong>of</strong> analysis here. In the case <strong>of</strong> the example <strong>of</strong> the novel<br />

mentioned, settler is code for white European (usually from Great Britain) taking up<br />

residence in Australia; and savage is code for Indigenous Australian living in a perceived<br />

inferior tradition lifestyle environment.<br />

Of interest, this type <strong>of</strong> categorizing <strong>of</strong> groups has occurred in school curriculum across<br />

nation states, particularly when a dominant and a subjugated group are intentionally<br />

constructed. In discussing the way Columbus and white exploration is taught in United States<br />

schools, for example, hooks writes:<br />

We were taught that the Indians would have conquered and dominated white<br />

explorers if they could have but they were simply not strong or smart enough.<br />

Embedded in all these teachings was the assumption that it was the whiteness <strong>of</strong><br />

these explorers in the ‘New World’ that gave them the greatest power. The word<br />

‘whiteness’ was never used. The key word, the one that synonymous with whiteness,<br />

was ‘civilization.’ Hence, we were made to understand at a young age that whatever<br />

cruelties were done to the indigenous peoples <strong>of</strong> this country, the ‘Indians,’ was<br />

necessary to bring the great gift <strong>of</strong> civilization. Domination, it became clear in our<br />

young minds, was central to the project <strong>of</strong> civilization. And if civilization was good<br />

and necessary despite the costs, then that had to mean domination was equally good.<br />

(1994, p. 199)<br />

5.9.1 Discourses <strong>of</strong> progress.<br />

Progress, when included in school curriculum, is seen as explicitly working towards<br />

betterment, which is code for goodness <strong>of</strong> nations and individuals within that nation, <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

coupled with patriotism. This is clearly a conservative, Whig version <strong>of</strong> history presented to<br />

school students, representing national history as a continual line <strong>of</strong> upward progression. The<br />

textbooks portray Great Britain as the only nation that identifies its mistakes and moves<br />

178

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!